Oh come now. Maybe there's a handful of behaviors that are influenced by physiological differences, but this is not true for the most part. Gender roles are almost entirely the fault of social conditioning. Women weren't relegated to kitchen duty while men stand around the braai because of physiological differences.
It's basic psychology 101.
The two are nothing alike! One is a learned behavior, the other is an inherent sexual attraction. You can teach a child not to cry because it's not 'appropriate' for men to cry, but you can't teach a child not to love another man if he's gay.
The only people I've found who usually put forth the argument that gender roles are entirely inherent to your physiology are usually people who don't want the status quo challenged.
You've presented no arguments here. You're making baseless assertions that contradict what's obvious for the sake of what is convenient. Women go through a physiological cycle that affects their behaviour and personality on a monthly basis. Physiology clearly affects behaviour. More testosterone makes you more aggressive and less emotional. Brain chemicals drastically affects mood and behaviour. Men and women have very different body chemistry. That they will display markedly different general behaviours is a given. To believe otherwise is to believe in magic.
We're certainly able to control our behaviour and influence the behaviour of others and it's certainly desirable that we do in some cases but, the fact is that nature made the genders what they are for the sake of the survival of the species. Men are bigger and stronger and less emotionally sensitive because that is what is needed to be hunter. Women have mammary glands and are more emotionally sensitive and nurturing because that's what is needed to raise small children.
It would be very strange if we evolved physically to fulfil necessary roles but not psychologically.
And, btw I have no investment in the status quo, I have an interest in what is true as opposed to what is convenient.
Incedently, the science that supports inherent gender roles actually exists it's just dismissed by the liberal, intellectual, establishment because it basically undermines their assumptions and views.
[video=youtube_share;tiJVJ5QRRUE]http://youtu.be/tiJVJ5QRRUE[/video]