WaxLyrical
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2011
- Messages
- 21,806
If gov say they allowed that speed, do you think they'll say - ha boza, is too fas.How many i-Siyayas can do 232km/h?
Or they'll upgrade?
If gov say they allowed that speed, do you think they'll say - ha boza, is too fas.How many i-Siyayas can do 232km/h?
Even when the road is arrow straight for as far as the eye can see with not a soul in site (until the cop jumps out the bushes tho)?Speeding on a public road is reckless.
The autobahn is indeed an excellent example.99% of accidents are not because of speed, but because of reckless driving. There's a difference.
Focusing on a arbitrary number is silly.
The autobahn is a perfect example of this.
Speed is irrelevant to taxi's. It is a question about economy vs. time.If gov say they allowed that speed, do you think they'll say - ha boza, is too fas.
Or they'll upgrade?
Even when the road is arrow straight for as far as the eye can see with not a soul in site (until the cop jumps out the bushes tho)?
Well this is a propaganda piece, but it does make my point. Germany is one of the safest countries.
You have to factor in risk. Taxis drive as fast as is reasonably possible.Speed is irrelevant to taxi's. It is a question about economy vs. time.
Non of them care about the speed limit in anycase. They drive the speed they want. So changes to the speed limit doesn't affect them. Or are you trying to argue taxis are law abiding?
Doesnt help to point out the obvious, especially here.
If you drive 55KM/h and kill someone, no one bats an eye.
Wanna do 80KM/h in the 3rd overtaking lane, go for it.
Those who actually get in accidents doing 60KM/h. No worries, its an "accident". No repercussions.
Taxi's driving in the yellow lane and all bad driving, nothing.
But point at these guys that made no accidents....oh hell no.
Just dont go over the magical number 120.
99% of accidents are not because of speed, but because of reckless driving. There's a difference.
Focusing on a arbitrary number is silly.
The autobahn is a perfect example of this.
BS.You have to factor in risk. Taxis drive as fast as is reasonably possible.
Increasing the limit will allow them to increase their speed exponentially, increasing the risk, leading to more deaths.
I'd totally support increasing the limit if it weren't for this one death trap.
Making my point for me. Thanks.
It's almost like it's common sense or something
Making my point for me. Thanks.
Papa needs a pasta
Yes, but what about the drivers. All drivers (the ones in the other lanes as well). To put this into perspective: How many prozacs would you need for a German traffic cop before letting him lose on our roads?Autobahn in Germany is one example. As for ability and training, it was necessary a decade or more ago as essential. New electronics and the vehicles onboard computer can pretty much keep the vehicle stable at those speeds by intelligently adjusting nowadays, all it takes is a fairly competent driver with a bit of road experience.
You getting close. How many i-Siyayas changing lanes without signalling or driving on the road skirts?How many i-Siyayas can do 232km/h?
You getting close. How many i-Siyayas changing lanes without signalling or driving on the road skirts?
It's a driver attitude on both sides. Add the speed differential as you yourself point out.
Are people actually arguing double standards? It’s okay to speed in a super car because it’s made for it?
Or it’s okay to speed in my well maintained car because the taxis are reckless and don’t care for anything?