remybfg10k
Expert Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 3,798
Apoc, humour us, can you please snap and post the ones when the camera angle was from the main stand?
Cape Town – Questions have been raised about whether Willem de Waal made a valid conversion in the dying moments of the game between the Emerging Boks and the British and Irish Lions.
The 31-year-old flyhalf on Tuesday night gave supporters a reason to cheer at the drenched Newlands stadium when he ensured that the Emerging Springboks drew 13-13 with the tourists.
But immediately after the match there was a scramble to establish if the touring team had suffered an injustice.
Journalists approached André Watson, South Africa's chief referee, about the kick. Watson admitted that he had his doubts about whether it was a valid kick and therefore studied the visual footage.
The footage appeared to be contradictory but it was finally deduced, partly from the body language of the Lions, that the kick was valid.
"I watched it on Tuesday night in slow motion. With the shot from behind, you are looking for a moment when you see the ball and the posts disappear. You get it on two shots," said Watson.
"What is absurd, is that you are looking from the other corner if the ball disappeared behind the posts. It doesn't happen, but it could perhaps only be because the image loses focus on the replay."
"The answer probably lies with the linesmen who called it. The shoulders of one of the Lions players started hanging right before the flags were lifted and he stood behind one of the linesmen, which is a further indication that the kick was valid."
But what does the humble general of the Western Province himself think about his kick. "It was comfortably there. I don’t know why it took them so long to call it," said De Waal.
"Do you think I would have carried on like that if I had missed?"
"Do you think I would have carried on like that if I had missed?"
http://www.sport24.co.za/Content/Ru...4bf98/24-06-2009 10-06/De_Waal_Kick_was_valid
My answer is YES... So who knows... Smoke and mirrors people, smoke and mirrors![]()
http://www.supersport.com/rugby/article.aspx?headline=De Waal`s equalising kick questioned&id=305501
As if Andre Watson would ever leave an official (assistant referee) out to dry
Using body language as one of the factors![]()
Earl Rose has received praise for his part in the Emerging Springboks’ 13-all draw with the British & Irish Lions on Tuesday night.
Rose started the midweek match at Newlands at flyhalf and, despite atrocious conditions, enjoyed a satisfactory first half. However, the 25-year-old came unstuck in the second half, making a number of errors and missing a regulation penalty, which would’ve closed the deficit to one.
I read on Keo.co.za that he limits himself to games up in Gauteng. He does not travel to Durbs or CT for commentary anymore.
So maybe he will commentated in one or both of the 2 tests in PTA and JHB.
Its impossible for a ball to pass in front of BOTH posts, which it did, you can see De Waal laughing and shaking his head as he himself saw it didn't go over, the SA commentators also mentioned it, why on earth do you think they kept showing replays of it?
If you look where the 15 caught it as well, it was impossible for it to have had that trajectory if it had gone through the posts.
What time is kick off?
What time is kick off?