konfab
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Messages
- 36,120
I never stated I backed the law you cited. I stated I disagreed with the analysis of the law that was provided that claimed the law allows for someone to kill a pregnant woman who wanted to get an abortion. The "if necessary" part would catch someone who tried anything like that.Like I said, 'What's important are our whataboutism and deflection... and that you don't think we're monsters for backing these anti-abortion laws 100%.'
TBH, the wording of that law could certainly give the impression that a person could do that, which is why I think that law as it is written is stupid. The only thing that is needed is to state that a person has a legal right to life that begins at conception. Once you establish that, their existing self defence laws would be a much better way of implementing it.
Last edited: