I don't like RAF, but I agree with this. Pay one, pay all, regardless. Even drunk pedestrians. Especially the ones with no SABC TV license.agree with this. If a pedestrian is hit on a highway and they survive they can still claim even though they were illegally walking on a highway. same same.
If not feeling a rats ass for unlicensed drivers on our roads getting themselves crippled makes me absurd - then that is a badge I'll wear with pride.You have no business posting absurd ramblings, but you do it any way. Go figure. !
Perhaps you should work on your analogies.......and its give a rat's ass, not feeling one. Should you wish to be PC, use don't give a rat's patootie, of course you don't need a license to make use of the urban dictionary but in your case I would make an exception.If not feeling a rats ass for unlicensed drivers on our roads getting themselves crippled makes me absurd - then that is a badge I'll wear with pride.
you can’t renew your learners regardless. Is there an issue with taking the license?
We get that, You say the blame is 50 /50. Well, can you share the Footage? might be we see it different, either for your friend or against him, Simply do not know as we have no idea what happened?Nice to have, but unfortunately you can have all the footage in the world, all the licenses in the world, and adhere to all the rules to be 100% not to blame, it doesn't undo
and it doesn't put food and shelter on the table for his wife and baby boy.
- a broken collar bone
- 2x broken arms
- broken and cracked ribs
- crushed knee
- broken femur
- abdominal hematoma
Life is tough. One day it's a newspaper report, next day an unlicensed driver, and the very next day it could be you.
I really urge you to reconsider the value proposition of using a DECENT firm of attorneys to manage your friends RAF claim.Thank you for the responses guys.
For the record, the taxi driver and vehicle was licensed, and PDP, but how he got it is anyone's guess because he clearly cannot see very well, or couldn't be bothered to look, or was distracted. Although they do test eyes as part of the process, it doesn't mean that he used them at all. Agreed that the taxi driver could proceed with a civil claim for damages, he needs to be prepared for it as well.
Bike was not insured, there is no way that he could afford it.
I will be advising him that he needs to proceed with a RAF claim regardless, but not to bank on getting it paid, or to invest anything in the process other than the application itself. I am not a fan of using lawyers for this, to me they add doubtful value and take a huge percentage of the payout (if any). Those that work on a contingency basis take even more.
I hope that those that read this post and who drive without a license are encouraged to get legally on the road, and to maintain it, my friend is definately in a very bad position at the moment, both health-wise and financially, and the future does not look too bright for him.
What do you classify as "speed"?From past experience big damages on bikes means speed was a factor.
If you fall at 60kph while in standing traffic you will pick up heavy damage. If you do 60 on your own, you will slide a bit, not heavy damage i would imagine. So it is relative to where you are. Is it legal to split lanes doing 60 while cars are standing still? Yes it is, but is it right, Hell no, that is daft.What do you classify as "speed"?
Thank you, I am so glad that some folk can read, and have the cognitive ability to respond properly.Wife was in a car accident a few years ago. Didn't have a driver's license at the time and the Raf did pay out.
He makes very valid points though, unless your friend has a war chest to fight the RAF on his own dime?Thank you for your response. You haven't answered any of the questions which I posed though.
Are you an ambulance chaser?