Parents fume as black and white grade R children are 'separated' in North West classroom

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
12,543
Margret aside, I was asking in the context of the child pornography issue raised in that Bing thread.
Did you see any of the kids with their clothes off? Did your kids school make you sign a permission slip to publish child pyrography? That would still be illegal even if you agree to it.
 

thechamp

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
19,133
So if the children were separated because of language issues and the photos where the black children were now mingling with everybody were not taken afterwards as a cover up, what became of the language issue when the children were now interacting with each other?
 

access

Executive Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
8,258
So if the children were separated because of language issues and the photos where the black children were now mingling with everybody were not taken afterwards as a cover up, what became of the language issue when the children were now interacting with each other?
if they get stuck they can ask each other, learning and socialising are different when it comes to language barriers. surely you understand this.

yes the teacher is there to help them, but its for simple things, instead of disrupting the session to re explain things..
 

Daruk

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
37,291
Eish, people still clutching at straws, heavily invested in apartheid and racism, hoping it never goes away so the have leverage. That’s all it is. Take that away and they have nothing to show for their years.
 

thechamp

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
19,133
if they get stuck they can ask each other, learning and socialising are different when it comes to language barriers. surely you understand this.

yes the teacher is there to help them, but for simple things instead of disrupting the session to re explain things..
So the picture where the children are seperated shows that this was because there was learning in progress and in the others where they are mixed shows that they were just socliasing? or is it the other way round?
 

access

Executive Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
8,258
So the picture where the children are seperated shows that this was because there was learning in progress and in the others where they are mixed shows that they were just socliasing? or the other way round?
the pictures show kids sitting at desks and socialising
 

Daruk

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
37,291
So the picture where the children are seperated shows that this was because there was learning in progress and in the others where they are mixed shows that they were just socliasing? or is it the other way round?
Use your imagination, any combination is possible. Are you asking what’s possible or what the actual situation was? Hopefully not the latter.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
12,543
Agreed, my kid's school has clear consent forms, which if not signed, means your kid is never in any pictures. I'm not sure they would go through all that effort if not legally required to.
It's silly to think you can say no to that and your kid will never be in any photos.

For that your kid would definitely need to stay away from all events like sport. Nobody is going to police who takes photos, of who that photo is and who might happen to accidently be in the background.

SJWs pushing this nonsense are just creating at best a shít load of admin for something innocent.
 

thechamp

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
19,133
Use your imagination, any combination is possible. Are you asking what’s possible or what the actual situation was? Hopefully not the latter.
Here is my question:
So if the children were separated because of language issues and the photos where the black children were now mingling with everybody were not taken afterwards as a cover up, what became of the language issue when the children were now interacting with each other?
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
15,596
so this shytshow has reached 40 pages ...

FFS ever since Penny it has been an unrelenting torrent of race-based BS in social media for three years running now, FML
 

Sollie

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Messages
3,608
So, colour aside, did the teacher/school have all the parent's permission to share photos of the children? My son's school has separate and clearly worded consent form that I have to sign before they can use my child's image in any way.
This gets tricky.
Teacher sends pics to parents. Who shared the images with the media and on Twitter etc. Did they have permission?
Does this make school yearbooks etc showing sports and class photos illegal now?

Perhaps we need to double the schools: real world <- > snowflake's kids/delusional/"speshul" ...

As for the news media, some of these clickbaits are nothing more than regurgatating what is said by twits on Twitter/FB and is a discredit to the media. They have it down to a fine art.

/Edit: Htf did we get to CP now? Guys, I saying to some of you: get out into the real world, you are part of the problem. A
 
Top