Proteas tour to Zimbabwe: Aug-Sep 2014

Stefanmuller

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
2,924
So no go for Van Zyl in the near future then seeing as he is not in the ODI squads? I am disappoint.
 

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,117
Zim 33-2 (15.1 overs)

Piedt gets a wicket with his first ball on debut!!!
 

Creag

The Boar's Rock
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
43,527
Zim 33-2 (15.1 overs)

Piedt gets a wicket with his first ball on debut!!!

Doesn't get more special than that...

Edit : apparently the 19th player to get a wicket first ball in test cricket.
 
Last edited:

Garson007

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
11,838
Can't afford anything less than a win here. Bat once. Bat big.
 

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,117
Test 1 - Day 1 - Stumps

Zim 248-9 (89 overs)

Steyn 4/45
Piedt 4/89
 
Last edited:

OGroteKoning

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 8, 2011
Messages
10,741
I am very surprised that the four so many runs. Piedt impressed me. I agree with Garson007 - one big score and get them cheap
 

ZCFOutkast

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
1,950
This has been Steyn's worst fiver. He should be ashamed of it! Four shocking decisions from the umpire. Piedt's first wicket, and Steyn's 2-4 wickets. The Proteas are chasing a target that's potentially 80 runs less than it should've been. All in all the attack was poor. Piedt costly while striking, Morkel&Philander flat, while reputation more than anything else made Steyn look better than he was. After the stolen series in SL - ball tempering&rain - now umpires chipping in here, we didn't need this after the bullying Australia meted out. Essentially 3 series later, have the proteas really been good at any Test after the 2nd one against India? Smith shouldn't be surprised that #1 was lost. Much deserved. The Proteas haven't dominated any side at all lately. AUS would've had more than double this score after 15 overs of the reply against medium pace trundlers.
 

Die_Miek

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
504
This has been Steyn's worst fiver. He should be ashamed of it! Four shocking decisions from the umpire. Piedt's first wicket, and Steyn's 2-4 wickets. The Proteas are chasing a target that's potentially 80 runs less than it should've been. All in all the attack was poor. Piedt costly while striking, Morkel&Philander flat, while reputation more than anything else made Steyn look better than he was. After the stolen series in SL - ball tempering&rain - now umpires chipping in here, we didn't need this after the bullying Australia meted out. Essentially 3 series later, have the proteas really been good at any Test after the 2nd one against India? Smith shouldn't be surprised that #1 was lost. Much deserved. The Proteas haven't dominated any side at all lately. AUS would've had more than double this score after 15 overs of the reply against medium pace trundlers.

Scorecards don't show umpire errors, only runs and wickets. "you take the good with the good and the bad with the bad"
 

ZCFOutkast

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
1,950
There are errors, and there is sabotage. Without DRS, if what happened to Zimbabwe e.g. phantom wickets, had happened to one of the sides between say Ind-SA or Ashes the media would be resembling an inquiry right now - not the kind that Zuma commissions too. Anyway we'll see how much it affects the rest of the match. The Proteas should bat until midway after tea tomorrow. Depending on what ZIM post after that, I suspect conclusions drawn will factor in those shockers from the umpires. Manthorp&Jackman have already admitted as much on commentary.
 

modern10

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,601
There are errors, and there is sabotage. Without DRS, if what happened to Zimbabwe e.g. phantom wickets, had happened to one of the sides between say Ind-SA or Ashes the media would be resembling an inquiry right now - not the kind that Zuma commissions too. Anyway we'll see how much it affects the rest of the match. The Proteas should bat until midway after tea tomorrow. Depending on what ZIM post after that, I suspect conclusions drawn will factor in those shockers from the umpires. Manthorp&Jackman have already admitted as much on commentary.

Have you seen the errors DRS would've corrected in the Eng and India series. You can't get to nr 1 without playing well.
 

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,117
There are errors, and there is sabotage. Without DRS, if what happened to Zimbabwe e.g. phantom wickets, had happened to one of the sides between say Ind-SA or Ashes the media would be resembling an inquiry right now - not the kind that Zuma commissions too. Anyway we'll see how much it affects the rest of the match. The Proteas should bat until midway after tea tomorrow. Depending on what ZIM post after that, I suspect conclusions drawn will factor in those shockers from the umpires. Manthorp&Jackman have already admitted as much on commentary.

Why is there no DRS?
 
Top