Musk Proposes to Buy Twitter for Original Price of $54.20 a Share

[Galactica]

 

[tetrasect]

 

[PsyWulf]

Nazis have feelings too

 

[greg0205]

OOF!

 

[PsyWulf]

OOF!

View attachment 1444831

You can take the guy out of South Africa...something something

 

[Galactica]

OOF!

View attachment 1444831

Is that really Elon engaging Kim or it's doctored tweets??

 

[quovadis]

Is that really Elon engaging Kim or it's doctored tweets??

Real. Theyre buddy buddy. More likely Elon was seeing who to fire next

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1604981780548767744

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1604985324505030658

 

[greg0205]

Is that really Elon engaging Kim or it's doctored tweets??

Nope, that's Kim.

Starts here:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1604810383646027776

 

[R13...]

Real. Theyre buddy buddy. More likely Elon was seeing who to fire next

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1604981780548767744

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1604985324505030658

Is Musk that in need of validation?

 

[greg0205]

Is Musk that in need of validation?

 

[quovadis]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1604892609096257536

 

[Kieppie]

OOF!

View attachment 1444831

Apartheid? Really? What an idiotic take, perfect for idiotic people.
Kinda par for the course considering the source of tweet & retweet though

 

[surface]

OOF!

View attachment 1444831

OTT about apartheid really but he seems to be shifting goalposts.

What next? Only allow blue subscribers that reflect his opinion?

 

[Kieppie]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1604892609096257536

Sorry but here's a pro tip for reading news/info online.
As soon as someone mentions "misogyny, racism, doxxing/harassment, courting extremists" in one sentence you know you should disregard anything the person says and move on.
You're welcome.

 

[greg0205]

Apartheid? Really? What an idiotic take, perfect for idiotic people.
Kinda par for the course considering the source of tweet & retweet though

 

[quovadis]

Sorry but here's a pro tip for reading news/info online.
As soon as someone mentions "misogyny, racism, doxxing/harassment, courting extremists" in one sentence you know you should disregard anything the person says and move on.
You're welcome.

Here's another pro tip. If you're a billionaire you can afford to ensure you're never in a situation where you get photographed with questionable people.

 

[Kieppie]

OTT about apartheid really but he seems to be shifting goalposts.

What next? Only allow blue subscribers that reflect his opinion?

Frankly nothing new. No company would allow non stakeholders to vote on their actual policies. There is no discrimination on the acquisition of membership. Membership can be viewed as lower level shareholders.

Polls to track user feedback is different though and would not need this requirement.

 

[Kieppie]

Hey look you pasted a picture having no relevance to the topic! Congrats!

 

[quovadis]

Frankly nothing new. No company would allow non stakeholders to vote on their actual policies. There is no discrimination on the acquisition of membership. Membership can be viewed as lower level shareholders.

Polls to track user feedback is different though and would not need this requirement.

Once again though that would be fine if Musk hadn't framed Twitter as the proverbial digital town square.

 

[Kieppie]

Here's another pro tip. If you're a billionaire you can afford to ensure you're never in a situation where you get photographed with questionable people.

Nah if you're invited you shouldn't need to decline because someone somewhere will take offence at other people in the vicinity. This guilt by association is childish.
Many other people also took photos with the various people there. The selective posting of photos is meritless.

So yes my previous statement about "news" containing all these buzzwords stands.