Non-Vaccination brag thread

[tetrasect]

Yeah, no. Wrong think isn't banable. Spewing "garbage" is allowed.

Yeah he wasn't banned for what he was thinking, he was banned for what he was typing. And he was typing walls of Covid misinformation which is not just bannable but punishable by law.

 

[Emjay]

Yeah he wasn't banned for what he was thinking, he was banned for what he was typing. And he was typing walls of Covid misinformation which is not just bannable but punishable by law.

If "misinformation" was a bannable offense, there would be barely a user base left.

 

[tetrasect]

If "misinformation" was a bannable offense, there would be barely a user base left.

Nobody else here was claiming that 5100 patents since 1999 were filed for the express purpose of controlling the mutation of Covid, which was manufactured to control us, and that there are actually no variants and the pandemic is staged and this kind of kak.

 

[Emjay]

Nobody else here was claiming that 5100 patents since 1999 were filed for the express purpose of controlling the mutation of Covid, which was manufactured to control us, and that there are actually no variants and the pandemic is staged and this kind of kak.

Link?

 

[tetrasect]

Link?

Can't remember which thread it was but he was pushing this document the other day, calling it "legally binding" proof.

https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf

 

[semaphore]

Can't remember which thread it was but he was pushing this document the other day, calling it "legally binding" proof.

https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf

Ivermectin thread.

 

[Emjay]

Can't remember which thread it was but he was pushing this document the other day, calling it "legally binding" proof.

https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf

So you think he should be banned for posting this?

 

[semaphore]

So you think he should be banned for posting this?

lt was obviously more than just that, he was spreading a lot of misinformation, constantly spamming threads with his mass media YouTube evidence.

 

[Emjay]

lt was obviously more than just that, he was spreading a lot of misinformation, constantly spamming threads with his mass media YouTube evidence.

I see many others posting mass media YouTube evidence. Does the forum now have rules on evidentiary gathering?

Edit:

If he broke the rules, fine. But I somehow think there is more to this than meets the eye.

I also find the whining about him interesting when there seems to be a very robust conversation about Ivermectin happening with a lof of debunking happening. So, where is the problem?

I am also convinced most people noped out of that conversation already except for the few who post there.

 

[tetrasect]

So you think he should be banned for posting this?

Like @semaphore said, it was a constant stream of BS and then going on about how everyone except him is brainwashed and blah blah blah.

And I'm guessing tons of people put him on ignore which probably made the decision to ban him much easier.

Whether he got banned for breaking the law, the forum rules, or just for being a major irritation to other members, I welcome their decision.

 

[rietrot]

lt was obviously more than just that, he was spreading a lot of misinformation, constantly spamming threads with his mass media YouTube evidence.

Either something is wrong or not. The claim was spreading misinformation should be bannable and it also illegal.
This is objective.

Now you are bringing your feelings into it and saying if someone spread too much misinformation it is wrong.
This makes it way more subjective, because what is the correct amount of misinformation?

That guy was likely banned for spamming. He got annoyed with the trolls and posted the same YouTube video over and over again. The information was irrelevant.

If i remember correctly. I saw something like that happening, but thought it was stupid so didn't pay to much attention or get involved.

 

[Emjay]

Like @semaphore said, it was a constant stream of BS and then going on about how everyone except him is brainwashed and blah blah blah.

And I'm guessing tons of people put him on ignore which probably made the decision to ban him much easier.

Whether he got banned for breaking the law, the forum rules, or just for being a major irritation to other members, I welcome their decision.

Then why didn't you just ignore him?

 

[tetrasect]

Then why didn't you just ignore him?

I've never put anyone on ignore.

 

[Emjay]

I've never put anyone on ignore.

But you will then whine about their posts?

 

[tetrasect]

But you will then whine about their posts?

I just explained why I think he got banned.

You're the one whining about the fact that he got banned.

 

[Emjay]

I just explained why I think he got banned.

You're the one whining about the fact that he got banned.

Fair enough.

 

[Dave]

It was not Xarog's account.

It was.

But well done on getting the account banned.

I didn’t report it, and have no idea who did.

 

[Emjay]

It was.



I didn’t report it, and have no idea who did.

It was not. Unless you have some insights we do not?

Someone else identified the account correctly though.

It is funny how you and your friends see Xarog everywhere though. Rent free. It's would be pretty funny if it were not so sad.

 

[Gyre]

It was not Xarog's account.

Maybe try again. But well done on getting the account banned.

Do you know who it was perhaps? Not to violate anyone's privacy but it gets hard to tell who is who any more.

 

[argh]

Very good, very up to date article, on what the vaccines can and cannot achieve, written by a large group of South Africa's doctors, professors, and research scientists: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/art...d-immunity-what-might-happen-in-south-africa/