Cosmik Debris
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2021
- Messages
- 35,145
From what I can gather they're some form of warning letter
Seems to possibly be related to something like audi alteram partem
Audis alteram partem means right to reply.
From what I can gather they're some form of warning letter
Seems to possibly be related to something like audi alteram partem
Heading, yes. Narrative, no. She expected excessive gestures indicating respect. It was her ego. If indeed she expected people to rise whenever she enters a room (note, NOT only a boardroom or at meetings, but everywhere), this is plain egomania.
No it is not. If you, having any sort of C-level experience, expect employees to rise every time you enter a room, I will not work for you. And your production would be abysmal, interrupting processes and concentration of every employee if you just walk through a room and expect to be risen to. Please note the difference between "every instance" , and "normal instances" of decorum, such as meetings. This is crux.
Boardroom decorum vs every-instance decorum. No-one is confusing the two, except you.
Did you not hear the part where she had one of the employees removed - yes, FIRED - simply because she called her "Busisiwe"? She did not care to engage with concerns, merely had the person removed from office? Did you not follow the testimonials with all the audi letters? Sanctions were blatantly excessive and severe.
Audis alteram partem means right to reply.
Looks like superior genes puked again? Am I right or am I ?Indian institutions are recognised in the US and Australia.
Some legal jargon?
Looks like superior genes puked again? Am I right or am I ?
Good thing they stopped teaching it, pointless nonsense, what's wrong with good, old fashioned English?Latin. No longer taught in SA legal schools to the detriment of the legal meaning.
Audi- To hear
Alteram- To present a point of view which may be different
Partem.- To discuss the merits.
Xhosa and Zulu in legal arguments?
The foundations of our law are based in Rome. Understanding their language allows a deeper understanding of the legal principlesGood thing they stopped teaching it, pointless nonsense, what's wrong with good, old fashioned English?
Good thing they stopped teaching it, pointless nonsense, what's wrong with good, old fashioned English?
They'll get it all from Google, it's just scattered terminology. I honestly can't believe it was really being taught as a course, it must have been the most boring course of all time.The foundations of our law are based in Rome. Understanding their language allows a deeper understanding of the legal principles
We no longer follow many of those laws written in latin.Latin. No longer taught in SA legal schools to the detriment of the legal meaning.
Audi- To hear
Alteram- To present a point of view which may be different
Partem.- To discuss the merits.
Xhosa and Zulu in legal arguments?
That's like saying engineers can just get their maths from Google.They'll get it all from Google, it's just scattered terminology. I honestly can't believe it was really being taught as a course, it must have been the most boring course of all time.
No, it's not.That's like saying engineers can just get their maths from Google.
They'll get it all from Google, it's just scattered terminology. I honestly can't believe it was really being taught as a course, it must have been the most boring course of all time.
No, it's not.
We no longer follow many of those laws written in latin.
Not in their spirit anyway.
Very much interpretive dance/law at this point.
Is anywhere still following Roman law ?SA law has devolved to the interpretation of the throwing of bones.
Good thing they stopped teaching it, pointless nonsense, what's wrong with good, old fashioned English?