Mirror Trading International

[expedite]

Andrew Caw has always played it on the down-low. During the collapse of BTCG he was silent. In doing this he gets overlooked time and time again. Do not underestimate his involvement with MTI and his continued "business" relationship with Cheri!!

That's the large lass I presume?

 

[soulie]

Late

 

[expedite]

The dude in question has a beard, then that makes it 6 out of 10. Like Iraq. Does that mean something?

 

[InvisibleMan1]

MTI Legal Department Head - NON-Practicing Attorney (drumroll....)

Leonard Wesley Gray - Legal Practice Council

lpc.org.za

Leonard Wesley Gray Attorney


Membership number: 28863

Area/Location:

Practicing:

No

 

[Cray]

Is Cheri attempting to disguise her voice? Not working

Yeah, Elizabeth Holmes tried that sh*t, didn't work out too well in the long run...

 

[soulie]

MTI Legal Department Head - NON-Practicing Attorney (drumroll....)

Leonard Wesley Gray - Legal Practice Council

lpc.org.za

Leonard Wesley Gray Attorney


Membership number: 28863

Area/Location:

Practicing:

No

He doesnt have to be practicing to issue a summons , as long as he hasnt been struck off the roll , or terminated , he can still use another lawyer under him if required in court or he can reapply after the summons if he wants to go to court he has 30 days to do so,

 

[InvisibleMan1]

He doesnt have to be practicing to issue a summons , as long as he hasnt been struck off the roll , or terminated , he can still use another lawyer under him if required in court or he can reapply after the summons if he wants to go to court he has 30 days to do so,

A multi-billion rand company using a non-practicing attorney and one that just happens to be Cheri's ex-husband! What happened to ULRICH ROUX & ASSOCIATES?

 

[soulie]

A multi-billion rand company using a non-practicing attorney and one that just happens to be Cheri's ex-husband! What happened to ULRICH ROUX & ASSOCIATES?

Maybe terminated hahaha

 

[D@leW]

Hi guys I want to understand something..



A few if you have mentioned that “if you had the secret to making a fortune, why would you share it with anyone?”



Suppose for a second it’s all legit...when you get a cut of everyone’s investment, you would make a bigger fortune than just going at it alone wouldn’t you?

Not in the long term. Assuming it was legit at some point your trading volume becomes too big and the strategy no longer works. Arguably that would have happen long ago. You can't make the profits they are making with such few trades with small price movements without huge positions which will move the market sufficiently that the strategy will no longer work. You can ultimately make more profit with this uber-bot with a bit of patients and a small loan. But that of course assumes the existence of the uber-bot, which we've thoroughly disproved.

 

[quovadis]

He doesnt have to be practicing to issue a summons , as long as he hasnt been struck off the roll , or terminated , he can still use another lawyer under him if required in court or he can reapply after the summons if he wants to go to court he has 30 days to do so,

He would be a moron to sue anyone though as he can’t just rely on “because bot, video, proprietary”.

 

[soulie]

He would be a moron to sue anyone though as he can’t just rely on “because bot, video, proprietary”.

Its complicated .only an attorney would know .he doesnt have to sue .he can summons a person to state their case (basically you will need to spend money on a lawyer)about whatever allegations .then your lawyer and his lawyer have a powwow about the problem and decide what to do .if he does summons you and you ignore it (summons doesnt have to allways be given to you .he can summons your house if its in your name by sticking it to the front gate .door etc .depends on district and sheriff .)if you ignore it and dont respond .he has 3 months to go further (if he wants to )then he can issue a judgement against you (and sit back and wait to see what happens )if hes good natured he may leave it at that .but i presume it will cost you money to remove the judgement(that may be all hes interested in )any practising attorneys here .i believe it falls under the district laws though .i may be wrong .but thats what i was told years ago .about a similar thing..

 

[quovadis]

Its complicated .only an attorney would know .he doesnt have to sue .he can summons a person to state their case (basically you will need to spend money on a lawyer)about whatever allegations .then your lawyer and his lawyer have a powwow about the problem and decide what to do .if he does summons you and you ignore it (summons doesnt have to allways be given to you .he can summons your house if its in your name by sticking it to the front gate .door etc .depends on district and sheriff .)if you ignore it and dont respond .he has 3 months to go further (if he wants to )then he can issue a judgement against you (and sit back and wait to see what happens )if hes good natured he may leave it at that .but i presume it will cost you money to remove the judgement(that may be all hes interested in )any practising attorneys here .i believe it falls under the district laws though .i may be wrong .but thats what i was told years ago .about a similar problem.

MTI would still require a cause of action. If they’re saying someone said they’re a Ponzi and they disagree and it reaches a court why would they want to ventilate that as public record and open themselves up for discovery where they have to actually provide evidence to the contrary?

 

[Bandersnatch]

Hearing rumours of unscheduled scheduled maintenance?

 

[soulie]

MTI would still require a cause of action. If they’re saying someone said they’re a Ponzi and they disagree and it reaches a court why would they want to ventilate that as public record and open themselves up for discovery where they have to actually provide evidence to the contrary?

Doesnt have to be about a ponzi /pyramid etc or about MTI even .he can summons a person because he called someone a bad name .or fat or ugly etc .he can tie you up for years and it costs him nothing but everytime the person being summonsed will need a lawyer (costs money)many years ago someone slandered LG on hellopeter .fortunately he apologised and they dropped it but only after being threatened .big thing is dont get personal .it could cost money i can gaurantee they have as many screen shots of this thread as what mybb has on them.

 

[quovadis]

Doesnt have to be about a ponzi /pyramid etc or about MTI even .he can summons a person because he called someone a bad name .or fat or ugly etc .he can tie you up for years and it costs him nothing but everytime the person being summonsed will need a lawyer (costs money)many years ago someone slandered LG on hellopeter .fortunately he apologised and they dropped it but only after being threatened .big thing is dont get personal .it could cost money i can gaurantee they have as many screen shots of this thread as what mybb has on them.

Like I said, it depends on the cause and grounds to do so. Courts generally frown on frivolous motions and it doesn’t take much reading to respond to a motion and represent yourself. Nothing is more embarrassing than a lawyer losing to a layman.

 

[r00igev@@r]

Andrew Caw has always played it on the down-low. During the collapse of BTCG he was silent. In doing this he gets overlooked time and time again. Do not underestimate his involvement with MTI and his continued "business" relationship with Cheri!!
View attachment 927177

The little scammer has his mommy fronting him in the founders pool. She also does this: https://www.prestigeawards.co.za/ Probably does not donate any of the money she gets.
She also writes stuff like this: https://www.biznews.com/mailbox/2020/07/25/fear

 

[soulie]

Like I said, it depends on the cause and grounds to do so. Courts generally frown on frivolous motions and it doesn’t take much reading to respond to a motion and represent yourself. Nothing is more embarrassing than a lawyer losing to a layman.

the thing is -be carefull with comments .post proof and freely available articles but watch the slander that can be personal .some lawyers will laugh it off others may not .nobody really knows who is the legal team .thats all im trying to say be carefull with what you post
There are eyes everywhere.enough complaints to admin about personal attacks etc could get this thread in a pickle

 

[r00igev@@r]

Doesnt have to be about a ponzi /pyramid etc or about MTI even .he can summons a person because he called someone a bad name .or fat or ugly etc .he can tie you up for years and it costs him nothing but everytime the person being summonsed will need a lawyer (costs money)many years ago someone slandered LG on hellopeter .fortunately he apologised and they dropped it but only after being threatened .big thing is dont get personal .it could cost money i can gaurantee they have as many screen shots of this thread as what mybb has on them.

How can you prove a screenshot as not being fake?

 

[r00igev@@r]

A multi-billion rand company using a non-practicing attorney and one that just happens to be Cheri's ex-husband! What happened to ULRICH ROUX & ASSOCIATES?

I'd love to know if they advised and went with Johann and Cheri to the FCSA meeting where Johann demonstrated the proof of his trading to the investigator using his powerpoint deck.

 

[soulie]

How can you prove a screenshot as not being fake?

You cant,unless maybe the original is still out there .i dont know