Public protector claims only God can remove her from office

[rietrot]

He has no such powers.

She needs to be found guilty of misconduct, incapacity or incompetence by a portfolio committee, followed by the adoption of a resolution by two-thirds of the National Assembly to remove her.

Well that is a step below an act of god. Hopefully Cyril can get the committee going, the courts already ruled that she doesn't know what she is doing, but he won't.

 

[Sean008]

Another Zuma, GFY

 

[ToxicBunny]

She has the support of Thuli,

http://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/stop-calling-for-removal-of-the-public-protector-madonsela/

Thuli seems intent on destroying her own reputation at this point.

 

[ForceFate]

Thuli seems intent on destroying her own reputation at this point.

I think she's trying to please both camps

 

[ToxicBunny]

I think she's trying to please both camps

If she thinks she can do that and keep her reputation then she isn't as smart as we all thought she was.

 

[Milano]

Is she inviting a hit?

 

[BeerIsNotGood...]

She has the support of Thuli,

http://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/stop-calling-for-removal-of-the-public-protector-madonsela/

#Hack

 

[TheChamp]

Well that is a step below an act of god. Hopefully Cyril can get the committee going, the courts already ruled that she doesn't know what she is doing, but he won't.

What committee must he get going?

 

[Gordon_R]

Relatively neutral opinion article, protect the office of the PP while objectively examining the quality of work done by the incumbent: https://www.news24.com/Columnists/Ralph_Mathekga/are-we-judging-mkhwebane-fairly-20190604

It is therefore important that Parliament hold an inquiry into Mkhwebane's position as the Public Protector. The aim of this inquiry should not be to remove her from office, but to establish if her record (of reports being overturned) is caused by genuine mistake, genuine incompetence or the pursuit of a sinister political agenda.

The inquiry should be on how Mkhwebane's quality of work relates to the mandate of the office. If the accusations are that her reports are full of conspiracies and untested reasoning, this does not justify a decision to remove her by advancing similar conspiracy reasoning. It is important to objectively establish the reasons for her sloppiness.

 

[rietrot]

What committee must he get going?

Read the thread, and don't ask silly questions.

 

[R13...]

Read the thread, and don't ask silly questions.

Parliament must remove her, CR has no legal authority to instruct parliament. He too is accountable to parliament, not the other way round

 

[TheChamp]

Read the thread, and don't ask silly questions.

My humble apologies for annoying you.

 

[rietrot]

Parliament must remove her, CR has no legal authority to instruct parliament. He too is accountable to parliament, not the other way round

Parliamentary committee, so not all of Parliament. Who is responsible to get that going?

I'm sure if seen the president start these committees before?

 

[TheChamp]

Parliamentary committee, so not all of Parliament. Who is responsible to get that going?

I'm sure if seen the president start these committees before?

Oh dear!

 

[Drifter]

But Cupcake Cyril isn't going to do anything to remove her so she will remain in her position until her term expires.

Only Angels can. Castiel where are you????

 

[rietrot]

Oh dear!

Care to educate me on how it works? There's hundreds of committees, I don't know the difference.

 

[TheChamp]

Care to educate me on how it works? There's hundreds of committees, I don't know the difference.

I am afraid it would sound silly.
The last thing I want is to look silly on the internet.

 

[lkswan747]

Conceited B with an Itch

 

[Temujin]

Cloudy? is that you?

 

[BBSA]

I am afraid it would sound silly.
The last thing I want is to look silly on the internet.

That boat has sailed a long time ago, comrade