Power ships: a real solution to South Africa’s short-term energy needs

Compton_effect

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
12,292
Yeah, why is this being repeated?

Because people don't read.
And no - the Russians only built one so far, and it only has a 60MW reactor designed for icebreakers.

(Stopped the next inevitable suggestion)
 

Chris.Geerdts

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2014
Messages
2,251
This article has more specific detail and addresses many of the questions raised in previous forum discussions on the topic.

But I agree, it needs to be the last one

Unless there is discussion around the specifics - such as where the fuel lines could be fed into the system and where the HV infrastructure exists within our ports for faster deployment.
 

HavocXphere

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
33,155
Unless there is discussion around the specifics - such as where the fuel lines could be fed into the system and where the HV infrastructure exists within our ports for faster deployment.
One of the previous articles had a list of locations under consideration - 4 of them....only recall Coega and Koeberg.

Little concerned that they plan on using a heavy grade of fuel...that stuff is flippin nasty.
 

Compton_effect

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
12,292
Also- the biggest powership in the world - Kaya Bey, has a output capacity of around 216MW.
We'd need 10 of them.
Not 4 of 500MW each - as the article suggested.
 

KleinBoontjie

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
14,607
Because people don't read.
And no - the Russians only built one so far, and it only has a 60MW reactor designed for icebreakers.

(Stopped the next inevitable suggestion)

The Russians only built one, ja. They're not the only ones. Turkey had built more than that in the past few years, just Google a bit. On Wikipedia, they show 7 in use: LINK
Plus, way more power barges in use.
 

Johnfpro

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2009
Messages
537
This story of using energy ships to supply power, although a possibility, is not feasible by the end of the year for the following reasons:

1) we assume the company(ies) that supply these ships have the correct model(s) lying around "just in case" (mostly Turkish)
2) we assume that all the pricing and contracts, together with kickbacks are all in place
3) we would still have to build the infrastructure to connect the power from the ships to land and then the grid

and this all to happen in 7 months? Dream on.
 

MagicDude4Eva

Banned
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
6,479
I think it would take Eskom a few years to just put a fuel tank up at a port. To be honest you will be much quicker rolling out smaller solar stations which feed into towns and cities.

If the government were to provide subsidies or tax breaks for individuals and businesses to generate alternative power this wouldn't even be a problem right now.
 

FNfal

Executive Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
6,425
So where is the ship ?
We need one here in durbs .
The rossburgh substation is close enough to the harbour to connect one of these ships to the grid .
Perfect solution to south africas problem , no strikes and labour unrest while building the thing just park it and connect it .
 

Compton_effect

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
12,292
The Russians only built one, ja. They're not the only ones. Turkey had built more than that in the past few years, just Google a bit. On Wikipedia, they show 7 in use: LINK
Plus, way more power barges in use.

Turkey is building Nuclear Reactors? :wtf:
 

sovielenamen

Active Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2014
Messages
97
It is not that they build ships but they modify existing hulls which are plenty. This saves a lot of time.
For being modular it does not matter how big they get as long a hull big enough to house it exists. Important is the experience and the guarantee they give. Also there is no shutdown of the whole station needed for maintenance, just a part is affected, same for problems.

What puzzles me is that it is told they use gasturbines for power generation (plus one steam additionally to use excess heat), but in the pictures it looks to me much more like a bunch of MAN shipdiesels?

IMG_4153-620x465.jpg


This would make a lot of sense for the machines are much more economical on fuel consumption then turbines, take about everything including natural gas and are cheap and quick to aquire for the shipbuilding industry is pretty down at the moment.
Very reliable too, don't know about those depicted which look a bit on the small side, but with the bigger ones single cylinders can be switched off in case of problems, a big advantage to a turbine which is off and hard to repair in place.
 
Last edited:

bwana

MyBroadband
Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
89,376
What puzzles me is that it is told they use gasturbines for power generation (plus one steam additionally to use excess heat), but in the pictures it looks to me much more like a bunch of MAN shipdiesels?
As per the article

The electricity is generated by a number of high power alternators in the hull of the power ship, driven by reciprocating engines which can run on natural gas or heavy fuel oil. Since most harbours already have storage facilities for heavy fuel oil, all that would be required is for a fuel line to be run from the storage tanks to the ship. Each ship also has its own fuel storage tanks onboard which act as a buffer to prevent power interruption should the onshore storage tanks run low. In addition to the fuel line, high voltage powerlines will be required to evacuate the electricity from the ship’s on-board substation to the electricity grid.
 

LaraC

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Messages
42,675
Gosh, so many who didn’t like the article.
I found it insightful and think it is a possible solution to our electricity needs.
 
Top