'Pressure is not having a job', says Springbok boss Erasmus

Gordon_R

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
20,835
'Pressure is not having a job'

I was thinking about this earlier: Its fantastic to have a World Cup, but when these players careers are over in a few short years, they will have to find actual jobs for the rest of their lives...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ES1

TheMightyQuinn

Not amused...
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
32,070
I was thinking about this earlier: Its fantastic to have a World Cup, but when these players careers are over in a few short years, they will have to find actual jobs for the rest of their lives...
You can play high earning club rugby until age 38 nowadays.

With what these guys earn, you shouldn't really HAVE to work after that.
 

Nicodeamus

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
14,477
I was thinking about this earlier: Its fantastic to have a World Cup, but when these players careers are over in a few short years, they will have to find actual jobs for the rest of their lives...

they will easily get into a French club and earn a good deal of money. Combine that with good sponsorship and Branding then they should be settled for a long time.

Rugby players at club level should however be worried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ES1

Demavend

Active Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2018
Messages
57
Motivation is key, of course. However, I've seen many articles projecting politics on this victory, claiming that the South African players were superior to the English because we played in the name of diversity and acceptance and to give hope to South African race relations, while the English played for Brexit and such. and were psychologically traumatized by the effect the "evil" nationalistic Tory party has on British society. Utter nonsense. It's just a game. Players play for the glory of their nation but also for individual achievement. Just like people working in a diverse office environment, Rugby players have to leave their politics at home or get sacked, hence they create an impression of racial harmony that won't apply accross all of South African society. Most of South Africa is already as unified as a hyper diverse country could ever hope to be and this victory won't change much. If we want any more unity we'll have to actually eradicate our diversity by killing languages, cultures, force mixed relationships to homogenize the future generations, etc. but that will create far too much resistance and even open conflict.

Anyway, we won because we had superior players, a good strategy, a country that takes rugby very seriously for the most part and the had motivation. Our team has had a bed few years so there was a strong desire to show that we are one of the top teams, if not THE top team once again.
 

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,881
Motivation is key, of course. However, I've seen many articles projecting politics on this victory, claiming that the South African players were superior to the English because we played in the name of diversity and acceptance and to give hope to South African race relations, while the English played for Brexit and such. and were psychologically traumatized by the effect the "evil" nationalistic Tory party has on British society. Utter nonsense. It's just a game. Players play for the glory of their nation but also for individual achievement. Just like people working in a diverse office environment, Rugby players have to leave their politics at home or get sacked, hence they create an impression of racial harmony that won't apply accross all of South African society. Most of South Africa is already as unified as a hyper diverse country could ever hope to be and this victory won't change much. If we want any more unity we'll have to actually eradicate our diversity by killing languages, cultures, force mixed relationships to homogenize the future generations, etc. but that will create far too much resistance and even open conflict.

Anyway, we won because we had superior players, a good strategy, a country that takes rugby very seriously for the most part and the had motivation. Our team has had a bed few years so there was a strong desire to show that we are one of the top teams, if not THE top team once again.

Yeah, find that a wee bit annoying.
 

jack_spratt

Expert Member
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
4,556
Ag, what does it matter. SA won. It's a unifying force. My honest belief was that winning the 1995 world cup was the thing that allowed us to become a country of sorts, and not descend into civil war.

Surely you jest?

SA just got worse after that win, as it will this time.

Do you think the rand will strengthen?
Crime will drop now?
 

Splinter

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
30,856
Surely you jest?

SA just got worse after that win, as it will this time.

I jest not. We have Rassie at the helm, and if you read some articles, you will see he actually mentioned this exact same thing. And is planning against it.

Edit: he mentioned 2007 more specifically.
 
Top