• You are losing out on amazing benefits because you are not a member. Join for free. Register now.
  • Big Two-Day Giveaway - Win an Amazon Kindle, a Mystery Gadget and Branded Gear. Enter Here.
  • Test your broadband speed and win prizes worth R5,000. Enter here.

New water restriction tariffs hit Cape Town: what you need to know

Zoomzoom

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
2,077
I haven't

They should make the taps like the one's in some public bathrooms where you have to push down on the top to let the water flow and as soon as you stop pushing the water stops.
c16fa8ea417d4cf1b9b2e3e93f9ac87d.jpg

000_DV7523781.jpg

The problem is not how much water the people can carry, but how much they leave on the ground.
 

calypso

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
1,005
That supplies 144Ml/day, which is nowhere close to half of CT consumption, even at level 4 restrictions. Nevermind normal consumption which was 1000Ml/day. I worked out that had a plant of this size been running 24/7 the moment dams were no longer overflowing at the end of 2014 we'd only have ±17% more water in the dams right now, so we'd still be at level 3 restrictions at least.
Its not meant to replace rain water, its to supplement.
 

theratman

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
7,161
View attachment 476024

View attachment 476028

The problem is not how much water the people can carry, but how much they leave on the ground.
Hire security guards to mission around making sure there's no wastage?

As to your point, yes it'll get broken very quickly. No matter what you do there will be a way to break it(intentionally) which then causes water to permanently run free.

Oh and I've never seen running taps, but I haven't ventured much into townships.
 

StrontiumDog

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
9,387
Dr David Olivier talking to John Maytham, going through the aforementioned 7 myths, 10 minute audio clip:
http://www.capetalk.co.za/articles/...cea-for-water-crisis-says-myth-busting-expert
Desalination plants aren't a panacea for water crisis, says myth-busting expert
8 November 2017 5:26 PM
 

noxibox

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
16,550
View attachment 476024

View attachment 476028

The problem is not how much water the people can carry, but how much they leave on the ground.
Firstly it doesn't change the truth of how much those communities use overall. Secondly your photographs only prove that spillage happens, which is inevitable, but does not prove your claim that taps are running continuously.
 

Gordon_R

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
3,887
Firstly it doesn't change the truth of how much those communities use overall. Secondly your photographs only prove that spillage happens, which is inevitable, but does not prove your claim that taps are running continuously.
I agree. One reason I keep posting these mythbusting articles, is that moral indignation at others wastage of water is not a rational basis for discussion or action!

The plan is to start with the biggest numbers, and focus efforts on getting the total usage down. Those who say "every drop counts" are misguided IMO...
 

saturnz

Honorary Master
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
11,492
The plan is to start with the biggest numbers, and focus efforts on getting the total usage down. Those who say "every drop counts" are misguided IMO...
simply deflection in order to avoid coming to terms with the fact that they themselves most likely waste more
 

C4Cat

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
6,556
I'm pretty sure one person with water in a house / flat - with flushable toilet, bath/shower, dishwasher and washing machine uses more water in a day than the spillage from those communal taps. In fact if you could measure all the tiny leakages from toilet cisterns into the bowl it would be way way more wastage than those communal taps.
 

ginggs

Super Grandwizard
Super Moderator
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
11,114
I'm pretty sure one person with water in a house / flat - with flushable toilet, bath/shower, dishwasher and washing machine uses more water in a day than the spillage from those communal taps. In fact if you could measure all the tiny leakages from toilet cisterns into the bowl it would be way way more wastage than those communal taps.
Assuming a flow rate of 12 litres per minute, an open tap will use 17kl per day, or 518kl in 30 days.
 
Last edited:

C4Cat

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
6,556
Assuming a flow rate of 12 litres per minute, an open tap will use 17kl per day, or 518kl in 30 days.
If it's actually left open all the time which I doubt and haven't seen any evidence of. I just saw photos of puddles, which is overflow from washing stuff and filling buckets. If they put a sink under the tap like you have under all your taps there would be no puddles. Maybe if one can't see the water that's being wasted one thinks it's less that it is...
 

Gordon_R

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
3,887
simply deflection in order to avoid coming to terms with the fact that they themselves most likely waste more
The opposite of moral indignation is virtue signalling. IMO the worst example of this is rainwater harvesting, which has now become a cult fashion. Boreholes come a close second, but involve more complex tradeoffs (which I will not discuss).

A typical setup (with plumbing) costs about R10K to store around 5kl of water. This is solely dependent on rainfall, which in Cape Town ranges from heavy falls in winter, to practically zero in summer (when it is most needed). The in-between months of Sep-Nov are the only ones that make any practical difference (about 20% of the annual average), roughly filling the tanks 4-6 times during this period.

Imagine if everyone in CT had this installed (hypothetically 1 million instances). The cost would be about R10bn, and the amount of water conserved would be around 20-30 billion liters during this 3 month period. This is equivalent to 40-60 days current consumption (500Ml/day) for the City of Cape Town, extending Day-Zero by a month or two, if this water could somehow be utilised (since it is non-potable).

Obviously infrastructure costs need to be spread over multiple years, but the sheer magnitude of the numbers involved, measured against the likely benefits, indicate that this is not a cost effective solution to the current crisis. If installing tanks gives you a warm glow, and you can wash your car, and keep some of the garden alive, then so be it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
3,811
Solution ?

Obviously infrastructure costs need to be spread over multiple years, but the sheer magnitude of the numbers involved, measured against the likely benefits, indicate that this is not a cost effective solution to the current crisis. If installing tanks gives you a warm glow, and you can wash your car, and keep some of the garden alive, then so be it.
What would you say is the solution then ?
Seeing as apparently Cape Town has historically lurched from one water crisis to the next
and
Has very few ( or no ) new options available.
Apart from waste water filtering / cleaning and re-use -- a la WINDHOEK
and
HOW much is all that going to cost ?
 

2012

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
8,143
Climate and rainfall variability is a very complex subject, but the interior summer rainfall and coastal winter rainfall regions undergo very different fluctuation patterns. The Western Cape is not geographically the same as South Africa, although it is also water stressed. False implication drawn by conflating the two in the quoted text!

Some light reading: http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2010JCLI3924.1
Shrugs

Now address the fact we don't have enough water in 10 years mostly due to population growth and dam sizes. Both your 8 year old "light reading" and the water intel report say "high degree of rainfall variability".

What exactly are you saying here? Ignore the report and not build more water sources for the people?
 

Gordon_R

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
3,887
What would you say is the solution then ?
Seeing as apparently Cape Town has historically lurched from one water crisis to the next
and
Has very few ( or no ) new options available.
Apart from waste water filtering / cleaning and re-use -- a la WINDHOEK
and
HOW much is all that going to cost ?
Shrugs

Now address the fact we don't have enough water in 10 years mostly due to population growth and dam sizes. Both your 8 year old "light reading" and the water intel report say "high degree of rainfall variability".

What exactly are you saying here? Ignore the report and not build more water sources for the people?
There is no magic solution, but the future will need several strategies, including the current water restricitons. The long term steps should be for the national government (DWA) to fund the augmentation proposals, as suggested by many reports and role-players over the past decade. My point above is that individual small-scale actions are not cost-effective, and will add little benefit in both the short and long-term.

This process will necessitate increases in the price of water, which has historically been simply the cost of reticulation, and not reflecting its scarcity value. The CoCT has already introduced stepped water tarrifs, with provision for low-income households. In years with a surplus, those who can afford to and wish to use extra water, should be able to do so with a clear conscience. The money that would have been spent on all those 5kl rainwater tanks, could IMO be much more productively used to fund water augmentation for the whole city.

The cost of supplying water to the second largest city in South Africa, however large, will be a fraction of the amount spent by Eskom in the last decade on yet-to-be completed power stations, and minuscule compared to the proposed nuclear build (R1 trillion). How would you rather taxpayers money be spent?
 
Last edited:

access

Executive Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
6,912
how do you lower consumption and increase prices?

create a crisis. exhibit a - Eskom

water? increase population development and stall water service development, wait for drought. blame the weather. profit.

these myth articles, i saw a similar "myth" article promoting the need for the nuclear deal, probably done by the same person. didn't bother checking.
 

HavocXphere

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
31,487
how do you lower consumption and increase prices?

create a crisis. exhibit a - Eskom

water? increase population development and stall water service development, wait for drought. blame the weather. profit.

these myth articles, i saw a similar "myth" article promoting the need for the nuclear deal, probably done by the same person. didn't bother checking.
Don't think this one was manufactured.
 

Zoomzoom

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
2,077
Firstly it doesn't change the truth of how much those communities use overall. Secondly your photographs only prove that spillage happens, which is inevitable, but does not prove your claim that taps are running continuously.
I've thought long and hard about what to reply.

1. NO-ONE in South Africa should be exempt from being educated on the importance of conserving and preserving our natural resources. From not throwing rubbish where-ever people like, to making sure that taps are not even left dripping.

2. Just because I point out that running taps waster precious water is not some kind of attack on the poor. It is pointing out a problem that usually gets a free ride because .. well just look at the responses to understand what the problem is. Poverty is not an excuse. I've been poor (homeless poor) and that was never an excuse nor a reason for leaving a mess or not saving - in fact it makes you hyper-aware of the cost of everything including water.

3. The amount of water on the ground is not from 'spillage' ground only gets that saturated in such a large area around a tap if the water is running for several hours at least. Try it yourself - go fill a bucket and let a bit slop on the ground - see not that wet. In fact it is even possible to fill the bucket without spilling! But if you are careless with it, don't position the bucket directly under the tap, making sure the water goes only in the bucket ... and leave the tap running while you get the cap on the first ... and so on ...

4. Take a drive through a township (it might be educational in more ways than one) and go look at the taps for yourself. Just because I can't find a photo online of a running tap, doesn't mean that it doesn't happen, or that I haven't seen it.
 

R13...

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
27,017
If the DWA are shirking responsibility why doesn't the city take them to court? Water is a basic right and it'd be a straight forward constitutional matter.
 
Top