Mirror (non)Trading International 3 - Freemasons,Russians,and no bitcoins

Status
Not open for further replies.

RedViking

Nord of the South
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
58,158
Anyone have the clip and time stamp where Cheri looked surprised at Johan when she saw he is unshaven and in a different location..
 

quovadis

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
11,037
If the Judge believes it then its a finding and if Jxhxnn is not in court to dispute it then the Judge isn't going to take it further. Its a civil matter.
Of course they have a legal basis to consider it a ponzi. It is as simple as submitting to the judge all the shilling videos. Case dismissed.
Yes, it's IF IF IF IF IF IF IF. So it's an IF until the IF is resolved. Making decisions BASED on the IF and investors limiting their claims based on that IF is problematic.
 

expedite

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
666
@reg4812. I am not able to answer this, but in addition to legal procedure and ethics, would there not be tax implications to consider? SARS can't tax you on an imaginary balance in MTI back offices but I imagine if liquidators use that imaginary amount and pay you out based on that, then SARS would take that as income or profit. [A bit like the Cheshire cat; now it's there. Now it's gone!]
If you received it SARS can and will tax you, regardless of if you obtained it legally or not.
 

Snyper564

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
15,343
If you received it SARS can and will tax you, regardless of if you obtained it legally or not.
Yup thanks to the MP Finance case (AKA KRION PONZI)


"MP Finance Group CC (In Liquidation) v C finally decided that the proceeds of unlawful activities and/or receipts are taxable, provided that the taxpayer had an intention to appropriate the proceeds for his own use and benefit."

Not getting away from SARS that easily YOU SHILLS!
 

expedite

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
666
A simple-minded question: Who now IS MTI? If it is accepted as a Pty then presumably Nerina (?) and Clynton but if FSCA finds that it was a collective, then would it be the board of directors?
There is only one other director, even though her appointment was never communicated to CIPC and the details of her appointment has not been made public.
There are seemingly other de facto directors, but that assertion is still untested.
We don't have access to the share register, but unless Nerina is a shareholder then she is nothing in terms of the Act.
 

Snyper564

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
15,343
There is only one other director, even though her appointment was never communicated to CIPC and the details of her appointment has not been made public.
There are seemingly other de facto directors, but that assertion is still untested.
We don't have access to the share register, but unless Nerina is a shareholder then she is nothing in terms of the Act.
There are only 2 shareholders that I am aware of and they are joint 50-50 thats Johan and Clynton
 

expedite

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
666
There are only 2 shareholders that I am aware of and they are joint 50-50 thats Johan and Clynton
And perhaps even that is not formalized.
Incidentally, because Mr. Bepanthen is a shareholder and not a director, the company is not owner managed.
 

newby_investor

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
4,329
View attachment 984608


In other words, he is experienced in advertising and participating in ponzi schemes and learn something new every time....

/clever
Funny that. This guy seemed roughly the same age as me. I've never been (successfully) scammed.

Maybe I don't see dollar signs (or bitcoin signs anyway) and just throw logic (or scruples) to the wind. Imagine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top