Yea... goodbye 200mb+ updates daily; goodbye unsupported everything; goodbye endless hunt for drivers; goodbye exhaustive list of desktop mnagers nd all of their disparate and overlapping themes etc; goodbye trawling forums to get a soundcard to work (even Windows manages that right out of the box.)
Linux on the desktop is a fun hobby but once the spinning cubeneymoon wears off the warts start to show.
I had a good long and hard ponder whether I should retort or just leave it be. Linux is not perfect, neither is any other OS and to make such a claim is asking for trouble. You rant on a version of Ubuntu that is how old?
Let me just counter retort with something similar to show you how stupid this sounds:
Windows Fat32 cannot format my 1TB hdd, Windows ME gave me endless headaches and is as stable as a fart in a paper bag, Windows 95 was a pain to get networking going as well as Windows 98, over 1Gb of updates on a standard XP install (Standard-> Sp1-> SP2 -> SP3)!!! Every time I installed an updated Windows (98-> ME-> XP-> Vista) I basically had to go out and buy a whole new computer to handle the software, etc.
200mb plus updates daily, if you want to convert your displeasure at something at least tell the truth, don't lie, 200mbx30x2years (the age of Gutsy) = ?
If you told the truth it would have been +/- 600mb updates immediately within the first few days of installation and thereafter RARELY EVER and update over 50mb, most updates well under 10mb even.
Notice not one Windows 7 comment? Notice not one Karmic/2009 distro comment in your reply? Holding something against a two year old OS is stupid without taking a look at what they changed and how.
You see, there I went and got on my soap box again, but hey, you do not like Linux, then leave it be, you love Windows, then take your credit card (because you are legit in using ALL your software right) and support them. Whatever makes you happy.
