Non-Vaccination brag thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aasvoël

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
738
Really why? The outbreak was recognized 10 days ago.

"The team at Carnival noted that all positive cases have been isolated and contact tracing has ended with no additional positive cases found"

The cruise time from what I could find is anywhere from 6 -8 days, that 10 day figure is when it was identified. It's almost like a virus with exponential growth would infect more people the longer they are exposed to it, like say a cruise and then further quarantine after that.
 

Daveogg

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
2,311
The cruise time from what I could find is anywhere from 6 -8 days, that 10 day figure is when it was identified. It's almost like a virus with exponential growth would infect more people the longer they are exposed to it, like say a cruise and then further quarantine after that.
Point being 26/27 were crew, they don't get off at the end of the cruise. guess time will tell.
 

Aasvoël

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
738
I see, so the "hygiene protocols", that we have subsequently learnt are that effective? Strange how having learnt all these effective measures we are now into our 3rd wave? Maybe they only work on a ship where everybody has been ............................?
As some one in the medical field you must surely understand that even basic sanitation is better than no sanitation? Go read up on the 'Covid Mill'. We can also be sure that lesson were learned from that cruise that is now being applied to this instance.

The lack of serious cases and death is great news though. Although most that died on the first ship 70+ and of the of the 696 that were confirmed while onboard 410 were asymptomatic

Edit: The ship had a calculated R0 of 14.8 :O
 

Daveogg

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
2,311
As some one in the medical field you must surely understand that even basic sanitation is better than no sanitation? Go read up on the 'Covid Mill'. We can also be sure that lesson were learned from that cruise that is now being applied to this instance.

The lack of serious cases and death is great news though. Although most that died on the first ship 70+ and of the of the 696 that were confirmed while onboard 410 were asymptomatic

Edit: The ship had a calculated R0 of 14.8 :O
So in the medical field and have worked on the cruise ships ( Sun Princess ), and have a friend and colleague who was Snr Doc on Ruby Princess when they had their outbreak and was screwed over by the Aussie authorities - so have quite an intimate knowledge of the scenarios.

Cruise ships are notorious for viral epidemics - norovirus and influenza. And therefore had policies and practices already in place a long time prior to Covid, so I can assure you there was a lot more than "basic sanitation" going on on the Diamond princess.

No sure where that R0 came from but a R0 of 14 would have burnt through everyone on that ship very quickly.
I have found this which sounds more reasonable?

"The Maximum-Likelihood (ML) value of R0 was 2.28 for COVID-19 outbreak at the early stage on the ship. The median with 95% confidence interval (CI) of R0 values was 2.28 (2.06-2.52) estimated by the bootstrap resampling method. The probable number of new cases for the next ten days would gradually increase, and the estimated cumulative cases would reach 1514 (1384-1656) at the tenth day in the future. However, if R0 value was reduced by 25% and 50%, the estimated total number of cumulative cases would be reduced to 1081 (981-1177) and 758 (697-817), respectively."


The image of the epidemic curve gives credence to your suggestion that perhaps we need to wait another week until comparing the outbreaks.

EDIT: Just to add whenever we talk about asymptomatic infection, just a caveat - it usually refers to asymptomatic at the time of testing, often in these type scenarios they are really presymptomatic.
 

Attachments

  • F1.large (2).jpg
    F1.large (2).jpg
    68.7 KB · Views: 16

Aasvoël

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
738
So in the medical field and have worked on the cruise ships ( Sun Princess ), and have a friend and colleague who was Snr Doc on Ruby Princess when they had their outbreak and was screwed over by the Aussie authorities - so have quite an intimate knowledge of the scenarios.

Cruise ships are notorious for viral epidemics - norovirus and influenza. And therefore had policies and practices already in place a long time prior to Covid, so I can assure you there was a lot more than "basic sanitation" going on on the Diamond princess.

No sure where that R0 came from but a R0 of 14 would have burnt through everyone on that ship very quickly.
I have found this which sounds more reasonable?

"The Maximum-Likelihood (ML) value of R0 was 2.28 for COVID-19 outbreak at the early stage on the ship. The median with 95% confidence interval (CI) of R0 values was 2.28 (2.06-2.52) estimated by the bootstrap resampling method. The probable number of new cases for the next ten days would gradually increase, and the estimated cumulative cases would reach 1514 (1384-1656) at the tenth day in the future. However, if R0 value was reduced by 25% and 50%, the estimated total number of cumulative cases would be reduced to 1081 (981-1177) and 758 (697-817), respectively."


The image of the epidemic curve gives credence to your suggestion that perhaps we need to wait another week until comparing the outbreaks.

EDIT: Just to add whenever we talk about asymptomatic infection, just a caveat - it usually refers to asymptomatic at the time of testing, often in these type scenarios they are really presymptomatic.

The R0 of 14 was not the actual rate, you are correct. The R0 of 14 figure was modeled from the initial infections. R0 was subsequently reduced, helped by isolation and quarantine.

The basic reproduction rate was initially 4 times higher on-board compared to the
equation M1
in the epicentre in Wuhan, but the countermeasures lowered it substantially. Based on the modeled initial
equation M2
of 14.8, we estimated that without any interventions within the time period of 21 January to 19 February, 2920 out of the 3700 (79%) would have been infected. Isolation and quarantine therefore prevented 2307 cases, and lowered the
equation M3
to 1.78. We showed that an early evacuation of all passengers on 3 February would have been associated with 76 infected persons in their incubation time.

So really should have gotten everyone of the ship earlier. They sailed around with covid for something like 11 days unknowingly spreading covid from initially only 1 positive person :O
 
Last edited:

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,104
Not sure if this has been posted on one of the other threads - been trying to keep tabs on them all but one needs 2hrs a day to stay up to date these days.


Also see for interest, Covid cases spiking in Israel:


So 95% of hospital patients are vaccinated, 5% are unvaccinated.

Out of 72 patients hostpitalized, 2 died. That's 2.77%.

So who's to say the 2.77% who died weren't part of the 5% who were unvaccinated?

Anyways, these numbers are almost insignificant. Just end the lockdown. If you don't have 70 hospital beds then you have bigger problems.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
35,134
So in the medical field and have worked on the cruise ships ( Sun Princess ), and have a friend and colleague who was Snr Doc on Ruby Princess when they had their outbreak and was screwed over by the Aussie authorities - so have quite an intimate knowledge of the scenarios.

Cruise ships are notorious for viral epidemics - norovirus and influenza. And therefore had policies and practices already in place a long time prior to Covid, so I can assure you there was a lot more than "basic sanitation" going on on the Diamond princess.

No sure where that R0 came from but a R0 of 14 would have burnt through everyone on that ship very quickly.
I have found this which sounds more reasonable?

"The Maximum-Likelihood (ML) value of R0 was 2.28 for COVID-19 outbreak at the early stage on the ship. The median with 95% confidence interval (CI) of R0 values was 2.28 (2.06-2.52) estimated by the bootstrap resampling method. The probable number of new cases for the next ten days would gradually increase, and the estimated cumulative cases would reach 1514 (1384-1656) at the tenth day in the future. However, if R0 value was reduced by 25% and 50%, the estimated total number of cumulative cases would be reduced to 1081 (981-1177) and 758 (697-817), respectively."


The image of the epidemic curve gives credence to your suggestion that perhaps we need to wait another week until comparing the outbreaks.

EDIT: Just to add whenever we talk about asymptomatic infection, just a caveat - it usually refers to asymptomatic at the time of testing, often in these type scenarios they are really presymptomatic.

Thankfully we have a qualified and experienced voice of reason here.
 

Kosmik

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
25,659
Interesting that threads bemoaning vaccines, get discussed a wee bit and are then totally deleted?

If we are going to debate folks, leave it for all to see.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Messages
1,320
Interesting that threads bemoaning vaccines, get discussed a wee bit and are then totally deleted?

If we are going to debate folks, leave it for all to see.
Discussing anything negative about the vaccines has been forbidden by the establishment, so that's off limits in almost all places on the internet. Even without censorship, a mob of vaccine police will be ready to pounce and attempt to discredit anything which could even be perceived as not aligned with the narrative. Any attempt at discussion will be shutdown before anyone can debate anything.

Mind explaining what part of the video upsets you?
The part where he regrets getting all his vaccines, and warns everyone who isn't vaccinated to stand their ground and not get it, because he now has severe issues that he never had before taking the vaccines and his body can barely function.
 

Kosmik

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
25,659
Discussing anything negative about the vaccines has been forbidden by the establishment, so that's off limits in almost all places on the internet. Even without censorship, a mob of vaccine police will be ready to pounce and attempt to discredit anything which could even be perceived as not aligned with the narrative. Any attempt at discussion will be shutdown before anyone can debate anything.
Nonsense, look at the opinions on this thread. But deleting discussions is unnecesary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top