New York Times backs only Democrats

Debbie

Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
7,253
From today's New York Times editorial:

NewYorkTimes said:
On Tuesday, when this page runs the list of people it has endorsed for election, we will include no Republican Congressional candidates for the first time in our memory. Although Times editorials tend to agree with Democrats on national policy, we have proudly and consistently endorsed a long line of moderate Republicans, particularly for the House. Our only political loyalty is to making the two-party system as vital and responsible as possible.
....
NewYorkTimes said:
This election is indeed about George W. Bush — and the Congressional majority’s insistence on protecting him from the consequences of his mistakes and misdeeds. Mr. Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 and proceeded to govern as if he had an enormous mandate. After he actually beat his opponent in 2004, he announced he now had real political capital and intended to spend it. We have seen the results. It is frightening to contemplate the new excesses he could concoct if he woke up next Wednesday and found that his party had maintained its hold on the House and Senate.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/opinion/05sun1.html

If anyone is wondering why there always seems to be important elections in the USA, it's because the American political system uses staggered terms of office. Every two years, a third of the Senate members and a third of the House members have their seats up for election. All members of Congress are appointed to terms of office of either 6 years (Senator), or 4 years (House of Reps Member). This means that America effectively has important national elections every two years.
 
Last edited:

kilo39

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
5,425
Thanks Debbie.

I hope the democrats kick their butts though I despair of a free election with the present scandals involving voter machines (which digg is full of.)

Bush essentially has power to do whatever he wants including locking up anybody he deems 'undesirable' and calling war on any he sees fit, including american citizens (without asking congress - to him he already has their permission.)

Read House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, DC. APRIL 6, 06 for a real eye opener.

Latest news: US Citizens to be Required ''Clearance'' to Leave USA

... and the endless list of scandals.

The bush government is out of control. My fervent wish is that GB would end up on the front line in Iraq but of course there is no hope of that.

Scumbags.
 

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,378
If anyone is wondering why there always seems to be important elections in the USA, it's because the American political system uses staggered terms of office. Every two years, a third of the Senate members and a third of the House members have their seats up for election. All members of Congress are appointed to terms of office of either 6 years (Senator), or 4 years (House of Reps Member). This means that America effectively has important national elections every two years.
Not a bad summary however its two yrs for a Congressman, not four, so the entire lower house faces re-election every two years.

You may have confused the four year term with that of the President?
 
Last edited:

Debbie

Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
7,253
From your link kilo:

HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES said:
Mr. Nadler: Well, does the law permit us to send someone to another country without any due process, without a hearing before an administrative, an immigration judge or somebody? Just grab them off the street and put them on a plane, goodbye without--we've done that. Does the law permit us to do that? Do we claim that right?
Attorney General Gonzales: I'm not going to confirm that we've done that----
Mr. Nadler: Well, wait a minute. That was confirmed in court. There's no question it was done.
.
 

Debbie

Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
7,253
Not a bad summary however its two yrs for a Congressman, not four, so the entire lower house faces re-election every two years.

You may have confused the four year term with that of the President?

My apologies Bwana, I thought House of Reps was 4 years.

So it's just the terms of the Senators which are staggered then, leading to a third of the Senator seats being up for re-election every two years, correct?
 
Last edited:

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,378
My apologies Bwana, I thought House of Reps was 4 years.

So it's just the terms of the Senators which are staggared then, leading to a third of the Senator seats being up for re-election every two years, correct?
Thats right :) Its also staggered in such a way the both Senatorial seats are never up for re-election at the same time.
 

Debbie

Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
7,253
Ok, I see how that's good for continuity purposes.

Question: Do they work it so that State elections also happen in conjunction with national elections? Not only for local State legislature, but also for Governor? i.e. Are there any States currently also electing Governors?
 

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,378
Ok, I see how that's good for continuity purposes.

Question: Do they work it so that State elections also happen in conjunction with national elections? Not only for local State legislature, but also for Governor? i.e. Are there any States currently also electing Governors?
Yes - afaik they all have their general election on the same day* - which is Nov 7 this year. The date, for federal at least, is always the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

For a list of who's running for what and where have look here - http://www.nytimes.com/ref/washington/2006ELECTIONGUIDE.html

*EDIT - I was close :)
 
Last edited:

Debbie

Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
7,253
Great map they have there - does all the mental legwork for you!

Wow, ok, so plenty of Governors also up for defeat/re-election then.

I'll be watching the elections on CNN etc through the night I expect. The American system is not perfect - no system is - but they seem to be the most successful at this 'democracy' thing, so I figure we South Africans could maybe learn a thing or two

Unfortunately, I will be without internet access :/ <damn damn damn damn! :(>
 
Top