Pool campaign sees bikini tops disappear

Status
Not open for further replies.

dominic

Legal Expert: Telecoms
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
7,303
rpm keeping abreast of the latest telecoms news late in the night.....
 

Tux

Software Communist
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
13,506
rpm, could you post a couple of pics to clear up a few points? :D :D :D
 

Tux

Software Communist
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
13,506
titillating as it may be, proper journalism requires photographic evidence with the article where possible
 

NoADSLyet

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
2,496
No hidden side agenda's while supporting this initiative I presume! Where are we having the next MyAdsl get together?

Must say they do take this equality emancipation a bit far. When I was there I noticed the word sex is used a lot in the newspapers. I only found out later it means the numeral six

Toilets! there is no distinction between male and female toilets. Not allowed in general. I luckily never got caught in an "embarrassing" situation.

Woman only like the distinction when it comes to "heavy" work, thats reserved for strong men :D
 

sox63

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
8,620
They have my absolute support on this one! :D

I wonder if the local ladies will follow suit?
 

dominic

Legal Expert: Telecoms
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
7,303
titillating as it may be, proper journalism requires photographic evidence with the article where possible
pair enough - that is no doubt an uplifting prospect for most forumites

i still think it would be a boob tho
 

Tux

Software Communist
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
13,506
pair enough - that is no doubt an uplifting prospect for most forumites

i still think it would be a boob tho
this should not be a tit for tat affair
they got to milk it for all the exposure they can get
 

dominic

Legal Expert: Telecoms
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
7,303
okay, so i'm not going to rack you up as a supporter but you may have to just grin and bare it

edit: busted :D
 

Baron Hohenzollern

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2007
Messages
186
Why degenerates? :confused:
The better question asked here, would be "Why not degenerates?"

They claim that this little tirade of cheap pornography is because the female body had been "discriminated against in the past". It's nothing but a cheap excuse to act cheap. In the old days a female who did these sort of things were considered as one who lacked respect for herself and her own body. Which suggests that the male placed the female body in higher regard than these females consider their own to be. There are numerous statues of the female body that can be pointed to, that contradicts this claim. A female was considered to be a fair and virtuous creature.

60 years ago, they wanted to be ladies, today they all want to be whores in one way or another. It's not empowering, and it's not a "token of respect for their bodies". It lowers the moral standard of society and sickens it.

What does that say of a Western world once hailed as the pillar of culture? These woman do not respect their bodies, they consider it as nothing more than cheap visual pleasure. No different to a stripper.
 
Last edited:

Omac

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
1,388
The better question asked here, would be "Why not degenerates?".
A competition to see who has the better question? :rolleyes:

They claim that this little tirade of cheap pornography is because the female body had been "discriminated against in the past". It's nothing but a cheap excuse to act cheap. In the old days a female who did these sort of things were considered as one who lacked respect for herself and her own body. Which suggests that the male placed the female body in higher regard than these females consider their own to be. There are numerous statues of the female body that can be pointed to, that contradicts this claim. A female was considered to be a fair and virtuous creature.

60 years ago, they wanted to be ladies, today they all want to be whores in one way or another. It's not empowering, and it's not a "token of respect for their bodies". It lowers the moral standard of society and sickens it.

What does that say of a Western world once hailed as the pillar of culture? These woman do not respect their bodies, they consider it as nothing more than cheap visual pleasure. No different to a stripper.
Hahahaha!
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,576
50 topless swedish women

omw does not get better than that :)

personally i love porn and whores :)

nothing wrong with women showing off their bodies
 

LoneGunman

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2003
Messages
4,552
"These woman do not respect their bodies, they consider it as nothing more than cheap visual pleasure. No different to a stripper."

what a facile pompous holier than thou body-hating comment.
a) I think they think of it as far more than 'cheap visual pleasure'.
b) Who cares what their motives are, if they're content to enjoy themselves.
c) What gave the poster the right to condemn all strippers?

"A female was considered to be a fair and virtuous creature."

Now thats a wildly chauvinist comment, disguised as 'deep concern'..
'fair and virtuous'? 'creature'?
Sounds like this poster has problems with human sexuality, and has their own
angst and shame over nudity, all mixed up with it.

The poster needs to lose their fairly immature view of human sexuality, nudity and - while we're at it - pornography. Talking about 'cheap pornography' as if its a slur, is pretty funny given that one's talking about a $10 billion industry.
Silly Stone Age poster :p
 
Last edited by a moderator:

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,576
"These woman do not respect their bodies, they consider it as nothing more than cheap visual pleasure. No different to a stripper."

what a facile pompous holier than thou body-hating comment.
a) I think they think of it as far more than 'cheap visual pleasure'.
b) Who cares what their motives are, if they're content to enjoy themselves.
c) What gave the poster the right to condemn all strippers?

"A female was considered to be a fair and virtuous creature."

Now thats a wildly chauvinist comment, disguised as 'deep concern'..
'fair and virtuous'? 'creature'?
Sounds like this poster has problems with human sexuality, and has their own
angst and shame over nudity, all mixed up with it.

I know quite well-adjusted people who respect their bodies, and who also on occasion, enjoy getting fisted - where does that fit in with the posters bizarre idea that 'respect' of the body = hiding it away like some Islamic fundamentalist hides his wife?

The poster needs to lose their fairly immature view of human sexuality, nudity and - while we're at it - pornography. Talking about 'cheap pornography' as if its a slur, is pretty funny given that one's talking about a $10 billion industry.
Silly Stone Age poster :p
anyone here love teasers!!!!!!!!!!!!!! omw i love that women undress for money
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top