Karnaugh,
We have to lay them under the sea, otherwise Rob Mugabe would rob our cable.
Seriously though, the problem with laying the cables over land to reach Europe is the seemingly unending political intstability throughout Africa. Imagine international internet access being out every second day because the portion of the cable running through the DRC has been captured by rebels today, recaptured by the government and then nationalised by the government.
If each backwater banana republic between South Africa and Europe should nationalise their portion of such a cable system, we'll be paying about 10 times what we pay now to use SAT3/SAFE.
Remember, as African governments go, we are very fortunate. Most of these utterly insignificant little countries that carve up the continent are still playing the "colonialism" card and feel that everybody should feel sorry for them, and pay them huge amounts of money for anything they do for us, to "make up for past wrongs."
I would rather buy my international bandwidth from Telkom than from Robert Mugabe and Joseph Cabila. [

]
In my opinion, the best solution would be to go due East. Australia have long ago invested in proper infrastructure, which connects them to the world via the incredibly fast and underutilised telecommunications infrastructure in Japan.
One relatively inexpensive, very fast cable to Australia would probably solve most of our problems easily. The only problem, there's only one entity allowed to lay calbes from here to anywhere, so we'd still be buying our bandwidth from Telkom.
To get back to the hosting topic however, I wasn't really that conserned about international bandwidth. The problem that South African hosting companies face is getting their hands on any bandwidth at all.
Even those companies fortunate enough to be in the same building as JINX don't have it easy. 34mbps peering with JINX sells for R35 000 per month, last time I checked.
Willie Viljoen
Web Developer
Adaptive Web Development