Why can't people not take an issue with it? And discuss it?
Or should that be made illegal to protect the fee-fees of the mentally ill?
Careful bruh, that cat woman thing is out there
Mocking serves as a form of applying social conformity. To an extent it is present even in the animal kingdom.That's very different to mocking and calling a freak.
There's no transgression in casual and honest discussion and/or negotiation.
There is transgression in mockery.
I believe even the bible calls mockery a sin?
Regardless, I feel like people don't understand where the line is.
Yeah you have to respect their commitment when they demand litter boxes...Careful bruh, that cat woman thing is out there
Some things need to be mocked. Like trannies and their enablers denying basic biology.That's very different to mocking and calling a freak.
There's no transgression in casual and honest discussion and/or negotiation.
There is transgression in mockery.
I believe even the bible calls mockery a sin?
Regardless, I feel like people don't understand where the line is.
Why can't people not take an issue with it? And discuss it?
Or should that be made illegal to protect the fee-fees of the mentally ill?
Mocking serves as a form of applying social conformity. To an extent it is present even in the animal kingdom.
Many of the current trend of idiocy we see stemming from the US etc. would be solved if those people were publically mocked instead.
Some things need to be mocked. Like trannies and their enablers denying basic biology.
Even medieval courts knew this with jesters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jester
I guess there's no going back from this.Why?
![]()
You're the only one catching feelings here, my guy.It can be discussed, nobody is barring discussion.
All the people upset over an individual doing his own thing can equally be discussed, despite how much it hurts their fee-fees.
Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people. Something like that anyway.
Odds of being correct when calling someone an idiot is 50/50Nope, that just begets further divide and feeds ego.
You don't get to call someone an idiot, without assuming some air of moral authority over them. That's literally how it works (Sounds arrogant doesn't it?). Why do that to someone who has not transgressed you? You're just opening yourself up to the same as logically it works both ways.
Rather save it for where it matters, when someone has actually done something bad to you or someone else.
You're the only one catching feelings here, my guy.
You were the first to have a sh*t-fit when someone decided to, in a clearly satirical fashion, take the micky out of the story.
Calm yourself. No need for all that pearl clutching as, ironically, it is the same thing you're accusing others of.
They'd be wrong. He doesn't have all the elements for it to be called "blackface".I'm curious what would happen if someone accused him of "blackface"?![]()
It was tongue in cheek, but that hasn't stopped many of such cases in the past being falsely labelled as such. For example, ironically also alien tangential, the faux outrage over thisThey'd be wrong. He doesn't have all the elements for it to be called "blackface".
Odds of being correct when calling someone an idiot is 50/50But no that's not what I mean.
Pretending that something is normal when it's not gives the appearance that it is. Take the whole birthing person nonsense for example. Only a very small fringe group of people believe this, yet due to the silence and unwillingness to call it out it appears as if its the norm. Leading to changes being implemented where none are warranted.
The whole body positive campaign backfiring is another example, but I do agree there is a fine line between ridiculing something to call it out and becoming abusive