Then just don't let those countries have access to this technology.
EDIT: Even if they get he technology through illicit means it's a bit rich telling a mother of a raped 5 year old " Yeah sorry but we could have stopped this crime but we were worried about the actions of Russian cop if he got his hands on the technology we would have used to catch the criminal."
FYI Russia produces a lot of child pron. The child pron they produce or produced was made by the actual parents themselves or with parental consent. Most child abuse is not perpetrated by strangers who kidnap children on the street and then take them to some underground video labs, its the parents and close relatives who do it either for money or because they are pedos (or both). The mother above should be the prime suspect in the case
and if not - wth was she to let her child be used for child pron?
We need to put things in context. Most child abuse is not done for child pron. Child pron is an emotive reason used to erode personal liberties the same way that TERRORISM is. In other words, if you password protect something on your PC you must be a child pronographer or a terrorist. YES I'm all for putting away child pronographers or molesters and terrorists but we should
not do so at the expense of our liberties. If they want to go after child pronographers track the sites down and find out who is hosting them (if not botnet based) and try to identify the victims from the images then find those
victims and bash a few skulls from then on.
If governments want to introduce such laws let them be honest about it at least. Say - we want to know what you low life hoi-poloi think about us, and we want to get rid those who disagree or question our policies.
Sign up with Google
