Not if it's something you have to take every year.Here’s a question for you.
The moment it’s not considered experimental and approved by a government (which most don’t trust) will you be taking it without question?
Not if it's something you have to take every year.Here’s a question for you.
The moment it’s not considered experimental and approved by a government (which most don’t trust) will you be taking it without question?
Why has the Indian government pulled it from the treatment regime then?
Well some here are laughing at that notion claiming we should be seeing those long term effects because of the number of participants. It's like they're incapable of seeing we're dealing with two different kinds of data.You are right, in the context of potential complications to the person down the line time could certainly play a deeper part.
I’m not really sure even five years is enough for that though and likely as with many things discovered over the decades it’s not really something we can account for perfectly anyway.
That I can kinda agree with. The only problem I have with it is that we are already seeing conflicting data that doesn't support the initial 90%+ efficacy claims. Time usually sorts out such inconsistencies.As for the initial administration you don’t need time for that, just test data.
That's misconstruing things a bit. Those drugs do not have unknown side effects. In contrast taking the vaccine is like a lucky packet.Because every single drug has side effects and contraindications and those very same people generally hard ignore those without thinking twice.
But for some reason they balk against this far more important one.
****
Also the very same people happily and very experimentally would administer ivermectin to themselves because someone on a WhatsApp group said so.
No it has full approval with over 4 billion doses. You're thinking of off label use and yes, while that is experimental it doesn't alter the safety profile.Random question.
Isn’t Ivermectin for use by humans also experimental?
Why has the WHO called for protective status even if it's effective against Covid? There are many irrational decisions we don't know the answers to.Why has the Indian government pulled it from the treatment regime then?
.
No it has full approval with over 4 billion doses. You're thinking of off label use and yes, while that is experimental it doesn't alter the safety profile.
Why has the WHO called for protective status even if it's effective against Covid? There are many irrational decisions we don't know the answers to.
Not if it's something you have to take every year.
To each his own.Yeah that wouldn’t be ideal.
Then again I’m the kind of person who would sign up for replacing all my insides with nano machines tomorrow if it was possible, even if I needed to have an oil change every six months.
It's very easy for propagandists to paint all detractors with the same brush, cherry picking the very worst objections and then making it appear like everybody who objects is objecting for the stupid reason.All in all I can understand people having reservations about it being experimental.
As long as the reasons for not wanting to line up and get the shot has nothing to do with mind control or 5G or some other kak and is based in reasonable caution I can accept that.
Personally the risk of the vaccine is a mere molecule compared to the greater issues of getting Covid in the first place, but also just the quality of life lost overall while perpetually remaining in this state of being.
It's very easy for propagandists to paint all detractors with the same brush, cherry picking the very worst objections and then making it appear like everybody who objects is objecting for the stupid reason.
I didn't say that they didn't exist. In your case, once you were provided an explanation, you saw the reasons and were able to accept them. But for every one of you, there's 10 other idiots going around refusing to even listen. Just take a look at the IVM thread for proof of this in action.It’s not even that I’ve sadly directly experienced exactly those kind of nut jobs.
But yes it does distort one’s view and then brushing everyone the same.
At least the conversation here is logical and reasonable.
I didn't say that they didn't exist. In your case, once you were provided an explanation, you saw the reasons and were able to accept them. But for every one of you, there's 10 other idiots going around refusing to even listen. Just take a look at the IVM thread for proof of this in action.![]()

You don't wanna know.You’ll have to link me, don’t see anything by that name but could be Tapatalk sucking.
Then again I’m not sure I want to know.![]()
You don't wanna know.
Ivermectin: balance of evidence shows no benefit against Covid-19
Full article: https://www.groundup.org.za/article/ivermectin-flops-largest-trial-yet/ While it’s too soon to say that the drug is useless, it has clearly been overhyped Ivermectin has been touted as the wonder drug solution to the Covid-19 crisis. Several trials have suggested it may have some...mybroadband.co.za

I don't know. Would depend on what I can afford and if it would make our quality of life better or worse.Ok so if your 5yr old child was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, considering that for the rest of her life she will be injecting herself with insulin 4 times a day. Will have multiple acute admissions to hospital in ketoacidosis. Is likely to develop complications including blindness, renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, cardiovascular disease.
What would you pay for such a medication? One yrs salary, two years, five years?
The simple answer is if you found this cure you would have the most valuable drug known to humanity.I don't know. Would depend on what I can afford and if it would make our quality of life better or worse.
The question is can you make more from it than from a continuous treatment? What happens once the patent expires and others start undercutting you to regain a piece of the pie and your cure starts costing as much as the treatment?
I just don't think big pharma not coming up with cures is down to just ability.
The simple answer is if you found this cure you would have the most valuable drug known to humanity.
Does insulin still have a valid patent?
www.vox.com
Only for a certain amount of time. You've introduced competition into the market that would eventually make the overall profit less.The simple answer is if you found this cure you would have the most valuable drug known to humanity.
Does insulin still have a valid patent?
I will take IVM provided it is prescribed by a doctor if I contract Covid. I know of a doctor that is treating Covid patients with IVM and successfully. I won't be waiting for all this noise about its approval --- it IS already approved for emergency use in SA.The moment it’s not considered experimental and approved by a government (which most don’t trust) will you be taking it without question?
Because the WHO pressurised them to do so. And some states in India just thumbed their nose at the National government ruling as well!Why has the Indian government pulled it from the treatment regime then?
Because they were asked by the US government? Operation Warpspeed.IT also begs the question as to why certain big pharma companies moved so quickly to develop "vaccines" for this virus?