N/A V6 to Supercharged V6...who?

viceroy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
356
I have a n/a V6 which makes decent power, but I'd like more, and have started thinking about boosting the power.

My first thought was turbo, but I don't like turbo lag, no matter how slight, and when I say that, the A4 1.8T lag, even though tiny annoyed me intensly.

So my next thought was supercharging, because the power is progressive so chances are the internals wouldn't need to be touched, and there is no lag

So who is JHB would be good to talk to about this?

Thanks
 

thedutchman

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
3,735
what car do you have ? you must always be careful messing around with your engine.
 

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,823
Alpine Developments

They use Eaton superchargers which is also the OE supplier for Ford, Pontiac, Toyota, Mercedes Benz, Nissan, Jaguar, Aston Martin and Buick.
 

Gaz{M}

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
7,490
Supercharging is very expensive. Why not fit a bigger engine instead?
 

Slootvreter

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
30,273
Superchargers do not affect the engine's durability, like a turbo does. It's just bloody expensive to fit!! :eek:
 

thedutchman

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
3,735
how expensive will it be, to fit a supercharger ? the site above states, that it will take up to 18 days or something to have the s/c fitted. I dont get it, why does it take so long ? for sure it cant be that difficult to fit it!?!?
 

Gnome

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
7,208
Last I checked fitting a Supercharger to a Corsa Lite Costs +-R35K whereas a Turbo costs R12K, just as comparison, it's incredibly expensive.

Engine also makes less power with a supercharger and low boost Turbo's have virtually no lag. For example 0.2 - 0.4 bar boost you won't feel lag if it's done properly. Since you have a V angle engine you can use a twin-turbo setup, I'd go for twin low boost for the N/A feel. It'll still be expensive but probably still less than a supercharger.
 

Gaz{M}

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
7,490
Also, because a V6 has more low down torque than a puny 4 cylinder, turbo lag will be much less noticeable. I still think simply buying a faster car will be more cost effective in the long run.
 

viceroy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
356
It's an Audi A3 3.2.

Right now I'm investigating options.

Fitting a bigger engine is not an option, as the VR6 engine in the A3 is about as big as you can get.

I like the idea of a supercharger because boost is constant, and there are no power surges like you get with a turbo.

I've also thought about getting a A3 2.0T, but I really like the quattro in mine...traction no matter what conditions.
 
Top