Shouting something loud enough doesn't necessarily make it true or make you right. Please would you quantify what you are saying to give some substance to your posts.
Do we? Ha ha, funny that when I read back through this thread I get no indication of the fact that he is getting praise for what he has done with this team! Everyone else is getting praise and he is just lucky is the just of what I pick up...
You are comparing deVil's own words to the words of Jake White supporters (not Jake White's own words). Are you clinically insane?
Damn you're a whiny little ****! Honestly Lancelot, for someone who promotes Good News SA all you seem to be able to point out is the negativity.
Now people say that they support Div, something you've been pestering everybody about for the last month, and you turn around and say they don't. No pleasing some people.
Yea lance dude you are like a broken record at times damn, i have no problems with the way you argue but damn you harp on shyte for a long time.
It's all good now though as I have a lot of "This user is on your Ignore List" posts appearing on these threads. Everything is rosy now!![]()
sadly when a team does well generally it is credited to the players, if the team is doing badly they fire the coach haha.
Guess that is just how sport goes.
Yea it seems PVD has to win every single match or he gets a bunch of crap talked about him, i mean look at the loss against the aussies, we had won 4 straight games and we lose one game and the media goes nuts![]()
Hasn't this been true of every Bok coach in history?
We're a pretty unforgiving nation.
I think the difference with PdV is that he was condemned and ridiculed from the moment he was appointed. Most people wrote him off straight away. Further to this even when he wins games he is written off as contributing very little by a lot of people.
Some may say it was his accent but that would be a little feeble as a reason to write off someone's coaching ability. Others will argue that it was his credentials but we have covered that in this thread already and he is more qualified at international level than any of the other coaches who were put forward. He also had similar experience to another well accepted coach and that is Jake White (actually I am being way to kind to Jake in saying that).
I have my views on why he was not accepted with open arms but it would probably be wrong of me to speculate... perhaps someone who was/is opposed could rather share with us why.
It was clear that PDV wasn't appointed clearly on merit and this was publically stated, not speculation. After the clear political interference with Luke Watson that preceded this its not surprising people were hostile.
Why should what happened with Luke have any bearing on our feelings regarding PdV? Or is there an aspect of that scenario that I am missing?
And then how does this explain the fact that people are still not willing to give him credit? Is it as a result of people still harbouring "anger" towards the way he was appointed?
Perhaps this is a perfect example of why BEE does work? He may not have got the job based on "merit" alone, although I still feel he had far more international experience than a lot of other coaches who were in the running, but as a result of his BEE appointment he has been able to show what he is capable of.