Neotel "not be allowed to land the cable"

[Johnny_Q]

Well, look at her education. Damn communist!!! The concept of capitalism and the market is not easily picked up by such people.

http://www.whoswhosa.co.za/Pages/profilefull.aspx?IndID=3510

Master of Science Jose Antonio Echeverria Higher Institute of Technology, Cuba

Cuba ! i wonder what they teach at that Institute

 

[bobby.quinne]

Master of Science Jose Antonio Echeverria Higher Institute of Technology, Cuba

Cuba ! i wonder what they teach at that Institute

Tabacco rolling!?!??

 

[bekdik]

The problem that the DOC faces is this: It cannot on the one hand allow Neotel to control the Seacom cable landing, and on the other hand disallow Telkom controlling the SAT-3 cable landing from November onwards.

If SAT-3 is to be declared an essentially facility to which all-comers will have cost-based access, it is difficult to sanction a repeat of what is about to be disallowed.

I'm pretty sure that the "sensitive discussions" are about ensuring cost-based access to the SEACOM cable, and ensuring that Neotel, if they land the cable, does not pull any Telkom-style profiteering out of the hat.

Trying to apply logic to a nonsense argument is a waste of time ...

 

[LabAnimal]

*sigh*!!! Honestly, the DOC has no clue! for **** sakes!