Official Liverpool FC Supporters Thread II

Status
Not open for further replies.

fishfly

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
10,737
I didn't watch the game, but christ on a cracker..

B17FGEcIIAEMmHr.jpg


I'm not trying to pile on, but wtf is this?

Wasn't that Chelsea defending and clearing the ball? wait whats Migolet doing in the Chelsea goal? :p
 

F1 Fan

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
5,340
Johnson should never have started, neither Lovren. But ok, let's see this out....
 

superskully

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
2,606
Dagger shouldn't have been sold...
Agger should not have been sold.
Lovren (Agger), Lallana (Suso), Markovich (Ibe), Can (Lucas), Lambert, Ballo should not have been bought.
We should have learnt from Spurs that average players cannot replace a signature player.
Rather have bought Cavani for 50 million and Carvalho for 40 and fill the gap with youngsters.
 

AfricanTech

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
40,364
Agger should not have been sold.
Lovren (Agger), Lallana (Suso), Markovich (Ibe), Can (Lucas), Lambert, Ballo should not have been bought.
We should have learnt from Spurs that average players cannot replace a signature player.
Rather have bought Cavani for 50 million and Carvalho for 40 and fill the gap with youngsters.

Red - agree
Orange - neutral
Green - disagree

The greens are a good investment for the future
 

F1 Fan

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
5,340
Red - agree
Orange - neutral
Green - disagree

The greens are a good investment for the future

Im colour blind:(. Give the players time. I would say only Lovren was a bad buy. I'm not into signing defenders after one good season in the BPL. Look at previous guys: Haangeland, Ashley Williams, Scott Dann etc it blows over. Lovren for the time being can be added to that list.
 

RexxGrim

Executive Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
6,355
I've not watched a lot of Liverpool, but I've not seen a lot of Lambert. If BR is not willing to play him then he shouldn't have bought him.

Wenger does the same thing. Buy's these fringe players and then talks about how many players he has and how big his squad is, yet he is only willing to risk playing a selected few.
 

AfricanTech

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
40,364
Im colour blind:(. Give the players time. I would say only Lovren was a bad buy. I'm not into signing defenders after one good season in the BPL. Look at previous guys: Haangeland, Ashley Williams, Scott Dann etc it blows over. Lovren for the time being can be added to that list.

Red: Lovren, Ballo
Orange: Markovich, Lambert
Green: Lallana, Can

Lovren is my worst though, Ballo it could still be argued that BR is using him incorrectly (he just has such a surly face...) - Lovren doesn't know what his job is, and when he happens to get into the right areas, does it pi$$ poorly
 

hawker

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
11,461
I've not watched a lot of Liverpool, but I've not seen a lot of Lambert. If BR is not willing to play him then he shouldn't have bought him.

Wenger does the same thing. Buy's these fringe players and then talks about how many players he has and how big his squad is, yet he is only willing to risk playing a selected few.

We paid something like 2mil for Lambert...hardly broke the bank.
 

smokey

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
13,465
We paid something like 2mil for Lambert...hardly broke the bank.

The point was not how much was paid, but the fact that he is hardly being used. why buy a player and have him on your books if you are not goign to use him? Money is not the only thing there, it;s also squad harmony etc etc

BTW: Dunno how he's been used, I've seen him in a few games.
 

fishfly

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
10,737
The point was not how much was paid, but the fact that he is hardly being used. why buy a player and have him on your books if you are not goign to use him? Money is not the only thing there, it;s also squad harmony etc etc

BTW: Dunno how he's been used, I've seen him in a few games.

cos he doesn't cost 16million!
 

Fury05

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
2,463
Dortmund's Nuri Sahin Criticises Former Boss Brendan Rodgers

Borussia Dortmund midfielder Nuri Sahin has hit out at former boss Brendan Rodgers, stating that the reason that he failed to make an impact at Liverpool was because his then-manager insisted on playing him out of position.

"After scoring a few goals the manager started playing me behind the striker which does not suit my game."Despite my love for the club and the fans, I had to leave due to the managers insistence on playing me in that role."

http://www.90min.com/posts/1541383-...an-rodgers?utm_source=fotmob&utm_medium=share

Seems like the assessment of BR's stubborness was not far off.
 

fishfly

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
10,737
I don't get your point fish

I'm sure you pointed out earlier - Lambert only cost Pool 2 million... BR gives him the cameo role is as he feels his 16m signing should get more game time than the 2m player
 

AthenianOwl

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
8,897
Dortmund's Nuri Sahin Criticises Former Boss Brendan Rodgers

Borussia Dortmund midfielder Nuri Sahin has hit out at former boss Brendan Rodgers, stating that the reason that he failed to make an impact at Liverpool was because his then-manager insisted on playing him out of position.

"After scoring a few goals the manager started playing me behind the striker which does not suit my game."Despite my love for the club and the fans, I had to leave due to the managers insistence on playing me in that role."

http://www.90min.com/posts/1541383-...an-rodgers?utm_source=fotmob&utm_medium=share

Seems like the assessment of BR's stubborness was not far off.

B2O158HCMAI-Pii.jpg

Lulz.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top