Multiple victims hospitalised after Las Vegas shooting

[Hamish McPanji]

Pfft. Why don't you look up Loomer's story about her burst tyre?

Don't try to lecture me, I am the master of e-peen oneupmanship.

Say it enough times, and you start believing it

 

[Xarog]

Say it enough times, and you start believing it

https://www.indy100.com/article/don...er-laura-loomer-tyres-slashed-twitter-7881376

 

[Hamish McPanji]

https://www.indy100.com/article/don...er-laura-loomer-tyres-slashed-twitter-7881376

And? Does that prove that there is a gag order?

It's quite simple , look at the actual evidence loomer provided. Not hard at all

 

[buka001]

If you want to find fault with Loomer's reporting, you're free to do so. But that in no way detracts from the fact that ZeroHedge reported Loomer's claims as Loomer's claims, which is factually accurate. The part that I'm interested in is the existence of a gag order and the cancelled interviews.



Actually it seems like you're already ignoring the content of my posts, so as you were.

Thank you for confirming that ZH has no editorial standard, no basic fact checking process or any level of quality control.

Effectively you have confirmed that ZH peddles what ever suits its conspiratorial narrative.

 

[Xarog]

And? Does that prove that there is a gag order?

It's quite simple , look at the actual evidence loomer provided. Not hard at all

Look carefully at the quotes and tell me where I actually said there was a gag order.

 

[Xarog]

Thank you for confirming that ZH has no editorial standard, no basic fact checking process or any level of quality control.

Effectively you have confirmed that ZH peddles what ever suits its conspiratorial narrative.

No, I effectively proved that ZH directly points to the sources of claims and allows people to draw their own conclusions.

http://www.zerohedge.com/node/13972

Please read. Grow a brain, learn to think for yourself.

 

[rietrot]

Bitch!!...you jumped the gun there. I was slowly working my way up to that.

Anyone seems to want to call themselves a reporter nowadays

That funniest part is Xarog believes her BS.

This highlights my point about ZH from earlier on perfectly.
You falsely assume everyone who reads it believes it 100%. That is completely false, as no one dispute any of your fact checking.
We just have this strange ability to read through BS and draw our oun conclusions rather than being spoonfed by a approved MSM source.

 

[buka001]

No, I effectively proved that ZH directly points to the sources of claims and allows people to draw their own conclusions.

http://www.zerohedge.com/node/13972

Please read. Grow a brain, learn to think for yourself.

No.

ZH perpetuates false conspiracies and lap up anything from any agitator it can find.

 

[Xarog]

No.

ZH perpetuates false conspiracies and lap up anything from any agitator it can find.

Well if you won't read their disclosure policy, then you can't really moan about what Zerohedge does or how it advises its readers to use its content because you are speaking from a position of ignorance.

So then why should I pay attention to what you say?

Edit: And the fact of the matter is that enough of Zerohedge's conspiracy theories turned out to be conspiracy fact such that it warrants paying attention to what sorts of wild theories they spin, anyway.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

No, I effectively proved that ZH directly points to the sources of claims and allows people to draw their own conclusions.

http://www.zerohedge.com/node/13972

Please read. Grow a brain, learn to think for yourself.

That's funny, considering that you are letting Loomer do the thinking for you.

Please show me the the evidence from her footage that there is a gag order. I personally don't see it from the footage displayed. Do you?

 

[Unhappy438]

Well, most MSM publications are conspiracy mongers by that definition, so one would expect that you don't read anything that they have to say.

This is your definition of MSM not mine. You think they are frauds and forward conspiratorial nonsense. You also think Zerohedge is on the same level as them, well at least you an i agree on Zerohedge.

Weird how you keep posting a source that you have admitted to on the above.

 

[Xarog]

That's funny, considering that you are letting Loomer do the thinking for you.

But I'm not.

Please show me the the evidence from her footage that there is a gag order. I personally don't see it from the footage displayed. Do you?

Show me where I said there actually is a gag order such that I would have to even answer such a question.

 

[Xarog]

This is your definition of MSM not mine. You think they are frauds and forward conspiratorial nonsense. You also think Zerohedge is on the same level as them, well at least you an i agree on Zerohedge.

Weird how you keep posting a source that you have admitted to on the above.

Weird how I also resort to using MSM sources. Weird how ZeroHedge does the same when appropriate. Sometimes you have to sift through rubbish to find diamonds.

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

Grow a brain, learn to think for yourself.

No.

Well, you led the horse to water, but it ain't thirsty :crylaugh:

 

[Unhappy438]

Weird how I also resort to using MSM sources. Weird how ZeroHedge does the same when appropriate. Sometimes you have to sift through rubbish to find diamonds.

Well in the case of this article i can safely say no diamonds found, Hamish/STS did a solid job of showing the sources as unreliable. So no smoke then.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

But I'm not.


Show me where I said there actually is a gag order such that I would have to even answer such a question.

If you want to find fault with Loomer's reporting, you're free to do so. But that in no way detracts from the fact that ZeroHedge reported Loomer's claims as Loomer's claims, which is factually accurate. The part that I'm interested in is the existence of a gag order and the cancelled interviews.



Actually it seems like you're already ignoring the content of my posts, so as you were.

There you go

 

[Xarog]

There you go

I'm interested in the existence = there is a question to be answered about the existence.

Try again.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

I'm interested in the existence = there is a question to be answered about the existence.

Try again.

Lol. I don't have to, it's clear for all to see...which is my real audience here.

The existence of something means it is a factual thing that exists. The theory that there is a gag order is a different thing.

You seem to have accepted it as a fact a long time ago, and as I pointed out....nothing in Looner's coverage actually show that...accept as a figment of her imagination at this stage, which you have swallowed hook line and sinker

 

[Xarog]

Lol. I don't have to, it's clear for all to see...which is my real audience here.

Then why didn't I say "The part that I'm interested in is the [-] existence of a [/-] gag order"?

The existence of something means it is a factual thing that exists. The theory that there is a gag order is a different thing.

Interest in the existence of a thing is distinct from interest in a thing. You seem to be struggling to make the distinction.

You seem to have accepted it as a fact a long time ago, and as I pointed out....nothing in Looner's coverage actually show that...accept as a figment of her imagination at this stage, which you have swallowed hook line and sinker

Your perception is mistaken, and you refuse to accept it even when it has been pointed out to you multiple times.

 

[buka001]

Well if you won't read their disclosure policy, then you can't really moan about what Zerohedge does or how it advises its readers to use its content because you are speaking from a position of ignorance.

So then why should I pay attention to what you say?

Edit: And the fact of the matter is that enough of Zerohedge's conspiracy theories turned out to be conspiracy fact such that it warrants paying attention to what sorts of wild theories they spin, anyway.

I really enjoy the cognitive dissonance you show with ZH.

You seem to display acceptance that what they post must be assessed with a measure of scepticism, then come back with an edit displaying a logical fallacy. The cognitive battle you have with this is fascinating.

You display a profound interest in psychology in many of your posts, so I am sure (despite your expected protestation to this post) at some level there is some appreciation of this phenomenon.