'Naughty' dog dragged behind car

[Slootvreter]

To everyone that has advocated support for the murder and/or torture of the person who was involved in dragging the dog behind the car :

You are guilty of precisely the same attitude which you find reprehensible in that man. He did something you find to be disagreeable (hurting the dog), just like the dog did something he didn't like (biting his kid).

So to all the would-be murderers and torturers, please do the rest of civilised humanity a favour and remove yourself from the human genepool. Thanks.

* yawn * Would-be murderers? WHAHAHA.

 

[xrapidx]

To everyone that has advocated support for the murder and/or torture of the person who was involved in dragging the dog behind the car :

You are guilty of precisely the same attitude which you find reprehensible in that man. He did something you find to be disagreeable (hurting the dog), just like the dog did something he didn't like (biting his kid).

So to all the would-be murderers and torturers, please do the rest of civilised humanity a favour and remove yourself from the human genepool. Thanks.

Really? So this person is also a defenseless, helpless animal?

Hope about we remove people like you, who condone this sort of behavior from the gene pool - people like you are the reason people like this get away with their crap.

I bet you also have a good reason as to why he did what he did, and why it wasn't his fault...blah blah blah...

 

[Xarog]

Really? So this person is also a defenseless, helpless animal?

Congratulations. By asking this question, your only objection is apparently the fact that the dog was helpless. I guess murder is ok now because murder victims aren't helpless.

Hope about we remove people like you, who condone this sort of behavior from the gene pool - people like you are the reason people like this get away with their crap.

I don't condone it. That's the point. You, however, do. You apparently seem to think it's ok to take your anger out on another living thing and to make it suffer because apparently it did something wrong in your eyes.

I bet you also have a good reason as to why he did what he did, and why it wasn't his fault...blah blah blah...

Nope. But if I had children, I doubt I'd act rationally if someone or something harmed them. But that's vastly different to casually talking about murder in a forum.

And it's vastly different to the hypocrisy the majority of you show because of your callous disregard to the routine suffering of animals just so that they can be meat on your plate. I've been to an abbatoir, and I can tell you it really isn't pretty.

 

[xrapidx]

Congratulations. By asking this question, your only objection is apparently the fact that the dog was helpless. I guess murder is ok now because murder victims aren't helpless.

A person has a lot better change of fighting off a murderer than a dog has of fighting off a moving car its been tied too...

I don't condone it. That's the point. You, however, do. You apparently seem to think it's ok to take your anger out on another living thing and to make it suffer because apparently it did something wrong in your eyes.

So - wasn't it wrong in your eyes? apparently not according to the above.

I believe in an eye for an eye - he should get what he dished out - he didn't do it by accident... thought that was obvious

Nope. But if I had children, I doubt I'd act rationally if someone or something harmed them. But that's vastly different to casually talking about murder in a forum.

And it's vastly different to the hypocrisy the majority of you show because of your callous disregard to the routine suffering of animals just so that they can be meat on your plate. I've been to an abbatoir, and I can tell you it really isn't pretty.

Really - do they drag cows/sheep/etc. behind cars over kilometers to kill them, and then not use the animal for consumption, etc.?

If you have an animal in your house, and it bites your kid, you are to blame... bet you wouldn't like me dragging your kid behind my car if he hits my kid on the school playground.... after all, I'm not going to act rationally.

 

[JHatman]

I hear dog doesn't taste too bad. At least the guy could cook it after they put it down, there is no law against eating a dog so yummy.

 

[Xarog]

A person has a lot better change of fighting off a murderer than a dog has of fighting off a moving car its been tied too...

So murder of human beings is more acceptable than killing an animal?

So - wasn't it wrong in your eyes? apparently not according to the above.

I explicitly stated that I do not condone it. Do you have trouble reading the words I write?

I believe in an eye for an eye - he should get what he dished out - he didn't do it by accident... thought that was obvious

Niether did the dog accidentally bite the child. And if you kill the man who injured the dog, then what's to stop me from killing you for killing the man who hurt the dog? And then what's to stop someone from killing me for killing you for killing the man for hurting the dog?

Really - do they drag cows/sheep/etc. behind cars over kilometers to kill them, and then not use the animal for consumption, etc.?

Here's the common way of slaughtering a chicken : The chicken is first subjected to several seconds of being shocked by electricity in order to stun the animal. The stunned animal is then hung upside-down while it's neck is sliced just deeply enough so that its heart pumps all its blood out onto the floor. I won't bother you with the details after the animal is dead, but I can assure you that you won't like hearing the noise the chicken makes while it is still alive.

If you have an animal in your house, and it bites your kid, you are to blame...

Animals can make choices too. That's why it's possible to train dogs/cats/horses etc.

 

[xrapidx]

So murder of human beings is more acceptable than killing an animal?

One's that treat other life like this - yes.

I explicitly stated that I do not condone it. Do you have trouble reading the words I write?

You also made contradicting statements, like its only wrong in my eyes, implying you see nothing wrong with it - maybe there is something wrong with the way you write.

Niether did the dog accidentally bite the child. And if you kill the man who injured the dog, then what's to stop me from killing you for killing the man who hurt the dog? And then what's to stop someone from killing me for killing you for killing the man for hurting the dog?

I'm starting to see where your mentality comes from

How do you know the dog didn't accidentally bite the child? The man didn't injure the dog, he dragged it behind a car - imagine what someone of this nature does when his kid breaks something.

I suppose it makes no difference to you whether he drags a kid behind his car, or his dog.

Here's the common way of slaughtering a chicken : The chicken is first subjected to several seconds of being shocked by electricity in order to stun the animal. The stunned animal is then hung upside-down while it's neck is sliced just deeply enough so that its heart pumps all its blood out onto the floor. I won't bother you with the details after the animal is dead, but I can assure you that you won't like hearing the noise the chicken makes while it is still alive.

Animals can make choices too. That's why it's possible to train dogs/cats/horses etc.

Does the above justify what this man has done? I suppose its also a good excuse for the guy with the chainsaw - he should have used it in court...

 

[noxibox]

How do you know the dog didn't accidentally bite the child? The man didn't injure the dog, he dragged it behind a car - imagine what someone of this nature does when his kid breaks something.

The most likely scenario is that both the child and dog were poorly trained. Animals need to be taught to tolerate the rough manner of children and children need to be taught the proper way to handle an animal.

This individual response indicates that he is prone to cruelty and/or extremely stupid. He can't possibly have believed the dog would survive unless he is exceptionally stupid. That means he intended to torture the dog to death. The authorities should consider removing his child as well as prosecuting him for the crime. Unfortunately penalties for animal cruelty are pathetic.

 

[xrapidx]

This individual response indicates that he is prone to cruelty and/or extremely stupid. He can't possibly have believed the dog would survive unless he is exceptionally stupid. That means he intended to torture the dog to death. The authorities should consider removing his child as well as prosecuting him for the crime. Unfortunately penalties for animal cruelty are pathetic.

+1 Well said

 

[Phenom]

The teacher apparently took revenge after the dog had bitten his five-year-old son on the nose and cheek.

So it's ok for the dog to do this to the child, but not ok for somebody to do this to the dog?

We care more about dogs than children?

Yes dogs are stupid, but they are still animals just like us, and if they aren't responsible, they should be punished for it.

Perhaps locking the dog up, SPCA or such for the same period as a human would have stood, would be a more appropriate punishment

(All speculative, i don't understand dog psychology.)

 

[Pooky]

So it's ok for the dog to do this to the child, but not ok for somebody to do this to the dog?

We care more about dogs than children?

Yes dogs are stupid, but they are still animals just like us, and if they aren't responsible, they should be punished for it.

The child most probably (unknowingly) provoked the dog.

If someone slapped you randomly in the face, I'm sure you wouldn't be too pleased.

The dog reacted the only way it knew how.
It is most definitely ok for the dog to do this, and it is of no fault of the dog.

 

[xrapidx]

So it's ok for the dog to do this to the child, but not ok for somebody to do this to the dog?

We care more about dogs than children?

Yes dogs are stupid, but they are still animals just like us, and if they aren't responsible, they should be punished for it.

Perhaps locking the dog up, SPCA or such for the same period as a human would have stood, would be a more appropriate punishment

(All speculative, i don't understand dog psychology.)

Seriously - you can't be this dumb?

Please show me where the dog dragged the kid from behind a car?

Or - if we were to reverse it the other why, the guy didn't bite the dog, did he? I missed that part in the article.

I can see how "dog bites kid", obviously not badly, as this was just the excuse the guy used, and not verified by anyone, please refer to the word "apparently" in the article... relates to "punish dog by dragging behind car, and then leave in bush to die".

 

[Phenom]

Yes, the dog did not do this to the child. I have said that my comment was all speculative, and I have suggested an alternative punishment.

About the 'apparently', yes, we don't know, but we have not addressed that we do, and everyone strangely ignored it.

how could you know how badly the child was bitten or not? And should this just be left? If a dog is conscious and can feel pain, I think, it should also respect that others can too.. ergo, my comment that I don't understand the dog psychology part.

 

[xrapidx]

Yes, the dog did not do this to the child. I have said that my comment was all speculative, and I have suggested an alternative punishment.

About the 'apparently', yes, we don't know, but we have not addressed that we do, and everyone strangely ignored it.

how could you know how badly the child was bitten or not? And should this just be left? If a dog is conscious and can feel pain, I think, it should also respect that others can too.. ergo, my comment that I don't understand the dog psychology part.

You would think someone would have then investigated the fathers claim and reported back if it was serious - I doubt the dog even bit the kid.

With regards to the dog knowing better - it probably does, otherwise it'd be running around bitting everyone, what is more likely, is that the father didn't teach the kid not to try irritate the dog - and the dog acted in self defense when it had a kid hanging from its tail.