Port prioritisation/shaping?

[arf9999]

Previously, while I had sh*tty speed on http downloads and browsing, I could get an average of around 13KB/s on P2P by maximising the number of threads. For two days now however, http is still sh*tty (5KB/s) and p2p is now even more sh*tty with an average of 2KB/s - no matter how many threads are active.

Maybe I'm just donating bw to the 256K packages..
[]

MW128, Tower <b>60</b>(Northpark Plaza), Signal:16%,S-N-L: 7, BER: 45%

 

[Luke7777]

Sentech giveth and they taketh away.........

128K|21%|13SNL|36 Menlopark 2530

 

[pmik]

My p2p speed has also gone for a ball of sh*t.

 

[gripen]

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Luke7777</i>
<br />Sentech giveth and they taketh away.........

128K|21%|13SNL|36 Menlopark 2530
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Hit the nail on the head there.

 

[aborg]

arf9999 - The a**holes are testng there shaping/capping software on the 256k packages. There is nothing wrong with my pings but the bandwidth turned to crap.

256k Tower:66 Fourways sig:27% snl:10 ber:71%