Non-Vaccination brag thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

HermeticAnarchist

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
319
Both statements have always been true. It has always been a requirement to use the intellect you have been blessed with to its maximum potential.

Agreed. But people barely use theirs any more. They have become lazy, relying on other people to do things like research for them.

You want to "debunk" something? Sure, just go to a "fact-checker" site. I guarantee they have "answers" just waiting for you and you barely have to be conscious to accomplish it. Then off you go, proudly proclaiming that you "did your research" when in actual fact you got sold a dummy.
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
25,833
Agreed. But people barely use theirs any more. They have become lazy, relying on other people to do things like research for them.

You want to "debunk" something? Sure, just go to a "fact-checker" site. I guarantee they have "answers" just waiting for you and you barely have to be conscious to accomplish it. Then off you go, proudly proclaiming that you "did your research" when in actual fact you got sold a dummy.
I'll give you this... You've turned sophistry into high-art.
 

Spizz

Goat Botherer
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
28,019
Agreed. But people barely use theirs any more. They have become lazy, relying on other people to do things like research for them.

You want to "debunk" something? Sure, just go to a "fact-checker" site. I guarantee they have "answers" just waiting for you and you barely have to be conscious to accomplish it. Then off you go, proudly proclaiming that you "did your research" when in actual fact you got sold a dummy.

Interesting. So what resources do you use to get the real news? And how do you know your resources are authentic?
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
25,833
Again, not sure why you'd bring about increasing your chances of hospitalisation and death? The data is crystal clear.

You see this from the Post, Chris?


FBw4X-UXIAE3i95
 

HermeticAnarchist

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
319
Interesting. So what resources do you use to get the real news? And how do you know your resources are authentic?

You can start by using a search engine that doesn't present results according to who pays them the most. Your search engine should be as impartial as possible.

From there it's detective work. Follow threads of information and suspend judgement until you've viewed multiple sources and different viewpoints. Check things like site funding and affiliations - these can be quite revealing.

Never take anything at face value. Always look deeper. Learn to recognize and trust your intuition.

Above all learn how your mind works. Without this, you will never be able to protect it effectively. With it, you cannot be fooled easily.
 

TofuMofu

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
10,585
You can start by using a search engine that doesn't present results according to who pays them the most. Your search engine should be as impartial as possible.

From there it's detective work. Follow threads of information and suspend judgement until you've viewed multiple sources and different viewpoints. Check things like site funding and affiliations - these can be quite revealing.

Never take anything at face value. Always look deeper. Learn to recognize and trust your intuition.

Above all learn how your mind works. Without this, you will never be able to protect it effectively. With it, you cannot be fooled easily.
1634332751152.png

Or on heavy drugs...because yoh...
 

Nanfeishen

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,779
Preferably not. Qualifications only make you believe that you know it all already and you reject anything that goes against your preconceived ideas on the matter. Sooner or later everyone will realise that they need to unlearn everything they have been taught and start all over again.
The whole "qualifications" argument is nothing more than a cheap parlour trick to silence critics.

This notion that if one doesnt have some form of credentials or a string of fancy letters behind their name, is meant to and designed to diminish input from anybody that actually has the gall to reason and question the norm or the narrative.

Its a handy technique used for making people feel they dont know anything, and its best they dont question, but rather leave the running of things and the decision making to those who are are deemed intellectually superior to them due to some or other qualification.

Its elitist cr@p , a holdover from school programming where questioning the teacher or the methodology or the curriculum or the subject matter is rewarded with punishment in some form or manner, because to question means you doubt your "superiors" or "your elders" or "those more knowledable than yourself".

It is nothing more than a conformist mentality trick designed to marginalize independant minded , or non conformist thinkers in such a way as to relegate them to the fringes of society or issues.
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
25,833
You can start by using a search engine that doesn't present results according to who pays them the most. Your search engine should be as impartial as possible.

From there it's detective work. Follow threads of information and suspend judgement until you've viewed multiple sources and different viewpoints. Check things like site funding and affiliations - these can be quite revealing.

Never take anything at face value. Always look deeper. Learn to recognize and trust your intuition.

Above all learn how your mind works. Without this, you will never be able to protect it effectively. With it, you cannot be fooled easily.
So, basically TikTok and 8kun, except for, you know, the kiddie porn.

Also...

Who, exactly, are these unscrupulous funders and affiliations that alarm you so?
 

semaphore

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
13,439
The whole "qualifications" argument is nothing more than a cheap parlour trick to silence critics.

This notion that if one doesnt have some form of credentials or a string of fancy letters behind their name, is meant to and designed to diminish input from anybody that actually has the gall to reason and question the norm or the narrative.

Its a handy technique used for making people feel they dont know anything, and its best they dont question, but rather leave the running of things and the decision making to those who are are deemed intellectually superior to them due to some or other qualification.

Its elitist cr@p , a holdover from school programming where questioning the teacher or the methodology or the curriculum or the subject matter is rewarded with punishment in some form or manner, because to question means you doubt your "superiors" or "your elders" or "those more knowledable than yourself".

It is nothing more than a conformist mentality trick designed to marginalize independant minded , or non conformist thinkers in such a way as to relegate them to the fringes of society or issues.
Fancy diatribe, but I wonder if you’d put your money where your mouth is and only let a qualified person operate on you or a loved one, because after all, it’s just letters behind a name holding back their free thinking.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top