Mthethwa asks SA Rugby to take action after eight players refuse to bend the knee in support of BLM in England

Brenden_E

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,407
Lot of ignorance here (again, I'm not insulting you with that word).

BLM started as movement specifically against police brutality against black Americans. Now the movement has evolved worldwide to specific geographies in that region for example. the police killings of black Britons in the UK.

It's not a movement about "Africans in Africa". Although by in large, the group itself seems to be expanding its scope about black people worldwide.

George Floyd is one of many unarmed black men deaths. Like I mean many, we don't hear about it in SA all the time but when you're here, it's constant. The protests took fever pitch because in a short time span

1) Ahmaud Arbery was killed
  • There was no accountability here until a video went viral months later
2) Breonna Taylor was killed
  • Months later still trying to charge the officers

Regardless, there's hardly any officers who end up actually going to jail. There is zero accountability and reinforced by the police unions here. Add the viral video of GF, mass unemployment from corona and poof. Yo usaw the end result
No idea who these people are, so I google.

Breonna Taylor was involved with a druggie, they tried to raid her house to look for controlled substances, and her boyfriend Kenneth Walker opened fire on police officers first. The police then proceeded to fire 20 shots into the apartment. Damn, who would've thought police would fire back when you shoot at them.

This is the poster child for BLM, people. LOL!

 

boramk

Bammed
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
9,959
Last post, I have to get some work done today :ROFL:

The entire discussion is about violence in a culture so that's what I'm going to reference. Petty, nonviolent crime wasn't part of the discussion at all, what are you even on about?

No this was the stem of the discussion. It was about crime. You made it about violent crime to disprove a point I was never making.

Capture.PNG

Compared to the USA, India does not have high economic growth. The average African American has a plethora of opportunities compared to the average Indian.

Not true. India has a significantly higher GDP growth rate than the US.

Well, yea it's easy to say black South Africans are more likely to rape. It's called rape culture for a reason. Many African men believe they own and have dominion over women.

I wonder if you could bravely claim that in a room full of black people? If its easier for you to think South African men are rapists because X instead of thinking deeper about it then yea...

Anyways, it was a nice chat everyone!
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    23.2 KB · Views: 10

Brenden_E

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,407
I wonder if you could bravely claim that in a room full of black people? If its easier for you to think South African men are rapists because X instead of thinking deeper about it then yea...

Anyways, it was a nice chat everyone!
Well clearly not, because they will violently assault me. THAT'S THE POINT, LOL!
 

CaptainOblivious

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2019
Messages
2,535
Last post, I have to get some work done today :ROFL:



No this was the stem of the discussion. It was about crime. You made it about violent crime to disprove a point I was never making.

View attachment 896266



Not true. India has a significantly higher GDP growth rate than the US.



I wonder if you could bravely claim that in a room full of black people? If its easier for you to think South African men are rapists because X instead of thinking deeper about it then yea...

Anyways, it was a nice chat everyone!
vob8ndu1ty551.png
 

koeks525

Executive Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
5,315
The rugby players who did not "take the knee" weren't politically smart; they should have taken the knee even if it is something they do not necessarily agree with. Had they all taken the knee, there wouldn't have been all this drama and outrage. It is like people who make controversial tweets and statements, then act surprised when things blow up in their faces (or time lines)

BLM died a long time ago; the cause has been hijacked by politicians and fake news media. Same thing happened to Fees Must Fall... a legitimate cause which got hijacked by politicians and fake news media. We can all take the knee, create petitions, and protest; unfortunately, these actions do very little in addressing issues faced with society.
 

boramk

Bammed
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
9,959
No idea who these people are, so I google.

Breonna Taylor was involved with a druggie, they tried to raid her house to look for controlled substances, and her boyfriend Kenneth Walker opened fire on police officers first. The police then proceeded to fire 20 shots into the apartment. Damn, who would've thought police would fire back when you shoot at them.

This is the poster child for BLM, people. LOL!


My friend, I really have to go but have to point this out, once again highlighting your lack of depth in thinking.

The boyfriend is a drug dealer.
There was no announcement of the warrant, the police just started ramming the door.
The armed boyfriend started shooting.
Breonna get killed in the shots back.

The whole case has involved the police's use of no knock warrants. It got an innocent person killed. She didn't deserve to die just because her boyfriend was a drug dealer. There was no reason to falsify information the way the police did either.

I'm pointing this out to answer the guy's question why GF's killing was a big deal. Not to have a discussion about no knock warrants.
 

Brenden_E

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,407
Last post, I have to get some work done today :ROFL:



No this was the stem of the discussion. It was about crime. You made it about violent crime to disprove a point I was never making.

View attachment 896266
And this requires a separate post because @boramk claims we don't know math and he does.
He believes 6.8% growth of $2000 is more than 2.9% growth of $60 000

What to say to this level of genius. I am humbled.
 

Flanders

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
14,726
Had they all taken the knee, there wouldn't have been all this drama and outrage.

Strongly disagree. Sportsmen (and women of course) are role models.

Look, mommy. He's taking a knee. I want to be like him...

*cancer intensifies*
 

boramk

Bammed
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
9,959
And this requires a separate post because @boramk claims we don't know math and he does.
He believes 6.8% growth of $2000 is more than 2.9% growth of $60 000

What to say to this level of genius. I am humbled.

I'm honestly astounded at your stupidity. Like genuinely its embarrassing - are you really trying to explain to me how bases work when you couldn't even get proportionality with your graph earlier today?

India's economy has a higher growth rate than the US. Nobody counts GDP growth in absolute $ terms. My undergrad is in Econ before you decide to say otherwise.
 

Brenden_E

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,407
I'm honestly astounded at your stupidity. Like genuinely its embarrassing - are you really trying to explain to me how bases work when you couldn't even get proportionality with your graph earlier today?

India's economy has a higher growth rate than the US. Nobody counts GDP growth in absolute $ terms. My undergrad is in Econ before you decide to say otherwise.

2,009.98 USD per Capita in India
62,794.59 USD per Capita in USA

USA has average growth rate of 3% and india 7% over the last few years. Let's work it out.

$2,009.98 * .07 = $140.7 more money per year, per person in India
$62,794.59 * .03 = $1,883.8 more money per year, per person in USA

You went in hard, fam. Going to difficult to gracefully back down from this one.
:X3:
 

boramk

Bammed
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
9,959
2,009.98 USD per Capita in India
62,794.59 USD per Capita in USA

USA has average growth rate of 3% and india 7% over the last few years. Let's work it out.

$2,009.98 * .07 = $140.7 more money per year, per person in India
$62,794.59 * .03 = $18,838.3 more money per year, per person in USA

You went in hard, fam. Going to difficult to gracefully back down from this one.
:X3:

My dude, you have to stop, this is a trainwreck :laugh: why are you explaining to me how bases work? I'm not even disputing that. It's like a child trying to explain to a pilot how flying works because he played GTA.

"Plane goes up in the air like wooosh!"
Yea I know that.

1. Economic growth rate is measured in % not absolute $ terms, if it were we wouldn't categorize any of the high growth countries as "high growth countries"
  • Even if the US grew at 0.5%, they'd add more in $ terms than India still but that doesn't detract from the fact that the US would be in economic trouble and now considered "high growth" BECAUSE THAT'S NOT HOW WE MEASURE ECONOMIC GROWTH
2. You can't grow per capita like that since it doesn't factor in populations deltas, the actual calculation for capita is the GDP of one year divided by the population of that year therefore the growth rate per capita would be different than as a whole
3. You made a math error, but I expected that

You went in hard, fam. Going to difficult to gracefully back down from this one.
 

Brenden_E

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,407
My dude, you have to stop, this is a trainwreck :laugh: why are you explaining to me how bases work? I'm not even disputing that. It's like a child trying to explain to a pilot how flying works because he played GTA.

"Plane goes up in the air like wooosh!"
Yea I know that.

1. Economic growth rate is measured in % not absolute $ terms, if it were we wouldn't categorize any of the high growth countries as "high growth countries"
  • Even if the US grew at 0.5%, they'd add more in $ terms than India still but that doesn't detract from the fact that the US would be in economic trouble and now considered "high growth" BECAUSE THAT'S NOT HOW WE MEASURE ECONOMIC GROWTH
2. You can't grow per capita like that since it doesn't factor in populations deltas, the actual calculation for capita is the GDP of one year divided by the population of that year therefore the growth rate per capita would be different than as a whole
3. You made a math error, but I expected that

You went in hard, fam. Going to difficult to gracefully back down from this one.
You claim Indians are better off with $140.7 more per person per year, than Americans with $1,883.8 per year.
Please explain to us non economic undergrads how exactly that works.

And I fixed the typo on the period immediately after posting. Derp.
 

Vrotappel

Bulls fan
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
25,982
Lot of ignorance here (again, I'm not insulting you with that word).

BLM started as movement specifically against police brutality against black Americans. Now the movement has evolved worldwide to specific geographies in that region for example. the police killings of black Britons in the UK.

It's not a movement about "Africans in Africa". Although by in large, the group itself seems to be expanding its scope about black people worldwide.

George Floyd is one of many unarmed black men deaths. Like I mean many, we don't hear about it in SA all the time but when you're here, it's constant. The protests took fever pitch because in a short time span

1) Ahmaud Arbery was killed
  • There was no accountability here until a video went viral months later
2) Breonna Taylor was killed
  • Months later still trying to charge the officers

Regardless, there's hardly any officers who end up actually going to jail. There is zero accountability and reinforced by the police unions here. Add the viral video of GF, mass unemployment from corona and poof. Yo usaw the end result
50 killed a day in SA. 2 killed in half a year in USA. Makes sense.

But funny thing - when a black cop kills no real problem. Why is that?

?
 

Brenden_E

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,407
My dude, you have to stop, this is a trainwreck :laugh: why are you explaining to me how bases work? I'm not even disputing that. It's like a child trying to explain to a pilot how flying works because he played GTA.

"Plane goes up in the air like wooosh!"
Yea I know that.

1. Economic growth rate is measured in % not absolute $ terms, if it were we wouldn't categorize any of the high growth countries as "high growth countries"
  • Even if the US grew at 0.5%, they'd add more in $ terms than India still but that doesn't detract from the fact that the US would be in economic trouble and now considered "high growth" BECAUSE THAT'S NOT HOW WE MEASURE ECONOMIC GROWTH
2. You can't grow per capita like that since it doesn't factor in populations deltas, the actual calculation for capita is the GDP of one year divided by the population of that year therefore the growth rate per capita would be different than as a whole
3. You made a math error, but I expected that

You went in hard, fam. Going to difficult to gracefully back down from this one.
Google corroborates my findings.

1597862571932.png
1597862597633.png

I'd really like to hear your explanation of how the Indian is better off with his paltry $100 more per year. Come now, stop deflecting.
 

Cray

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
34,549
No idea who these people are, so I google.

Breonna Taylor was involved with a druggie, they tried to raid her house to look for controlled substances, and her boyfriend Kenneth Walker opened fire on police officers first. The police then proceeded to fire 20 shots into the apartment. Damn, who would've thought police would fire back when you shoot at them.

This is the poster child for BLM, people. LOL!
So police get the wrong house and execute a no knock warrant against a woman who once dated a drug dealer. When her current boyfriend tries to defend himself against people he thinks are intruders they shoot and kill a her in her own home...

And you have no problem with any of that?
 

boramk

Bammed
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
9,959
Google corroborates my findings.

View attachment 896306
View attachment 896308

I'd really like to hear your explanation of how the Indian is better off with his paltry $100 more per year. Come now, stop deflecting.

Nobody disputed the growth figures. Nobody disputed the GDP numbers. I'm literally telling you that you are using things incorrectly :ROFL:

- GDP growth rate =/= GDP growth rate per capita
- India is growing faster than the US is a fact

This is how bad at math you are, you are so hung up on the absolute $ figure you can't even comprehend how compounded growth looks like even from a low base, let alone the fact that Economists DON'T say "The US has a higher growth rate because it added more in $ terms".

Imagine trying to tell someone with a degree in something that you know more than them in that subject matter? This is why you are stupid af. And you don't back down from people that actually have knowledge in what they are talking about, you just keep digging your hole.
 
Top