Plans to expropriate 3% of private company profit for new R100 billion fund

This actually makes a lot of sense. Ordinarily those profits would be paid out as dividends, and then taxed, and then crooks have to steal the tax. This way, the crooks can just have government pay it over directly without all the middle men.
 
Private sector already has 51% black shares, why are they not bettering smaller black businesses??

See now that makes a lot more sense.

Drive the black ownership agenda by giving them some of on tax break incentive or something, not forcing it on everyone.

Then you’ll get companies automatically want to encourage black ownership by wanting to get in on the benefits.

When you try and force it they will just actively try to work around it and it goes nowhere.
 
See now that makes a lot more sense.

Drive the black ownership agenda by giving them some of on tax break incentive or something, not forcing it on everyone.

Then you’ll get companies automatically want to encourage black ownership by wanting to get in on the benefits.

When you try and force it they will just actively try to work around it and it goes nowhere.
I have a feeling this 3% tax for a central fund with bee at its heart is going to face legal headwinds from the big corporates as well.
 
Anc racism and theft? Shocked. That's pretty much all they know lol.
 
According to Minister Tau, the fund will draw on various streams of private-sector financing. The Enterprise and Supplier Development (ESD) element of the B-BBEE Codes of Good Practice mandates companies to allocate 3% of their annual net profit after tax toward developing black-owned suppliers.

A good practice to promote exclusivity. Given the social and economic context, today. I have to ask since when is racism the right track?

We already have to allocate to exclusive groups. This is not an acceptable standard.
 
It's just another feeding trough. A simple attempt at creating an unregulated slush fund from which to channel funds to the politically connected, friends and family.

Parks is just grasping at straws to justify his existence.
 
^^ Actually the Apartheid government achieved 7.3% economic growth in the 60's. British newspapers called it an economic miracle and marveled that South Africa can now invest in infrastructure at heart's content. That is exactly what they did and it forms the basis of what we have today (or had not so long ago). Although whites were richer on average than blacks, the RATE of improvement of quality of life for blacks was higher than the RATE of improvement of quality of life for whites. This was an ongoing process and could not cover all of South Africa at once. Perspective is key.
 
7.3% is serious numbers. Oh how the “mighty” have fallen.
Nobody wants to be called a racist, that is why nobody revises the narrative. The worse the New South Africa becomes, the worse Apartheid suddenly was. In fact it was a predominantly Christian country and Nationalism boosted S.A. to near first world standards. Just like the British Empire was not all bad, South Africa was not all bad. In fact, the horrible things like the torture of Steve Biko and Sharpville were the exception, not the daily modus operandi. The government was conservative with finances and for a long time crisis's could be resolved with state funds, something not possible anymore. Over 50% of the annual budget was targeted on homeland development and black interests. People have a very skewed perspective of the past.
 
I had to ask:

What was South Africa's economic growth under the Apartheid government?

South Africa’s economic growth during the Apartheid era (1948–1994) was marked by periods of expansion and stagnation, heavily influenced by the country’s policies and international relations. Here’s an overview:

1948–1970s: Period of Growth
• Economic Expansion: South Africa experienced strong economic growth, particularly in the 1950s and 1960s. GDP growth averaged around 5–6% annually during this period, driven by industrialization, mining (especially gold), and agriculture.
• Government Investment: The government heavily invested in infrastructure and state-owned enterprises, which boosted economic activity. Major projects included the development of transportation networks and energy production.
• Protectionist Policies: Apartheid policies favored white-owned businesses and industries. Import substitution strategies promoted domestic manufacturing.
• Skewed Benefits: Growth primarily benefited the white minority. Black South Africans, who made up the majority of the population, were systematically excluded from economic opportunities, restricted to low-wage labor, and denied property rights.

1970s–1980s: Stagnation and Decline
• Economic Slowdown: Growth began to slow in the 1970s, falling to about 1–3% annually in the 1980s. The economy struggled with structural inefficiencies, over-reliance on mining, and limited diversification.
• Global Recession and Oil Shocks: The 1973 and 1979 oil crises, coupled with global economic downturns, hurt South Africa’s export-reliant economy.
• Sanctions and Isolation: From the mid-1980s, international sanctions and disinvestment campaigns against Apartheid policies further strained the economy. Many multinational companies withdrew, and foreign investment dried up.
• Debt Crisis: By the late 1980s, South Africa faced a growing debt crisis, exacerbated by capital flight and the inability to access international credit markets.

Impact of Apartheid Policies
• Labor Market Inefficiencies: Racially discriminatory laws, such as job reservation and restrictions on skilled work for Black South Africans, hampered economic productivity.
• Homeland System: The forced relocation of Black South Africans to underdeveloped “homelands” disrupted agricultural productivity and created long-term poverty traps.
• Education and Skills Gap: Limited access to quality education for non-white populations reduced the availability of skilled labor.

Economic Legacy of Apartheid

While the Apartheid government presided over periods of growth, its policies entrenched deep inequality, poverty, and economic inefficiencies. By 1994, when Apartheid ended, South Africa’s economy was characterized by:
• High unemployment rates (especially among Black South Africans).
• Severe income and wealth inequality.
• Underinvestment in infrastructure for the majority population.
• A dual economy, with a well-developed modern sector alongside widespread poverty.

The growth seen under Apartheid was unsustainable and heavily skewed toward benefiting the white minority while leaving a legacy of economic challenges for the post-Apartheid government.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter