Sign up with GoogleI know its a long shot but does anybody know of a way to use multithreading on ALL traffic.. for example even browsing. Perhaps an intermediate software router that will split traffic over threads. Maybe this way the service can become usable due to the wonderful effects of multithreading on their little bandwidth throttling mechanism.
-
Ask a question and get free supportUnlock new privileges and see hidden discussionsWin prizes and earn reputation
-
Question of the day ~ How often do you braai?
-
Afristay giveaway.Win a 2-night stay for two people at an establishment of your choice with R1,000 in spending money. Enter here.
multi threaded browsing. how?
- Thread starter gripen
- Start date
In a way, much of the browsing is already multi-threaded in nature - if a page contains multiple images, they are downloaded simultaneously.
There used to be a registry setting, where one could specify the maximum number of simultaneous connections MS IE could handle.
<hr noshade size="1"><center><i><font size="1">
My views are mine, and mine alone.</i></font id="size1"></center>
There used to be a registry setting, where one could specify the maximum number of simultaneous connections MS IE could handle.
<hr noshade size="1"><center><i><font size="1">
My views are mine, and mine alone.</i></font id="size1"></center>
Yeah..I looked at this a few weeks back. It's poiintless because, like anakin said, browsing is already sortof multithreaded. Besides..with me being a victim of their new bandwidth managment system that's being "tested" on 256k users, I can safely say that multithreaded downloads help fsckall, 256K seems to be hard capped at 64K. Some **** at Sentech probably fscked up with his calculations again...
Well apparently Sentech was (or is.. you never know with those call centre monkeys) giving each thread/connection a bandwidth share (say 7KB/sec) and then the threads would add to max out the connection (bah. prove it) so now the fix is to spread the bandwidth share (7KB/sec) over all your connections. And this is (direct from a call centre monkey couple weeks back) supposed to speed things up?
The only way I can get it to work at present is to open each topic in a new window. What a pain!
<hr noshade size="1">
Donn Edwards
Why is ADSL like a Cheeseburger? Find out at http://privacy.4mg.com
“Free-market advocates often warn that the only thing worse than a state-controlled monopoly is a privatised one.”
<hr noshade size="1">
Donn Edwards
Why is ADSL like a Cheeseburger? Find out at http://privacy.4mg.com
“Free-market advocates often warn that the only thing worse than a state-controlled monopoly is a privatised one.”
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by greedyflyza</i>
<br />Well apparently Sentech was (or is.. you never know with those call centre monkeys) giving each thread/connection a bandwidth share (say 7KB/sec) and then the threads would add to max out the connection (bah. prove it) so now the fix is to spread the bandwidth share (7KB/sec) over all your connections. And this is (direct from a call centre monkey couple weeks back) supposed to speed things up?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Not a chance. 256K hard capped at 64K. Whether flashget is running 5 threads or 1, I only get 64K and browsing becomes unbareable even though I'm supposed to have another 192K free to work with.
<br />Well apparently Sentech was (or is.. you never know with those call centre monkeys) giving each thread/connection a bandwidth share (say 7KB/sec) and then the threads would add to max out the connection (bah. prove it) so now the fix is to spread the bandwidth share (7KB/sec) over all your connections. And this is (direct from a call centre monkey couple weeks back) supposed to speed things up?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Not a chance. 256K hard capped at 64K. Whether flashget is running 5 threads or 1, I only get 64K and browsing becomes unbareable even though I'm supposed to have another 192K free to work with.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by donn</i>
<br />The only way I can get it to work at present is to open each topic in a new window. What a pain!
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
As indicated earlier use Mozilla Firefox ;-) .. Middle click opens in a new tab ... THE ONLY way to read these forums ;-)
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1"><div align="right">8:00 Thursday 26 August 2004 is <font color="red">D-Day</font id="red">....
<s> 16 17 18 19 20 <font color="green">21 20</font id="green"></s> 23 24 25 <font color="red"><b>26</b></font id="red">
</div id="right"></font id="size1">
<br />The only way I can get it to work at present is to open each topic in a new window. What a pain!
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
As indicated earlier use Mozilla Firefox ;-) .. Middle click opens in a new tab ... THE ONLY way to read these forums ;-)
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1"><div align="right">8:00 Thursday 26 August 2004 is <font color="red">D-Day</font id="red">....
<s> 16 17 18 19 20 <font color="green">21 20</font id="green"></s> 23 24 25 <font color="red"><b>26</b></font id="red">
</div id="right"></font id="size1">
loosecannon
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
- Messages
- 731
hey guys it is still cheaper than a 64kbs telkom leased line ...
/me ducks and runs ....
they are farquing pathetic ...
carrier pigeon is afaster mode and does not need LOS
of course the lag is quite severe ...
/me ducks and runs ....
they are farquing pathetic ...
carrier pigeon is afaster mode and does not need LOS
of course the lag is quite severe ...
TheRoDent
Cool Ideas Rep
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2003
- Messages
- 6,218
Multithreaded browsing is tackling the problem from the wrong end, and impossible.
Imagine the load on poor RPM's webserver, if 6 separate threads tried to generate this thread from a database query, just so that you can get a decent response from the server. Multithreaded browsing would also only be possible on 'static' content, not dynamically generated content, since byte-range requests aren't possible on dynamically generated pages, such as these forums, or many websites.
Forget about the idea. Sentech should fix their PROBLEM, from THEIR side.
<center><h6> MyWireless <s>Hacks</s> Tweaks & Tech Info || Have you checked the fawking FAQ? <br /> <font color="red">Tired of Sentech's bad service? Want to compare speeds? We at least listen...</font id="red"></h6></center>
Imagine the load on poor RPM's webserver, if 6 separate threads tried to generate this thread from a database query, just so that you can get a decent response from the server. Multithreaded browsing would also only be possible on 'static' content, not dynamically generated content, since byte-range requests aren't possible on dynamically generated pages, such as these forums, or many websites.
Forget about the idea. Sentech should fix their PROBLEM, from THEIR side.
<center><h6> MyWireless <s>Hacks</s> Tweaks & Tech Info || Have you checked the fawking FAQ? <br /> <font color="red">Tired of Sentech's bad service? Want to compare speeds? We at least listen...</font id="red"></h6></center>
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by nonroker</i>
<br />regardt, you're going back in time boet 16 17 18 19 20 21 <b>20</b> 23 24 25 26 []
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Hehe. thanx for that nonroker ... Sentech's so slow these days one can be forgiven for thinking time is standing still or going backwards ;-)
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1"><div align="right">8:00 Thursday 26 August 2004 is <font color="red">D-Day</font id="red">....
<s> 16 17 18 19 20 <font color="green">21 22</font id="green"></s> 23 24 25 <font color="red"><b>26</b></font id="red">
</div id="right"></font id="size1">
<br />regardt, you're going back in time boet 16 17 18 19 20 21 <b>20</b> 23 24 25 26 [
]<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Hehe. thanx for that nonroker ... Sentech's so slow these days one can be forgiven for thinking time is standing still or going backwards ;-)
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1"><div align="right">8:00 Thursday 26 August 2004 is <font color="red">D-Day</font id="red">....
<s> 16 17 18 19 20 <font color="green">21 22</font id="green"></s> 23 24 25 <font color="red"><b>26</b></font id="red">
</div id="right"></font id="size1">
Just imagine uploads were downloads. Sheesh we would be so happy. I have hardly ever seen uploads go slow (when I release my P2P uploads). They always run rock solid. Well if the uploads slow down then you know something is really fcked. Seriously though, my uploads have always been really consistent and once when unleashed they even went up to 50KB/sec. Pity we cant say the same about downloads..
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by greedyflyza</i>
<br />Just imagine uploads were downloads. Sheesh we would be so happy. I have hardly ever seen uploads go slow (when I release my P2P uploads). They always run rock solid. Well if the uploads slow down then you know something is really fcked. Seriously though, my uploads have always been really consistent and once when unleashed they even went up to 50KB/sec. Pity we cant say the same about downloads..
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Not on the new patent pending 64k-hard-cap technology we seem to be graced with in the 256K bracket
--
256k with 64k-hard-cap(tm) technology
<br />Just imagine uploads were downloads. Sheesh we would be so happy. I have hardly ever seen uploads go slow (when I release my P2P uploads). They always run rock solid. Well if the uploads slow down then you know something is really fcked. Seriously though, my uploads have always been really consistent and once when unleashed they even went up to 50KB/sec. Pity we cant say the same about downloads..
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Not on the new patent pending 64k-hard-cap technology we seem to be graced with in the 256K bracket
--
256k with 64k-hard-cap(tm) technology