To RAG or should I say - of RAG I have this to say:
Ever since RAG has popped up in the aftermath of MTI, I have seriously suspected that the simply must have some agenda that they are pushing, but could not put my finger on exactly what it is.
After some thought as well as more intel and input from other people, I have this hypothesis to share:
Is RAG setting out to gain MTI Members' trust, pretending that they will fight the fight for them and positioning themselves to ultimately get proxy from the majority of MTI Creditors for when the MTI Creditors need to vote on matters concerning the Liquidation?
Now this may still sound innocent enough to some, however I do not think RAG's loyalties are necessarily with the Creditors. RAG has been seen as 'friendly' with some of the big MTI pushers right from day one, these same MTI pushers will ultimately not be Creditors once MTI has been declared a PONZI, but Debtors who have to cough up their ill gotten gains.
So, it is pretty clear to me that RAG has been cozying up to both sides: firstly the future Debtors (Winners) and then the future Creditors (Losers). Of possible less importance, RAG is trying their very best to gain some favour or influence with (or at least not antagonize) the advocates and Liquidators.
So, I just have to ask the following question: are they cozying up to the future Creditors to mislead and ultimately dupe them once again?