[Opinion] Cell masts - the slow, silent killers

DerekMain

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
107
You are obviously not as passionate about this whole thing as you say. Pretty sure with the right tools, you could quite easily turn off a cell mast.

Yes - I'm sure it's possible but is it legal? I would expect our Health department to protect me from these harms but they are compromised. If you thought the Gupta state capture was bad, then you have no idea how much the cell industry have captured our government. They are untouchable.
 

DerekMain

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
107
Oh be sure not to go outside, use a microwave, drink coffee, eat chocolate, eat a slice of toast, any processed foods and make sure you don't live in a city... As those are on the same level as a cellphone mast is on getting cancer which is 2b, which is basically 2b or not 2b but it's so low you may as well risk it.

According to tons of research, it IS a carcinogen not simply a "probable" carcinogen. It was given that classification to appease the cell industry.
 

mr_norris

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
3,886
Being against cell masts and having a cellphone is like being a vegetarian that eats beef. Makes no sense.

OP really needs a tl;dr; if you ask me.
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,972
Yes - I'm sure it's possible but is it legal? I would expect our Health department to protect me from these harms but they are compromised. If you thought the Gupta state capture was bad, then you have no idea how much the cell industry have captured our government. They are untouchable.

Wait what??? I really do think you need a tinfoil hat, blackout curtains and maybe a bomb shelter 40 feet underground.
 

f2wohf

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
15,157
Here is some research for you - plenty more where this came from and more coming out all the time - each more damning than the last.

The issue is why the same people don't take offence for radio, aviation, TV, satellite, Wifi waves which are for some at frequencies and intensities much more harmful than a BTS?

A cellphone actually emits more than a BTS does.

I don't believe it's harmless or good for health, I do believe waves have an impact but a small one and that it's perfectly manageable. We eat cancerous crap, we smoke, we drink, EMF are actually one of the few useful harmful things that we use and I believe that it has much more benefits than consequences.

PS: Before you go there, I've actually had a cancer.
 

DTBA

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
4,790
I live in South-Africa, they can put the mast in my backyard because I will probely die getting hit by taxi. Way before that tower becomes a issue
 

DerekMain

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
107
How many people dies in accidents vs how many dies because of cell towers?

That is such an idiotic argument. Of course people don't drop dead because they've been near a cell mast. It takes years and sometimes generations for the harms to manifest. Much like smoking - people don't drop dead from a cigarette but we know that they are harmful. Sheesh!
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,972
According to tons of research, it IS a carcinogen not simply a "probable" carcinogen. It was given that classification to appease the cell industry.
According to tons of research so does the things I listed, but it's at a level called 2b, which is really really low. You've got more chance of having a cellphone tower falling on your head and killing you.
 

Ho3n3r

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
17,058
The issue is why the same people don't take offence for radio, aviation, TV, satellite, Wifi waves which are for some at frequencies and intensities much more harmful than a BTS?

A cellphone actually emits more than a BTS does.

I don't believe it's harmless or good for health, I do believe waves have an impact but a small one and that it's perfectly manageable. We eat cancerous crap, we smoke, we drink, EMF are actually one of the few useful harmful things that we use and I believe that it has much more benefits than consequences.

PS: Before you go there, I've actually had a cancer.

Basically what I was trying to say earlier - many things we use/consume on a daily basis are obviously dangerous in some ways, but the benefits far outweigh the negatives IMO.

I'd rather live til 70 and enjoy watching movies/playing games/browsing on my phone/eating pizza, than sit in a padded cell eating broccoli sprouts til I'm 100.
 

DerekMain

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
107
You dismiss the existing evidence on alleged or supposed collusion.

Yet you don't give any study or proof to the supposed or collusion or reputable study that says otherwise...

99% of the people don't have any issue with EMF.

In fact the figure is 65%. 3% of people suffer from EHS and 35% of people are affected by EMF.
 

f2wohf

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
15,157
That's interesting - I posted a lot of links to research and that post disappeared. Am I not allowed to post links or is there censorship on this forum?

I've just taken it out of the quote to make the quote shorter. It's still on your original post.
 

FaSMaN

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
1,965
Hmm account created today ... and your comments seems to be baiting people.

Anyhow, as I have told everyone who posts about the "harms of cellphone towers", extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Post a peer reviewed, independent study from a reputable source that proves that it is bad , using the same frequencies, antenna setup and power (db) cellphone modern towers use.
Or you can just post the normal "According to tons of research .... with nothing backing it up response" like every other conspiracy theorist out there *shrugs*
 
Top