Brian_G
Honorary Master
And round and round we go...
Sjoe, what a reach and use of mental gymnastics to get this all from this section of the act:
View attachment 1761873
I really doubt that a "consumer" of "pirated content" can be held liable under this act.
It would've been sweeter if your mom was watching that on a WAKA app.Things must be really tough for Multichoice. Was at my mom's earlier and saw a multichoice ad on kyknet for reporting piracy
We're watching TNT2in FHD, but not using IPTVCurrently watching TNT 3 in FHD on IPTV![]()
As their prices have stayed high, we would not know, nè. Used their app recently, didn't work correctly, every other app worked perfectly on the same device. If we asked them to fix the app, would we use it, or would it be academic only.I'm wondering if it has any effect. Will any of those subscribers pay for the service or is this just an academic exercise?
Having tried at a friend's place, we doubt it's fixable. If Canal+ takes over, sure the app is the first thing they'll cancel, and replace it with their app, sporting a DSTV theme.. If we asked them to fix the app, would we use it, or would it be academic only.
Monochoice with their blinkers on, is convince that if they scare enough people, they will get to their 50million subscribers target.More fear mongering, they are get desperate....
I don't think we know half of it. Programmers that worked with their decoders say the hardware and code bases used is such that you can't change one thing without also making two other changes somewhere else or something like that. Some of it probably to do with their own proprietary encryption.Having tried at a friend's place, we doubt it's fixable. If Canal+ takes over, sure the app is the first thing they'll cancel, and replace it with their app, sporting a DSTV theme.
I don't think we know half of it. Programmers that worked with their decoders say the hardware and code bases used is such that you can't change one thing without also making two other changes somewhere else or something like that. Some of it probably to do with their own proprietary encryption.
This is why their decoders keep losing functionality and gaining bugs while some things they simply choose not to fix. In order to fix everything they'd need to go to a different base architecture which management probably won't approve.
Unfortunately this- and I work alongside one of their former employees. That code is a schitshow. The bug they gained was the audio one, they have tried to fix it for years to no avail.I don't think we know half of it. Programmers that worked with their decoders say the hardware and code bases used is such that you can't change one thing without also making two other changes somewhere else or something like that. Some of it probably to do with their own proprietary encryption.
This is why their decoders keep losing functionality and gaining bugs while some things they simply choose not to fix. In order to fix everything they'd need to go to a different base architecture which management probably won't approve.
Correct. Everything is fixed term contract based and people leave all the time, more so when they see what a dumpster fire the code is and they just leave. Also no benefits, no job security.And another angle - some feedback from (other?) programmers suggests a big part of the problem is they're all part-time, MC won't actually hire them.
Very stable environment that.. /s
I hope mybroadband is not following in News24 footsteps.What's worse is Mybb publishing such nonsense without a real legal perspective.
Unfortunately this- and I work alongside one of their former employees. That code is a schitshow. The bug they gained was the audio one, they have tried to fix it for years to no avail.