BBSA
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 21,925
Yeah, the fact are there, and they disagree with you.
Actually not, if you look nicely you will see the US is at the top.
Yeah, the fact are there, and they disagree with you.
And if you look carefully, you'll see that they're reporting liabilities as assets.Actually not, if you look nicely you will see the US is at the top.
And if you look carefully, you'll see that they're reporting liabilities as assets.![]()
Tell you what. Loan me all your money, using the methodology of that site, I'll be "richer" than you.I had another look, and the US is still at the top![]()
Tell you what. Loan me all your money, using the methodology of that site, I'll be "richer" than you.
(P.S. when talking about facts, it doesn't look very good when you quote conclusions without being able to understand the processes that went into forming that conclusion.)
Common guys, you sound like complete crackpots...
BUT that is not a projection, the US may be unable to keep up its borrowing forever but in the mean time if the rest of the world continues to look past this they still are the strongest economy...
Oh ffs. The source is the CIA. No chance of bias there, nosirree.Common guys, you sound like complete crackpots... there is the obvious BIAS presented by each of you, yes the source says US is no1.
Wanna take a 3 year wager? I'll bet you that 3 years from, the US will be nowhere near the largest economy. (Note, biggest != strongest, nor does having a large economy imply wealth.)BUT that is not a projection, the US may be unable to keep up its borrowing forever but in the mean time if the rest of the world continues to look past this they still are the strongest economy...
Oh ffs. The source is the CIA. No chance of bias there, nosirree..)
Wanna take a 3 year wager? I'll bet you that 3 years from, the US will be nowhere near the largest economy. (Note, biggest != strongest, nor does having a large economy imply wealth.)
More quoting random stats without having the faintest clue as to how they were derived.Oh ffs. Here is one from wiki:
We are actualy talking about today.
More quoting random stats without having the faintest clue as to how they were derived.
Companies are insolvent long before they are actually declared insolvent. The declaration requires an investigation which takes time. The US has been in a "hidden" recession for well over a year already. The asset prices for most of the stock markets which is largely used to measure GDP is still grossly over-inflated and both the banks and the governments are keeping quiet as mice (on purpose) about the true nature of just how bad all those derivatives are. Bottom line is, we'll only know what today was like tomorrow, and in 3 years time it will be obvious to everyone, even people like yourself who are entirely ignorant of even the most basic concepts of economic theory.
Because all lists count debt (liabilities) as wealth (assets). Enron accounting 101.Nice try, but no cigar. The US is still at the top no matter which list you use![]()
Because all lists count debt (liabilities) as wealth (assets).
The "FACTS" is that those numbers were derived through creative accounting, aka, people were lying through their teeth. It's about as much "fact" as the ANC being white.OK, why do you not keep on talking BS for another day, and we will see if the FACTS has changed tomorrow![]()
The "FACTS" is that those numbers were derived through creative accounting, aka, people were lying through their teeth. It's about as much "fact" as the ANC being white.
Excuse me butting in, but that Wikipedia link is showing it was deleted some years ago, and Googling for a list shows:
List of countries by GDP (nominal) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This site may harm your computer.
WTF???
![]()
More quoting *random stats* without having the faintest clue as to how they were derived.
Companies are insolvent long before they are actually declared insolvent. The declaration requires an investigation which takes time. The US has been in a "hidden" recession for well over a year already. The asset prices for most of the stock markets which is largely used to measure GDP is still grossly over-inflated and both the banks and the governments are keeping quiet as mice (on purpose) about the true nature of just how bad all those derivatives are. Bottom line is, we'll only know what today was like tomorrow, and in 3 years time it will be obvious to everyone, even people like yourself who are entirely ignorant of even the most basic concepts of economic theory.
'Lies, damn lies, and statistics!' Off-shoring is not taken into account here. The production of US companies that move their manufacturing to other countries, notably China because of the availability of cheap labour, is officially regarded as part of US GDP. In other words, stuff made in China by Chinese workers and imported by America and others magically becomes part of American gross 'domestic' product. It does put a legitimate question mark over any 'official' stats.