New SA traffic laws will be "too frightening to imagine" - Expert

Thor

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
44,240
ANC making their moves one funny law after the next.
 

Budza

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
8,621
You mean like when a traffic office pulls you over claiming you didn't stop at the stop sign when you actually did?
Should have let the guy write out his ticket then nail him later with the evidence.

Who has time for that though...

So, he gets to continue preying on the rest :(
 

Moto Guzzi

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2004
Messages
2,190
New SA traffic laws will be "too frightening to imagine" - Expert

If South Africa's new traffic laws are implemented next year, the injustices they will cause will be too frightening to imagine.

Precausery measures under known abnormal circuimstances:
If a country can be freezed in operation by a pandemic, like SARS-COV-2 with two narratives=Corona Virus & COVID-19,....
...Why Not....
If it is known to be corrupt, and on top of that those corrupt cases are expanding, huge and ongoing, my question is why cant new law writings be freezed as well, unless it has to do with clamping down on that type of a corruption,...as a precausery measure, so that if a new government comes in operation, they not have the task of tearing down multiple law systems, red tape etc, does the constitution protect the citizens under such circuimstances-?
 

Willie Trombone

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
60,038
That R100? It's little more than a way to recover lost revenue (those who don't) from those who do pay.
If I recall, in Gauteng alone, above 80% of offenders don't pay.
 

Zukat

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
1,426
That R100? It's little more than a way to recover lost revenue (those who don't) from those who do pay.
If I recall, in Gauteng alone, above 80% of offenders don't pay.

Exactly. The same people that continue paying their etolls and TV licenses- you guys are the real MVPs, I salute and thank you for your service.
 

Easter Bunny

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
1,868
how about they enforce the current traffic laws first, then create new ones? every day i in fourways i'm either avoiding people driving over red lights, or watching people ignore red lights. once had a taxi do a u-turn at a red robot while i was turning into the same road and i was hooting at him. the metro cop looked at him, then just pointed like "hey! i saw you! you better behave". that's it.

if anything, metro police will just use whatever new authoritarian rules to pull in more bribes.
 

Willie Trombone

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
60,038
how about they enforce the current traffic laws first, then create new ones? every day i in fourways i'm either avoiding people driving over red lights, or watching people ignore red lights. once had a taxi do a u-turn at a red robot while i was turning into the same road and i was hooting at him. the metro cop looked at him, then just pointed like "hey! i saw you! you better behave". that's it.

if anything, metro police will just use whatever new authoritarian rules to pull in more bribes.
They're not interested in enforcing anything, they're interested in money. The only way to do that is to chase the soft targets who pay. Make them pay more.
 

Moosedrool

Honorary Master
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
11,485
these draft regulations make it clear that money and not justice or road safety is the primary focus of the AARTO Act

No matter how many times I say this there's always some twat somewhere saying. "Just don't get fined."
 
Last edited:

Binary_Bark

Forging
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
38,582
It would be if they actually enforce them & start with the biggest problem we have on the roads, the taxi terrorists
 

Moosedrool

Honorary Master
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
11,485
Surely if people didn't break the rules of the road, then this amendment would be a mute point..? :unsure:


This means that even motorists who have been fined wrongfully will have to pay the new R100 infringement penalty levy.
 

Yskasmetnstoof

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2019
Messages
1,039
Looks like we will have to imagine these injustices, since the article has fukall information about it.

Use your head. It structurally puts a huge object between you and your right to fair legal treatment. Now ponder that and use your head a bit more.
 

bwbwings

Active Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
58
Surely if people didn't break the rules of the road, then this amendment would be a mute point..? :unsure:

Unfortunately not true, we got pull over because a cop did not see me stop at an intersection only when I stopped in the middle of an intersection because of a high speed car that did not look like he was going to stop. He pulled me over for rolling into the intersection and then stopping and gave me a fine. No matter how much I told him that I did stop he did not want to hear it.
Jokes on him through, I got him so pissed off that he inflated the fine to outside the limit of what is allowed that the fine got thrown out :ROFL::ROFL::ROFL:
 

The Magster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Messages
225
A surcharge? So I have to pay a penalty to receive my fine? If I don't pay the surcharge I don't get the fine? Just asking...:rolleyes:
 
Top