PrinceVlad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2012
- Messages
- 222
As far as I recall Krion was about R1.5 bn, so this is a lot bigger than that.Was this Ponzi the biggest one in SA so far?
As far as I recall Krion was about R1.5 bn, so this is a lot bigger than that.Was this Ponzi the biggest one in SA so far?
.... or Pick & Pay needs her more than the Messiah does......Also the fact that Nerina Steynberg hasn't put out a missing person report for Johann, shows she plays a bigger role in all of this than we think.
Added to which, the MTI Statement which diverted blame to Nerina used our information as the basis of the whole narrative. Unless, of course, JS was meant to be reading these and being warned to move on asap? From my little, and legal, time spent in Brazil unless I was conversant in Portuguese I would use it just as a staging post for somewhere else - Colombia or Panama most likely.We’ve known for a long time that they read what we post. The fact that Cheri so openly spoke about Johann being in Sao Paolo, just after we floated that theory here, is just waaaaaay to much of a coincidence. If Johann ever was in Brazil (and that’s a big if), I’m sure he was just passing through.
Edit - I doubt that Cheri would even be able to find Sao Paolo on a map.
Ooh shoot deetsMTI just made the news on tv
But what if there are no assets.....Obviously not, because the order is not final. But remember the process just to track all the assets takes longer than the time until the Rule Nisi. He probably could start assessing claims prior to the final order but then there's the possibility that it could end up being a waste of money.
If the sole purpose was to safeguard the assets there are far quicker and cheaper options.
Very clear. It is an excellent idea to put it out for those poor fools who are flopping like fish on a dry dam bed. It might help some of them to not be scammed by the equivalent of ambulance chasers for liquidations.Very nice explanation, may be an idea to post on the Telegram groups as their is a lot of confusion I see
Then nobody get's any money.But what if there are no assets.....
I've said before the various elements cooked up a business model using skills and experience from their various undertakings to build a mega-con,probably over tea at Cheri's weekend presentations for MDCWow, so it was scammer found other scammers, and there you have the perfect recipe for the largest ponzi scheme in south african history.

That is what really $i**s^s me off. The assets have almost all been taken by the inner circle. That is my biggest problem with the provisional liquidation. I cannot stomach the idea of lindbolletjies etc etc getting away with more btc. I had hoped that they would clamp down on everything. On the other hand, allowing MTI to operate as normal might be illuminating; I wonder how Claudette will manufacture back office operations!But what if there are no assets.....
My friend was also calling me during the time it was on but what I could see is they said some things about the former attorneys (Ulrich). Saying something about a large group of investors trying to recover the stolen BTC (probably RAG) and that Johann is probably in Brazil. Also they showed some video of Cheri writing on a whiteboard.Ooh shoot deets
They can chop off all his fingers... if they do get the keys to any MTI wallets they will be empty.What is your theory regarding JS. I mean if its all over the internet that only you have the password to the wallet, Sao Paulo is the last place to flee to. They have next level mafia who will chop your fingers and toes till you give the wallet key and make you dissapear for good.
Was the email to JS planned to lure him out of rsa?
I still find it difficult to believe these clowns could mastermind a pissup in a brewery, never mind a billion Rand scam.I've said before the various elements cooked up a business model using skills and experience from their various undertakings to build a mega-con,probably over tea at Cheri's weekend presentations for MDC
Like Oceans Eleven style.
Johann's IT background - I say this loosely,he's probably a desktop drone
Cheri on marketing/media
Clynt for silent partner mystery
Monica to clean Cheri's boots and echo mom's sentiments
Then some salespeople to start preaching the gospel like Rich,Joel
And a little seed capital courtesy of some profiteering nuggets
Pieces are there,needs ClooneyI still find it difficult to believe these clowns could mastermind a pissup in a brewery, never mind a billion Rand scam.
I wonder if they didn’t have help from the Bells, or someone else with more than Lindt between the ears.
You know what's KAK FUNNY about this... The timeline.That is what really $i**s^s me off. The assets have almost all been taken by the inner circle. That is my biggest problem with the provisional liquidation. I cannot stomach the idea of lindbolletjies etc etc getting away with more btc. I had hoped that they would clamp down on everything. On the other hand, allowing MTI to operate as normal might be illuminating; I wonder how Claudette will manufacture back office operations!
Perhaps Clynton. He’s been very much in the background. He also seems more like the type.Pieces are there,needs Clooney
Clynton maybe? Heard from some that he's a proper sharptooth shark
Too bad he's not aware of lizaan,the old age home supershill![]()
Words on Wealth: Huge losses on the cards for unsuspecting MTI investors
The more I read about Mirror Trading International (MTI), the more doubtful I become that its investors will retrieve their money.www.iol.co.za

MTI are liars and we cannot trust any of their comms.Also the fact that Nerina Steynberg hasn't put out a missing person report for Johann, shows she plays a bigger role in all of this than we think.
The thing is, if the company is insolvent then it is insolvent. To not liquidate the company means you really don't expect there to be any meaningful assets. In fact a liquidation can't happen if their are no assets.
A proper process will see that firstly, directors are delinquent and can be held personally liable. Secondly, directors, officers both appointed and de facto have acquired assets from ill gotten gains and those assets can be attached. There is probably a good bit that can done in that regard.
Monies withdrawn, lets even say in excess initial investment as opposed to all, can be clawed back.
What can't be clawed back is of course the missing bitcoin, that is if it is missing in the first instance. Probably a bit of both.