Official Manchester United Supporters' Thread Part 3

[wolverine_dcp]

what does that mean? he stays with UTD till January?

They apparently both have proof for submitting the docs on time.

 

[Unhappy438]

morning, just hearing about this mess now.

so is DDG a united or madrid player?

More than likely he will remain a United player.

 

[wolverine_dcp]

I hope he goes,I wouldn't want a player that doesn't want to be where and I honestly was looking forward to see Navas and get this saga behind us

 

[Wall]

More than likely he will remain a United player.

if the deal doesn't go through, DDG will be able to sign pre contract agreements in January as he will be out of contract in the summer. Very bad news for UTD.

 

[mercurial]

http://pic.twitter.com/oXuES6iZiu

 

[zahpat]

They should make an exception for him. Otherwise he will be warming the bench at united. I dont want a player whose mind is elsewhere to play a game for us.

 

[Skimmie]

http://pic.twitter.com/oXuES6iZiu

haha

 

[Skimmie]

They should make an exception for him. Otherwise he will be warming the bench at united. I dont want a player whose mind is elsewhere to play a game for us.

Don't think the Spanish league gives a damn though and they have never given an extension so all points to deal not going through.

 

[mercurial]

Don't think the Spanish league gives a damn though and they have never given an extension so all points to deal not going through.

And the Spanish media are going to brainwash their peeps into thinking it was our fault.

 

[roadcat]

Don't think the Spanish league gives a damn though and they have never given an extension so all points to deal not going through.

Well, it (the deal) has already gone through, but the players involved will only be able to play for the respective clubs at the start of the next transfer window. Bit of a strange one.

 

[Skimmie]

Well, it (the deal) has already gone through, but the players involved will only be able to play for the respective clubs at the start of the next transfer window. Bit of a strange one.

Problem is the fee, I highly doubt RM will keep the deal as is if the player can only come in with 6 months left on his contract. They want/need their Galactico signing for the year now

 

[Wall]

Well, it (the deal) has already gone through, but the players involved will only be able to play for the respective clubs at the start of the next transfer window. Bit of a strange one.

that's my understanding as well. you can freely sign players outside the windows but they can only become eligable to play for when they are registered and they can only be registered during the transfer windows. Its like how players agree and clubs agree to sign players during the offseason, before the window opens and they get registered when it opens?

 

[AfricanTech]

Well, it (the deal) has already gone through, but the players involved will only be able to play for the respective clubs at the start of the next transfer window. Bit of a strange one.

that's my understanding as well. you can freely sign players outside the windows but they can only become eligable to play for when they are registered and they can only be registered during the transfer windows. Its like how players agree and clubs agree to sign players during the offseason, before the window opens and they get registered when it opens?

In this case, player not players.

The UK window is still open so Navas can come across and play (as long as he is registered before 18h00 this evening UK time).

If the DdG papers are not accepted as arriving on time by the Spanish League, then DdG can't play for RM.

Eish.

 

[Wall]

In this case, player not players.

The UK window is still open so Navas can come across and play (as long as he is registered before 18h00 this evening UK time).

If the DdG papers are not accepted as arriving on time by the Spanish League, then DdG can't play for RM.

Eish.

yes, but he will no longer be a United player? His contract with Madrid is still in place? He can't play because he isn't registered?

 

[fishfly]

So why the FSK would LVG want a player who doesn't want to be at United?

This whole transfer shenanigans is out of order... LVG monkey

 

[mercurial]

...

FIFA software chief Mark Goddard insists Real Madrid have no wriggle room in their attempts to close a deal for Manchester United goalkeeper David de Gea.

Real sources insist the deal should've been rubberstamped at 23:59 last night, blaming incompatible files and exchange rate problems for the delays.

However, Goddard, who oversees FIFA's transfer system software, told Sport: "There are no excuses. It is the problem of the clubs.

"There is no room for administrative error.

"If you do not have all the information to complete before the transfer deadline it is your problem. I'm sorry. It's like that."

Real hope to appeal to UEFA today to complete the signing of De Gea.

 

[AfricanTech]

yes, but he will no longer be a United player? His contract with Madrid is still in place? He can't play because he isn't registered?

who knows - we'll have to wait and see what happens - clusterfck of note though

 

[wolverine_dcp]

 

[Skimmie]

Someone in IT is getting fired today

 

[dbecks]

So why the FSK would LVG want a player who doesn't want to be at United?

This whole transfer shenanigans is out of order... LVG monkey

Who says its us....maybe its all Madrid.

Maybe they were to buy Navas and then work the deal with us, and maybe they were lowballing and stalling till now and its probably them who stuffed up