Musk Proposes to Buy Twitter for Original Price of $54.20 a Share

[Pegasus]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1602712709061087235

Is he a Russian asset?

 

[tetrasect]

Is he a Russian asset?

Clearly he is.

 

[Pegasus]

Clearly he is.

Evidence?

 

[Galactica]

'Crazy stalker' Elon Musk said was following 'assassination coordinates' was Uber Eats driver | Business Insider

Elon Musk blamed the incident on an account tracking his private jet but the LAPD has yet to establish a connection, The Washington Post reported.

www.businessinsider.co.za

 

[tetrasect]

Evidence?

I just posted it.

I'm not saying he's a Russian agent, but he's an asset to Russia. He is useful to them. He repeats their retarded propaganda and now he's banned Ukrainian phone numbers.

 

[Pegasus]

I just posted it.

I'm not saying he's a Russian agent, but he's an asset to Russia. He is useful to them. He repeats their retarded propaganda and now he's banned Ukrainian phone numbers.

Really that was it. That convinced you?

Ukrainian phone numbers can be used to log into Twitter again

Twitter has restored the logging in and account creation options to subscribers of Ukrainian mobile operators. This was reported by UNITED24.media – a media outlet covering the war in Ukraine and the Russian aggression for the whole world.

imi.org.ua

And

Why Ukraine Is Stuck With Elon (for Now)

His Starlink satellite internet service has largely kept Ukraine online—but highlights the risks of overreliance on the private sector in wartime.

foreignpolicy.com

Progressive fckwits.

lol

 

[Gyre]

I am just waiting for Blueanon blogs

 

[Pegasus]

I am just waiting for Blueanon blogs

Ask your bestie psychwoof for a copy

 

[capd]

I just posted it.

I'm not saying he's a Russian agent, but he's an asset to Russia. He is useful to them. He repeats their retarded propaganda and now he's banned Ukrainian phone numbers.

Bwahaha. Shame, slow times in the Ukie vs Russkie thread.

 

[tetrasect]

Really that was it. That convinced you?

You don't seem to know fkall about Elon's Tweet history regarding Ukraine and Russia.

Saying stuff like: "Crimea is part of Russia, as it has been since 1783 (until Khrushchev’s mistake)." is straight up nonsense Kremlin propaganda.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577006750800019457

 

[Pegasus]

Clearly he is.

He is

I just posted it.

I'm not saying he's a Russian agent, but he's an asset to Russia. He is useful to them. He repeats their retarded propaganda and now he's banned Ukrainian phone numbers.

He isn't

You don't seem to know fkall about Elon's Tweet history regarding Ukraine and Russia.

Saying stuff like: "Crimea is part of Russia, as it has been since 1783 (until Khrushchev’s mistake)." is straight up nonsense Kremlin propaganda.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577006750800019457

He is again


lol

 

[capd]

You don't seem to know fkall about Elon's Tweet history regarding Ukraine and Russia.

Saying stuff like: "Crimea is part of Russia, as it has been since 1783 (until Khrushchev’s mistake)." is straight up nonsense Kremlin propaganda.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577006750800019457

Why do you disagree with him?

 

[Pegasus]

Why do you disagree with him?

I am sure that having a poll to ask a question makes him a Russian asset.

He will tell you that Kissinger is also a Russian asset.

Loading…

m.jpost.com

 

[tetrasect]

Why do you disagree with him?

Because Crimea is part of Ukraine you twat.

 

[Kieppie]

So, I’ll take that as a no then. Guess you’re “stupid or spineless”. Point made.

Nope, you only took an extreme example where there is both an actual crime committed and universal condemnation and equating it to a scenario where some people disagree on politics with another government/figures and overhype the supposed implications.
Until people stop caring what some ignoramuses think then this will continue to be used as a cudgel. Guilt by association remains the playground of the intellectually stunted.
Once someone starts espousing the same views as that of the "problematic" party then you start having grounds for an argument

 

[greg0205]

Nope, you only took an extreme example where there is both an actual crime committed and universal condemnation and equating it to a scenario where some people disagree on politics with another government/figures and overhype the supposed implications.
Until people stop caring what some ignoramuses think then this will continue to be used as a cudgel. Guilt by association remains the playground of the intellectually stunted.
Once someone starts espousing the same views as that of the "problematic" party then you start having grounds for an argument

Um... Russia invaded Ukraine in Feb and there's been universal condemnation since, but you do you, Kieps.

 

[Kieppie]

Nope, thats your argument.

Twitter is more transparent than previously. Also freer with fewer arbitrary bans and more ban reversals. One would also expect less behind the scene communication with federal agencies.
Musks flipflopping notwithstanding these are all positive steps

 

[Kieppie]

Um... Russia invaded Ukraine in Feb and there's been universal condemnation since, but you do you, Kieps.

Your understanding of universal needs a bit of work, but how is that now relevant to the topic at hand or are you off on a irrelevant bender again?

edit : Ah now that I caught up with the last few posts I see it's pointless ree'ing about a Russian woman. Typical guilt by association again. As I mentioned in another post this is the playground of the intellectually stunted.

 

[Kieppie]

I just posted it.

I'm not saying he's a Russian agent, but he's an asset to Russia. He is useful to them. He repeats their retarded propaganda and now he's banned Ukrainian phone numbers.

So he didn't actually ban Ukraine numbers...

Strange I also see quite a few other countries not on that list.
Did Musk ban the United Arab Emirates as well? I thought he was bought and paid for by them?
Uzbekistan, The Vatican and Yemen amongst others are also missing. Did he ban them too?

 

[greg0205]

Your understanding of universal needs a bit of work, but how is that now relevant to the topic at hand or are you off on a irrelevant bender again?

Nah, just couldn't help notice how the list of things you're prepared debate, as long as you completely ignore or pretend parallels to comparable things don't exist, keeps growing.

Anyway...

TIL that invading a sovereign country can't be compared to a crime; UN condemnation can't be called universal; classifying twitter users as blue, legacy or regular can't be compared to classifying folks white, coloured, Asian, Indian or black; and only franchising paid blue twitter users isn't segregation, or, you know, 'apartheid' for the Afrikaans speaking folks.