-
Ask a question and get free supportUnlock new privileges and see hidden discussionsWin prizes and earn reputation
-
Question of the day ~ How often do you braai?
-
Afristay giveaway.Win a 2-night stay for two people at an establishment of your choice with R1,000 in spending money. Enter here.
Sign up with GoogleMusk Proposes to Buy Twitter for Original Price of $54.20 a Share
- Thread starter quovadis
- Start date
SlinkyMike
Executive Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2006
- Messages
- 9,578
Why do all you fscking weirdos speak in code like this?
Ecce! In pictura est puella nomine Cornelia. See how clever I sound reciting the first sentence from my latin text book from the first day of high school? No, your position is ridiculous and you seem unwilling to answer it because you cannot align your position with the argument itself. You're focusing on the scenario rather than the conflict itself.Reductio ad ridiculum. Best you stay away from all parties and meetings. You wouldn't want to be wrongly accused of 100% aligning with anyone in a photo with you
Kieppie
Executive Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2013
- Messages
- 9,230
What code? Should I use more imagined dog whistles and d!ck riding type comments that you lot understand instead?
Also sorry, but being called a weirdo by someone on the unhinged weirdo side of the spectrum doesn't really have the impact you believe it does. Just saying...
Kieppie
Executive Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2013
- Messages
- 9,230
Yeah how dare I try and change it up a bit.. I should just use the overused strawmanning term instead
No. I said that guilt by association is a horribly overused and dishonest practise. It's lazy and used by the same intellectually stunted people that employ baseless name calling with all the isms etc.
You failed to provide any actual reason why Musk going to the final, and all the corresponding brouhaha, was objectively bad.
You seem to support this notion of guilt by association and its continued use. Your asinine Epstein example only proves that all rules have exceptions. It however doesn't lend any credibility to the case at hand. It's quite similar to other debates on this forum where users are unable to argue the merits of their position, but pivot to almost insignificant exceptions to try and prove their point.
surface
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 26,594
imminent after hillary's arrest.
surface
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 26,594
imminent after wall is complete.
Gyre
Executive Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2011
- Messages
- 9,928
surface
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 26,594
what is happening ?
RedViking
Nord of the South
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2012
- Messages
- 58,139
Someone took a photo and now the world is falling apart. How you doing Surface?
It's really not that complicated. Elon is a public figure - what he does in public matters no matter how you much you wish to frame, excuse or minimise it.Yeah how dare I try and change it up a bit.. I should just use the overused strawmanning term instead
No. I said that guilt by association is a horribly overused and dishonest practise. It's lazy and used by the same intellectually stunted people that employ baseless name calling with all the isms etc.
You failed to provide any actual reason why Musk going to the final, and all the corresponding brouhaha, was objectively bad.
You seem to support this notion of guilt by association and its continued use. Your asinine Epstein example only proves that all rules have exceptions. It however doesn't lend any credibility to the case at hand. It's quite similar to other debates on this forum where users are unable to argue the merits of their position, but pivot to almost insignificant exceptions to try and prove their point.
tetrasect
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 9,097
Yeah just much more believable that Musk's security team would assault an "innocent man" out of the blue which happens to be obsessed with Musk.
Let's forget about the simplest and most plausible reason.
Talk about drinking the koolaid...
Don't worry once the news breaks that he wasn't a "victim" the story will just disappear from here and memory holed
And you believe that Musk's "real time location" was doxxed, which for some reason led a stalker to follow his son which was nowhere near Musk's "real time location"?
PsyWulf
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2006
- Messages
- 16,574
It's hilarious the level of mental gymnastics kieper has to go through to try "explain" Muskisms
Anybody with an IOTA of sense listened to Musk's "realtime doxxing" excuse and knew it was utter horseshite. Kieppie though? Please daddy Elon tell me more
tetrasect
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 9,097
Pegasus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Messages
- 13,973
Any photos of you with a right winger in the frame?
Not where I flew halfway across the world at their invitation.
ShaunSA
Derailment Squad
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
- Messages
- 49,728
tetrasect
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 9,097
Yeah, wearing a mask as an Uber driver is so crazy!
Yes, Elon's sons full name is X AE A-XII which is totally normal and proves without a doubt that Musk is completely sane and not at all crazy.
Gyre
Executive Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2011
- Messages
- 9,928
Reading more about the guy, he does sound like he is quite insane. Elon is definitely at fault for not going to the police and it's going to push the Stalker guy's paranoia even higher, but based on his comments he doesn't sound well.
Pegasus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Messages
- 13,973
I thought you were joking, because I figured you were a semi-sane leftist.
Guess I was wrong.