Neotel "not be allowed to land the cable"

bekdik

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
12,860
Cable talks turn ‘sensitive'

http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/telecoms/2007/0708201100.asp?S=Broadband&A=BRO&O=ql


Cable talks turn ‘sensitive'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Paul Vecchiatto
Posted: 20 August 2007


All sides involved in the issue of granting landing rights to the Seacom East African undersea cable in SA bunkered down this morning as discussions between the parties continue.

Department of Communications, Neotel and Seacom representatives would not elaborate on last week's discussions concerning government's alleged opposition to a commercial undersea cable being landed in SA.

Late last week, a meeting took place between communications director-general Lyndall Shope-Mafole and Neotel representatives. The second national operator has entered into an alliance with Seacom, over the proposed landing of the cable in the country.

This deal will allow Neotel access to the international gateway, liberating local operators from being dependent on bandwidth access through Telkom's SAT-3 undersea cable.

However, industry sources say Shope-Mafole told Neotel it would not be allowed to land the cable because the country had not set guidelines for such an event. However, ITWeb could not ascertain details of exactly what was said.

Cut short

Shope-Mafole has made it clear she is not in favour of a commercial cable landing, as she feels it would not contribute to reducing the cost of broadband connectivity. Shope-Mafole stands firmly for the Nepad Broadband Infrastructure Network, which would consist of land and sea cables.

Earlier this year, Shope-Mafole severely curtailed SA's involvement in another commercial undersea cable, the East African Submarine Cable System (Eassy). She insisted national signal distributor Sentech withdraw from Eassy.

She later protested, in Parliament, against Telkom signing the Eassy supply contract – which is also a shareholder agreement among the participating telecommunications operators.

Telkom's signing of the Eassy contract, which allows it a stake of 11% in the consortium, was a major factor in the ejection of former Telkom CEO Papi Moletsane just before Easter.

Taking control

A communications department spokesman says it is planning to issue a press statement later today on the issue. A Neotel spokesperson would only say “talks are at a sensitive stage”.

Independent Communications Authority of SA councillor Tracy Cohen says the authority is drawing up regulations for essential facilities. However, these are not guidelines for the landing of an undersea cable, she notes.

“We are not drawing up any landing guidelines at the moment.”

Dene Smuts, Democratic Alliance communications spokesperson, says it appears the communications department wants to control the East Coast cables. The Department of Public Enterprises, through its newly formed Infraco, will control the West Coast cables, she adds.

“With the communications department having made a mess of things, it gives a person such as [public enterprises minister Alec] Erwin, an opportunity to come in with a reason to exert more control in the sector,” Smuts says.

One wonders what communications director-general Lyndall Shope-Mafole real agenda is.
 

stoke

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
10,532
You can land the cable when the landing company and the controlling company "look like me", until then ... objections will appear.
 

Abe

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2005
Messages
4,610
One wonders what communications director-general Lyndall Shope-Mafole real agenda is.

Neotel forgot to pay the kickbacks. The gov will happily put us back in the stone age just so that they can control everything. If they land a cable on the west coast, they can still bring down prices themselves. Another cable on the East coast is not going to miraculously increase prices.
 

Oupoot

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
269
I find it hard to understand her concern. In granting Neotel the SNO licence, the DOC gave them permission to carry international traffic - if they prefer to do that on infrastructure not controlled by govt or Telkom it should be their right. The only reasons I can think of is that she is busy establishing a govt entity that would suddenly "privatise" a few months after she quits govt and she can take a significant stake in it. Otherwise, she is afraid that the govt west coast cables will not be able to compete against private sector cables. They should clearly clarify their opposition to private sector cables based on clearly defined principles governing international connections. Though I am no expert in this field, it all looks haphazard as if there is no real plan / strategy.
 

Sneeky

Honorary Master
Joined
May 5, 2004
Messages
12,129
Shope-Mafole has made it clear she is not in favour of a commercial cable landing, as she feels it would not contribute to reducing the cost of broadband connectivity.
Oh, so the alternative is use SAT-3 which you refuse to pry out of TELKOM's grasp, or EASSY, which you have cocked before it started.

This woman has uttered some dumb/stupid/downright idiotic things during her tenure but this has to be the absolute dumbest one yet.

With people of this caliber involved in the decision making process, we really have no hope whatsoever.
 

antowan

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 1, 2003
Messages
13,054
Instead of doing her job and ensuring that we get access to as much info pipes as possible, this Queen of Sheba insists on playing the, "we don't have legislation for this" game. That is the ***kest excuse since God only knows what!
 

antowan

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 1, 2003
Messages
13,054
Unfortunately bribery tends to get more expensive the more corrupt the country gets. I think Neotel will find her price a bit steep perhaps...
 

quovadis

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
11,176
From ITWEB:
http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/telecoms/2007/0708201100.asp?A=BRO&S=Broadband&O=FPLEAD

... industry sources say Shope-Mafole told Neotel it would not be allowed to land the cable because the country had not set guidelines for such an event. However, ITWeb could not ascertain details of exactly what was said.

Shope-Mafole has made it clear she is not in favour of a commercial cable landing, as she feels it would not contribute to reducing the cost of broadband connectivity. Shope-Mafole stands firmly for the Nepad Broadband Infrastructure Network, which would consist of land and sea cables.

erm - you need 500GBit/s by 2010 - the more cables the better (private or public) in my opinion
 

Slooth

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
1,389
Isn't Shope-Mafole husband part of the NEPAD consortium? If so isn't that a conflict of interests?

I might be ahead of myself, but can something like that stand up in court?
 

Leitmotif

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
4,064
Graft and corruption...

Of course competing cables will make broadband cheaper! Fscksakes. Probably doesn't fall into their golden margin where government controls all access and claims healthy competition.
 

Leitmotif

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
4,064
'tch. Transparency is alive in the government, it seems... pure, transparent greed.
 

MFour

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2005
Messages
2,902
it's all about the money and protecting the interest of the back pocket, in my humble opinion.
 
Top