No bail for Mpumalanga farmers charged with murder, violating a corpse

How long does it usually take to have that bail hearing?

How can they not know pretty much the same day whether or not that brain is human?

Finding out whether or not something is human is a very quick test. Don't even need complex machinery. Simple antibody test.
Doubt they care about the brain. Someone I know was in jail for 3 months before they said he can go as everything turned out to be hogwash.

So the answer is, as long as they want.
 
Doubt they care about the brain. Someone I know was in jail for 3 months before they said he can go as everything turned out to be hogwash.

So the answer is, as long as they want.
I would have assumed someone wandering about with a human brain would be the reason you get no bail.

If that brain's human those people are definitely dangerous. What kind of lunatic removes a person's brain...
 
I would have assumed someone wandering about with a human brain would be the reason you get no bail.

If that brain's human those people are definitely dangerous. What kind of lunatic removes a person's brain...
Maybe just part of brain's. Probably shot in the head. Have you not watched zombie movies?

test on the ‘partial’ brain to determine if it was human was inconclusive.
 
Let me get this story straight.

5 armed black men broke in / onto a farmer's property in the dark.
They attacked the farmers and 3 ran away when 2 were wounded / killed.

Sounds an awful lot like an attempted farm murder gone wrong for the attackers.

Now it's the farmers who were attacked that are facing charges for shooting at armed burglars / murderers.

Tell us more about what you think happened
 
Maybe just part of brain's. Probably shot in the head. Have you not watched zombie movies?

You don't need a whole brain, a tiny piece will do. Remember they can extract dna from a hair folicle as well as thousand year old bones and teeth.
 
You don't need a whole brain, a tiny piece will do. Remember they can extract dna from a hair folicle as well as thousand year old bones and teeth.
Yeah but @porchrat think these guys removed the brains and keeping it in a jar somewhere .

Also, you give way to much credit to these investigators. They can be extremely incompetent. Most of the time the evidence goes missing or ends up in someone's KFC.
 
Maybe just part of brain's. Probably shot in the head. Have you not watched zombie movies?
True. In my mind it's literally a maniac walking around with a brain, not some sliver of brain matter, the article says partial. You're likely right here.
 
Yes, but had the farmers shot back and killed a few, fair enough.

But the two bodies disappeared and then there was a brain in a bag, or something.

Usually when you shoot an I truder you call the cops.
Or at the minimum you don't keep the brain.
 
Let me get this story straight.

5 armed black men broke in / onto a farmer's property in the dark.
They attacked the farmers and 3 ran away when 2 were wounded / killed.

Sounds an awful lot like an attempted farm murder gone wrong for the attackers.

Now it's the farmers who were attacked that are facing charges for shooting at armed burglars / murderers.
This whole case stinks to high heaven and I tend to agree with this sentiment.

1. One does not "go hunting" unarmed, so in all likelihood it was an attempted farm invasion gone wrong;
2. The brain that was found could just as well have been from a sheep or pig for consumption by the farmer or his workers, but no IT HAS TO BE FROM A CORPSE;
3. The charges are also suspect as there appears to be no physical evidence of a corpse, mutilated or otherwise, so where does the "violating a corpse" charge spring from? Based purely on the presence of a partial brain that couldn't even be confirmed to be human?

Nah, I don't believe the narrative for a second. Besides, the article too one-sided for my liking.
 
This whole case stinks to high heaven and I tend to agree with this sentiment.

1. One does not "go hunting" unarmed, so in all likelihood it was an attempted farm invasion gone wrong;
2. The brain that was found could just as well have been from a sheep or pig for consumption by the farmer or his workers, but no IT HAS TO BE FROM A CORPSE;
3. The charges are also suspect as there appears to be no physical evidence of a corpse, mutilated or otherwise, so where does the "violating a corpse" charge spring from? Based purely on the presence of a partial brain that couldn't even be confirmed to be human?

Nah, I don't believe the narrative for a second. Besides, the article too one-sided for my liking.


There is a screw loose somewhere up with you two... @Conack
 
Afrikaners... Boer... They did create the Booremag, NGKerk, Apartheid etc and the state we are in now, so its expected and will continue forevermore when they carry on like this. they will forever have a stigma.
Best is Afrikaans gets abolished. 100 years it will be history and nobody can be blamed. Afrikaners caused a lot of issues in my life too, so they will not be missed.

Ek neem aanstoot met jou veralgemening.

State YOUR race / creed / tribe, so we can see whether ‘your’ hands are clean
 
Back
Top