See hidden discussions | Win great prizes | Get free support
Amazing. Direct leadership. To the core. Would hate to say it's something we miss around here - but unfortunately true.Xarog said:Actually, I was thinking just the opposite. He 'responded' to Tutu's recent dismay about the lack of whites seeking repentance, saying that blacks should be thankful that whites gave up power peacefully.
He is still around ... just more active in civil society rather than party politics.mooK said:I wonder why he's so quiet about politics in SA these days. I can't remember when last I've heard of him in the news, I'd like to read more about what he thinks.
He says in the article that wasn't the case.that South Africa's Nuclear Arsenal would get into the hands of one of the ANC's allies.
I think it is as simple as that?
What was your motivation?
First of all, the threat had changed, we didn’t need [the bomb], it had become a millstone around our neck. [Also,] I wanted South Africa to return as soon as possible to the international arena, and I wanted to convince the rest of the world that we really were not playing with words, we really were prepared to undertake negotiations which would result in fundamental change. I wanted to achieve international support for the change process in South Africa, and I wanted to ensure that the leading countries of the world would keep an eye over the negotiation process and that if [there were] a threat of the negotiations deteriorating into further conflict, then they would step in to assure that a negotiated solution is guaranteed.
We weren't supposed to start from scratch - that is the fault is this present government implementing AA and BEE - guarantees we are starting from scratch (more like starting from the dark ages.)DigitalSoldier said:would have been a lot easier to have a civil war then we could start from scratch and no1 to blame
As far as I know this is the whole issue with Iran - they are a signee - which India and Pakistan aren't... so Iran is being held to higher standards whereas India and Pakistan are allowed to play merrily with their nuclear arsenal (and now be supported by Bush)... Double standards in the most sickening way. And if US did ever use nuclear (in this present) - they would be even more the pariahs they are already. America is spending its last bit of goodwill with the world at large - I hope George is worth it (to them.)BTTB
What is the position in International Law if a Nuclear Weapon is used against a country that has none in the case of war scenario? The Nuclear Proliferation Treaty for instance.