Public protector claims only God can remove her from office

The_Mowgs

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 23, 2009
Messages
17,910
I doubt there's a chance the report will be in any way positive about her, so it's should now be a question of if parliament can agree to remove her.
Only god can remove her, and he is not in Parliament, as far as I know
 

berrypi

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
548
interesting... If this is how "educated and QUALIFIED persons" think (MP's and directors of public institutions... then i guess we can all apply to Deputy director and director roles. even lie about it cause nothing gets done - more encouraged
 

TheChamp

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
57,358
interesting... If this is how "educated and QUALIFIED persons" think (MP's and directors of public institutions... then i guess we can all apply to Deputy director and director roles. even lie about it cause nothing gets done - more encouraged
I am fully behind you man, give it a try.
 

surface

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
26,595
interesting... If this is how "educated and QUALIFIED persons" think (MP's and directors of public institutions... then i guess we can all apply to Deputy director and director roles. even lie about it cause nothing gets done - more encouraged
Honest and intelligent people like you don't stand a chance unfortunately. We rule now. Get used to it.
 

zophas

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
1,245
A little OT here. Why do we need "feasibility study" or "panel" or "task force" or whatever group to decide what people in charge should already know what to do? Are these just thinly disguised money vacuums?
 

R13...

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
46,550
A little OT here. Why do we need "feasibility study" or "panel" or "task force" or whatever group to decide what people in charge should already know what to do? Are these just thinly disguised money vacuums?
Probably to ensure Mkhwebane doesn't run off back to court to claim parliament is biased against her. This way it is an independent decision, free of political interference. They only considered the evidence. The politics will come later at the vote.
 

surface

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
26,595
A little OT here. Why do we need "feasibility study" or "panel" or "task force" or whatever group to decide what people in charge should already know what to do? Are these just thinly disguised money vacuums?
What would you suggest as a suitable alternative process ? Jail/Fire people based on what you heard?
 

Gordon_R

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
20,817
What would you suggest as a suitable alternative process ? Jail/Fire people based on what you heard?

Unfortunately our constitution makes it very hard to fire some people, for many good reasons. This makes it extra important that they are subject to proper scrutiny, before being appointed. In this case the signs were clear, but were ignored in the blatant pursuit of factional power.
 

Tokolotshe

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Messages
12,137
Unfortunately our constitution makes it very hard to fire some people, for many good reasons. This makes it extra important that they are subject to proper scrutiny, before being appointed. In this case the signs were clear, but were ignored in the blatant pursuit of factional power.
... and we got a Political Protector, bugger the Public.
 

Gordon_R

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
20,817
What constitute an extremely valid concern?

1. Zero track record of appearances in any courtroom.
2. Large unexplained gaps in CV.

The nomination process was rigged, so that better candidates were eliminated, and she was the best of a bad bunch:
 
Last edited:

TheChamp

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
57,358
1. Zero track record of appearances in any courtroom.
2. Large unexplained gaps in CV.

The nomination process was rigged, so that better candidates were eliminated, and she was the best of a bad bunch:
What courtroom experience did Madonsela have before being appointed PP?
 
Top