Ruth Hall's view on the bill. She served on the Presidential Advisory Board who advised on the bill,
she runs through the 5 points expressed in the bill where nil compensation can be paid, but the bill also very clearly express that the relevant circumstances aren't limited to those 5 points (12.3.a-e). Essentially, the bill states that there are 5 reasons, but that any other reason may also circumstantially apply. This should be scrutinised by the public and those who opposed the bill in my opinion.
As pro Hall is on this bill, well, she did advise on it, even she expressed in this interview that the state may look at property other than agricultural property and as a result that there will be many court cases in the time to come.
I do expect this bill to be signed into law somewhere in 2023. The question then is what the state will do with these powers?
In the case there will be ill-intended* expropriation, the state can argue it in the public interest, and will burden any opposition in the courts. This what I said here could spur capital to leave these shores.
*I see de Lille used nicer wording,
Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure Patricia de Lille said the government had no intention of using the Expropriation Bill to arbitrarily seize land from private owners.
www.citizen.co.za
Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure Patricia de Lille said the government had no intention of using the Expropriation Bill to arbitrarily seize land from private owners.