
Definitely metal fatigue. Minimum maintenance done. Aircraft was simply declared airworthy. Probably happening across the board at all airlines in this country too.
Being intimately involved in the industry myself I can assure you maintaince is still taken seriously, when the sparky signs the piece of paper saying an aircraft is airworthy it is binding.
I don't know what kind of NDT inspections are done on the PC6 strut, if any are even required but the bare minimum legal (safe) requirement of maintenance would have been completed if the aircraft was maintained where I'm pretty sure it was maintained.
If the cops have their own AMO then I'd be suspicious, but I don't they they do.
Definitely metal fatigue. Minimum maintenance done. Aircraft was simply declared airworthy. Probably happening across the board at all airlines in this country too.
What is an Emer Gency Airwor Thiness Directi Ve?Further to my comments on inspections required on the PC-6
View attachment 1376981
View attachment 1376983
View attachment 1376985
What is an Emer Gency Airwor Thiness Directi Ve?
Yeah Id put about 50c that you haven't spoken to any investigators let alone even have a clue who is investigating this tragedyHaving spoken to an investigator and seeing the parts, it is clear that maintenance was not an issue at all - let alone being performed. If it was, we would not have been here today discussing this.
Thanks, I was just poking fun at the crap formatting of the heading of the report.In a nutshell this was a known issue on the porters as far back as 2007